What's in your active IKJTSOxx?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tom
Sims [trs...@att.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 11:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.
"A/C power consumption is
not that easily derived, unlike DC. I'll continue to use the laws of
physics."
It is very easily derived. I do it all the time...
If I want to know how much power a rack is using, I measure the amps on
each leg of the PDU, then multiply by the volts. If the rack has a s
CONSPROF and CONSOLE are both in AUTHCMD.
/Tom
On 5/6/2021 3:23 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
What's in your active IKJTSOxx?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archi
Yes, of course, but what numbers are there under CONSOLE?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tom
Sims [trs...@att.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 8:25 AM
T
On 5/5/2021 1:13 PM, Dave Jousma wrote:
... For some reason we are still struggling.
For anyone still struggling to connect with FTPS to IBM's download
server after the May 1 server update, please, please, PLEASE consider
telling SMP/E to use HTTPS for the downloads instead of FTPS. It is
Sorry, defaults, which should be plenty:
CURRENT SETTINGS FOR CONSOLE:
INITUNUM 1000
INITSNUM 1000
MAXUNUM 1
MAXSNUM 1
/Tom
On 5/6/2021 5:35 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Yes, of course, but what numbers are there under CONSOLE?
--
Shmu
I was easier for me to setup and get permission from the security folks and our
network folks, the only additional setting we needed were the proxy statements
adding my LAN ID and password to pass thru the proxy
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message-
From: Kurt
To: IBM-MAIN
Date
This isn't the wrong forum - I'm seeking advice from the mainframe community
and there may be some who aren't using the rocket forums :)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@li
To complement:
1. Power is measured in Watts. Dot. No Amperes.
2. AC current power formula is a little bit more complex. It is P=U x I
x cos(fi). It is matter of "passive power" caused by coils and
capacitors. That's for linear receivers. To make long story short, most
IT equipment has cos fi
W dniu 06.05.2021 o 07:42, Timothy Sipples pisze:
Bill Giannelli wrote:
Our network security group (with no mainframe knowledge) is complaining
about the use of telnet for mainframe connections as they say it is not
encrypted.
Your network security group is correct to complain.
We use attachm
@Arthur, good point. Thank you. I will keep that sort of issue in mind.
I have opened an issue with IBM Dallas. I will see what they say, and may
suggest looking into those reserved ports.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] O
> 4. This is the topic for electrician, not for IT guy. (Ok, I'm licensed
> electrician with little mainframe knowledge).
Little mainframe knowledge? Are you trying to give me an inferiority complex? 😊
That's like saying Peter Relson knows a little about operating systems!@
Bob
-Original
If a port is in use, I would not expect that port number to be returned when
requesting the next available port number, and I would expect it to show up in
a netstat command.
I think a firewall is blocking the ports you are having a problem with.
In the IP Configuration Reference
https://www-01.
That's pretty funny Bob :)
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message-
From: Robert <01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN
Date: Thursday, 6 May 2021 9:32 AM CDT
Subject: Re: Datacentre Rack power clarification
> 4. This is the topic for electrician, not for IT
Don't you need an E on the command: 10:06:05.30 SYSTVPSC 0290 DISPLAY
NET,ID=SYSTP011,E
Eileen Barkow ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov
CICS systems
Desk: 718-403-8649
Cell: 917-436-0508
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, Ma
Yup! The answer from Dallas is
http://dtsc.dfw.ibm.com/MVSDS/'HTTPD2.DSN01.PUBLIC.SHTML(BLKPORTS)'
I think that is a public document. If it's not, well, sorry.
I guess I will add all of these to the PORT list.
Thanks everyone for your suggestions.
No idea how blocking these improves system se
Hi Rex,
There is an option in DEVSUPxx to enable FlashCopy on async pprc devices.
The option is FLASHCOPYTOGM and unfortunately it has not made it to the IBM
Docs yet. We are working with the team to get it added. This is not
'Preserve Mirror' or 'Remote Pair FlashCopy' for async pprc, but it do
On the listserv web interface, the link works only if I change the single
quotes to percent27. I spell out percent27 here because if I use the percent
sign, the listserv might render percent27 as a single quote., which would be
confusing to read. For all I know, you may have used the percent27 i
What’s the secret decoder ring/handshake to make FTP work? We need
AT-TLS? Or can we make updates to the FTPDATA DD (using TLSMECHANISM FTP)?
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:46 AM Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
> On 5/5/2021 1:13 PM, Dave Jousma wrote:
>
> > ... For some reason we are still struggling.
>
On Thu, 6 May 2021 08:54:18 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>Yup! The answer from Dallas is
>
>http://dtsc.dfw.ibm.com/MVSDS/'HTTPD2.DSN01.PUBLIC.SHTML(BLKPORTS)'
>
>I think that is a public document. If it's not, well, sorry.
>
404
-- gil
---
Hi Robert,
Thank you for this information. It is definitely helpful. We have separate
pools of local DASD on our DS for those that are replicating and those that
aren't. The vast majority of our flashcopy target data doesn't need to
replicate to our DR site but we have a small subset that do
Nevermind, found this in the latest book
*TLSMECHANISM*
Use this statement to specify whether TLS is implemented by AT-TLS or by
FTP.*ATTLS indicates TLS processing is performed by AT-TLS, and must be
specified in order to support TLS 1.2 which is required by IBM's download
server.*
On Thu, M
Try this: https://ibm.biz/Bd2UaA
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 9:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Looking for help understanding an FTP problem
On
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=statements-port-statement
It should obviate the problem. Not yet tested.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bill Godfrey
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 9:24 AM
To: IBM-M
> On 2021-05-06, at 10:24:07, Bill Godfrey wrote:
>
> On the listserv web interface, the link works only if I change the single
> quotes to percent27. I spell out percent27 here because if I use the percent
> sign, the listserv might render percent27 as a single quote., which would be
> confusi
Just FYI...
https://www.networkworld.com/article/3617911/ibm-moves-toward-consumption-based-mainframe-pricing.html
Regards,
Mark Regan, K8MTR
*CTO1 USNR-Retired, 1969-1991*
*Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017*
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mark.t.regan
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedi
Wow! Looks like HTML coming from an MVS dataset. I don't think I've
seen that in maybe 20 years.
On 5/6/2021 9:24 AM, Bill Godfrey wrote:
On the listserv web interface, the link works only if I change the single
quotes to percent27. I spell out percent27 here because if I use the percent
si
W dniu 06.05.2021 o 18:27, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Thu, 6 May 2021 08:54:18 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
Yup! The answer from Dallas is
http://dtsc.dfw.ibm.com/MVSDS/'HTTPD2.DSN01.PUBLIC.SHTML(BLKPORTS)'
I think that is a public document. If it's not, well, sorry.
404
-- gil
Typo.
Gil,
All of the Dallas HTML documents are hosted in a PDS!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Brennan
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Looking for help understanding an
On Thu, 6 May 2021 08:54:18 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>Yup! The answer from Dallas is
>
>http://dtsc.dfw.ibm.com/MVSDS/'HTTPD2.DSN01.PUBLIC.SHTML(BLKPORTS)'> [RFC
>1738; gil]
>
>I think that is a public document. If it's not, well, sorry.
>
>I guess I will add all of these to the PORT list.
>
I
If you can determine what ports your various firewalls consider "dangerous",
you can reserve them in your TCPIP parms. Then they aren't used via FTP (or
others) when suggesting a temporary highport
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
RFE not really appropriate to the Dallas offering. It is kind of a "what you
see is what you get" product offering. It is darned good for the price.
The service is an entire (virtual) mainframe. The user "owns" it. We "own" our
own TCPIP. I will edit the TCPIP profile to reflect the port reserv
On 6/05/2021 9:17 pm, Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
This isn't the wrong forum - I'm seeking advice from the mainframe community
and there may be some who aren't using the rocket forums :)
I would argue that it is the wrong forum. Rocket z/OS Ported Tools come
with two types of support. Free with for
On 7/05/2021 10:55 am, David Crayford wrote:
I would argue that it is the wrong forum. Rocket z/OS Ported Tools
come with two types of support. Free with forum support and paid where
you open a Ticket in SalesForce and are guaranteed service levels.
IBM would no doubt argue the same thing wi
On 7/05/2021 9:17 am, Andrew Rowley wrote:
On 7/05/2021 10:55 am, David Crayford wrote:
I would argue that it is the wrong forum. Rocket z/OS Ported Tools
come with two types of support. Free with forum support and paid
where you open a Ticket in SalesForce and are guaranteed service levels.
I wrote:
>and I believe Attachment's SSL/TLS support has been around for at
>least 20 years.
I meant Attachmate, not Attachment. :-)
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>I can be wrong, but I read that data portions for telnet traffic are so
>small that there is no interest to call ICSF functions and ju
36 matches
Mail list logo
