As a matter of interest, what typically happens on the SIGP'ed to processor
when a SIGP is issued? I assume some kind of routine runs.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 14 Oct 2021, at 03:24, Jim Mulder wrote:
>
> It is assigned.
> It is used by z/OS.
> It is intentionally not described i
My personal favorite title to cover the security admin functions I did, way
back in the dark ages, was "acting assistant security administrator." My
director was on paper as the security administrator, his #2 was the assistant
security administrator but I was the one who went into RACF and did
The Linkage Section is how modules pass data from the top module in the chain
down, and then back. In fact, they don't "pass" the data at all, but use a
single address that is established by the top-most caller. All modules use the
same address which is located in the top-most module's DSECT,
Of course in my last example,
compute N = 1066
move 'ty' to A
goback.
Should be
compute N = 1066
move 'ty' to X
goback.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
Yes. The SIGP from one CPU causes an action on the target. Exactly what
that action is depends on the "order". The "order" in this case, 0x14, is
not defined in the PoPS, by design. It is proprietary to IBM.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, 03:20 Martin Packer wrote:
>
>
> As a matter of interest, what typ
Ron,
Yes, you are right.
However when talking about VSAM and CICS we think about some
transactional system. It should be... transactional, which also mean it
should survive sudden power (or data center) outage. Survive - mean all
comitted transactions are still present, all uncommitted transac
Well, in Poland when you graduate some technical university
(polytechnic) you are "mgr inż." which means "magister engineer".
Magister is MsC (master of science?) equivalent.
However regarding engineer this is usurpation to use "engineer" without
diploma and AFAIK it is also illegal.
It is also
I strongly prefer Systems Administrator over Systems Programmer.
Reason: people think Systems Programmer is just Application Developer.
Programmer writes programs. In COBOL or .NET.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 13.10.2021 o 19:19, Carmen Vitullo pisze:
The company I am currentl
W dniu 12.10.2021 o 18:24, Tom Brennan pisze:
When I started the work I'm currently doing with an IBM business
partner, they made a card for me that said:
Sr. zEngineer
IBM zEnterprise Practice
Well... When my team started to work for external customers we created
business cards. There was
Thanks for the reply, and I am already familiar with the differences between BY
VALUE and BY REFERENCE. In my particular case all CALL parameters are BY
REFERENCE (by default, no BY phrases are used), and I expected the nested
COMMON subprogram to use the address passed in the call that referre
Anyone can call himself an engineer (e.g. a motor mechanic etc.) It is
illegal for anyone to call himself a *Chartered Engineer* (CEng) without
being qualified and registered as such with an accredited Engineering
institution. HTH.
Chris Poncelet CEng MBCS CITP
On 14/10/2021 17:59, Radoslaw S
>In my specific case, there is a COPY structure populated in the outermost p=
>rogram level that is passed in CALL statements to nested COMMON subprograms=
> (which can also CALL each other) and all the COMMON subprograms use the sa=
>me COPY structure to define their LINKAGE parameter. I just did
Hi Tom,
My case is that the names are not unique and they are passed to the nested
subroutine via CALL parameter. Like this, to use your short example:
ID DIVISION.
PROGRAM-ID. OUTER1.
ENVIRONMENT DIVISION.
DATA DIVISION.
LINKAGE SECTION.
1 X1 PIC X(8)
Hi Chris,
In which country or countries is your statement correct?
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:25:10 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
>Anyone can call himself an engineer (e.g. a motor mechanic etc.) It is
>illegal for anyone to call himself a *Chartered Engineer* (CEng) without
>being qualified and regis
14 matches
Mail list logo
