To summarize:
1. You don't think it's necessary to have editor features like code
completion, refactoring, hover-help, syntax highlighting or static code
analysis.
2. Writing macros is an absolute must even if the editor that you use
provides commands and key mappings so there is no requireme
Once again you are lying about what others think.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
David Crayford [dcrayf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 3:4
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 17:35:57 +0100, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
>
>The problem is not at the client side (ASCII codepages);
>the problem is that the EBCDIC codepages in Europe have the
>exclamation point (!) at the place, where the American EBCDIC has |,
>and so, if you transfer from an European EBCDIC c
Am 31.01.2021 um 15:19 schrieb Paul Gilmartin:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 17:35:57 +0100, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
The problem is not at the client side (ASCII codepages);
the problem is that the EBCDIC codepages in Europe have the
exclamation point (!) at the place, where the American EBCDIC has |,
and s
Yes, EBCDIC code pages are a mare's nest, even from a US-centric perspective.
IND$FILE uses a 3270 datastream and runs within your TSO session. WSA uses an
SNA or TCP/IP session totally independent of your 3270 session, and supports
ISPF running in batch.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mas
If none of your data are binary, all character data use the same EBCDIC code
page and all the characters exist in the target code page then that will work
as far as visual fidelity is concerned. If you intend to use the data with a
language processor then you also need to ensure that it supports
Never heard of a Version 4.10 of SPF/PC. Perhaps that was in the US and
not in the UK. AFAIK The last version of SPF/PC distributed on floppy
disks was 4.0.6 - with the final 4.0.7 fix available for download only
from CTC's bulletin board (when it was still around, in 1995). After
that, CTC switche
I have a situation where I LOAD a program, with a PSW KEY of 8,
then branch to it.
The program switches to KEY 9, but wants to reference some
data in the loaded CSECT (say, for example, a =F constant in the
literal area.)
This blows up, I'm guessing because the key isn't the same as the
loaded m
I've seen this mentioned here before. Would anyone who is using mind sharing
your key map file? I'm playing around with it on my Mac. Looking for a
headscarf.
Thanks, dave
This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be
privileged.
It is intended only for the
"In this case, the control program places the module in subpool 252. When
choosing between subpools
244 and 251. the control program uses:
• Subpool 244 only when within a task that was created by ATTACHX with the
KEY=NINE parameter
• Subpool 251in all other cases
Subpool 244 is not fetch protect
10 matches
Mail list logo
