Hello
Does anyone have experience in using git for zOS(rocket open-source) to
manage parmlib or proclib ?
I would like to know your experience and some guidance on this.
Jake
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I may be incorrect, but isn't the image profile to say this image is allowed to
have these many CPs?
Or is it also supposed to bring it online ...
If not, adding it to COMMND00 should be enough
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, July 9, 2020 12:32 AM, Mark Jacobs
<0224d287a4
On 9/07/2020 5:52 pm, Jake Anderson wrote:
Does anyone have experience in using git for zOS(rocket open-source) to
manage parmlib or proclib ?
I have been doing some experimentation with this to track changes.
At the moment I have a script to copy all members from PARMLIB/PROCLIB
and various
Hi Paul,
Translating the Zohar into Sanskrit is not as strange as it sounds.
Regards,
David
On 2020-07-08 23:58, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 17:28:17 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
Regarding 2: *if* it was a "round trip" translate table and *if* one could
get a copy of the table the
Hi Skip,
My program does it in one call.
Regards,
David
On 2020-07-09 00:20, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
My experience with RACF echoes Bob Bridges, as does the excellent code sample
from David Spiegel. A single call directly to RACF returns a yes/no for the
level of access queried in that call.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:04 PM Bob Bridges wrote:
> I've been doing mainframe security for a few decades now, but I've never
> learned IBM's version of assembler (I still have ambitions of doing that
> eventually) so I may be mistaken about how RACROUTE works. But my
> impression is that the que
Andrew,
There are a couple of tools to do searches, compare changes, etc. One example
is a tool, called Fisheye, https://www.atlassian.com/software/fisheye.Also,
I have been working on an open source project, called Polycephaly, but it is
mainly for building z/OS application. However, I h
You need to deactivate/reactivate the LPAR (@ HMC) after configuring the image
profile as desired. This is more than an IPL..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 5:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
IMHO yes ...or no.
This is TS1140. 3592-E07 can be attached, but EH7 is smaller version and
I guess logically it is the same as E07, but it may not fit correctly
into TS4500. Maybe this is a question of some "real" hardware (cradle,
rail, bever), maybe not.
However it is a question for CE, l
Yes. I general there are many choices:
1. Re-Activate LPAR profile. Of course change it before.
2. Use command (human or COMMNDxx) to CF CPU online.
3. Use Jim Mulder advice (PRESCPU).
4. Logically add CPU to the LPAR using HMC facilities (z10 or above).
Assuming the IPL is human-controlled (not
Regarding tapes: this is one of the advantages of using HSM and physical
tapes. It's quite easy to manage that even very old backup is on quite
recently recorded tape. Migration from older tape system to new one is
piece of cake. For VTS things are a bit more complex but still it is
possible. "
Azure? Cloud?
There is no cloud. It is just someone else's computer. ;-)
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 08.07.2020 o 17:46, Joe Monk pisze:
I do a backup to spinning storage, then a copy of that backup to Azure for
long term.
Joe
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:12 AM Seymour J Metz
IMHO no and there is no reason. Is the backup OK? Just read it. Any
error will be reported. Physical errors are reported by the hardware.
Is backup altered by hostile user? Protect it using RACF or else.
However educated and authorized user may alter backup and re-create hash.
Do you want to sle
Regarding eggs and backets.
This is english proverb, not used in Poland.
I rather use electricity example: serial and parallel connection of
light bulbs. The idea of two datacenters is to have bulbs in parallel -
one may fail, but the other will work. However sometimes (especially in
Windows wo
Charles,
Were you prepared of coronavirus? Were your company prepared for that 3
years ago? No.
Are your company prepared for terrorist attack at all datacenters at the
time? It depends on the sword being used, but generally no.
Unlikely things do happen. More unlikely things do happen. Even mor
Hi list,
Wilbur source is not that "trashed".
After uploading it to USS I can access the code in a perfectly readable way
using ISPF Edit :
EDIT /u/sys56/WYLORV/Mainframe/GG.PUB/WINGS.COMMANDS Columns 1 00
Command ===> Scroll ===> C
Charles,
Fascinating. JTC isn't even in the customization macro. I guess it's a "watch
this space for future development" type option.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 6:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA
And of course HSM duplexing for ML2 and Backup tapes automatically
covers the requirement to use different drives. Since the two copies
are made concurrently, that guarantees they have to be on different drives.
It should be obvious enough to not need saying, but you also don't make
two copies o
Im sure that Kim Dotcom would love your legal theory...
Joe
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:51 AM R.S. wrote:
> Azure? Cloud?
> There is no cloud. It is just someone else's computer. ;-)
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>
>
>
>
>
>
> W dniu 08.07.2020 o 17:46, Joe Monk pisze:
> > I do a backu
About 100 years ago I wrote such a program and did 4 calls, one each for
ATTR=READ/UPDATE/CONTROL/ALTER. So either something new came out later,
or I just didn't look hard enough :) I never thought of it as a big
deal though, it's not like my program was getting called a million times
a day.
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 21:51:11 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>> Why is a utility targeted for IBM mainframes (other than Linux for z)
>> translated into "ASCII"?
>
>My guess is there was no "why." They just downloaded it and the default was
>ASCII translation. It's bitten me more times than I care to
*The* code pages used for *that* default (?) translation would utterly depend
on the FTP server, the FTP client, and their configurations. For example, my
WS_FTP is configurable such that .txt files get translated (and the .txt is
truncated or appended for PDS member names) but others do not. Ye
Ref : Do SAVE and COPY to PDS(E) work likewise?
No. Neither do CREATE. Only CUT/PASTE.
--
Raphael Dal Pos / z/OS Support
Generali Shared Services S.c.a.r.l.
GSS\CIN-MF (Central Infrastructure Mainframe)
11-17, Avenue François Mitterrand
93200 Sain
In article <8236998877318111.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote:
...
> (Are there DBCS terminals? Does ISPF support them?)
Yes and yes. Condor (from Phoenix) does too since I added the support.
We got a Korean 3270 shipped from some factory floor to test with. My
boss shows up at m
If I remember correctly, it was added with a PTF inadvertently and hasn’t
been removed yet. I think a colleague opened a case and that’s what they
said.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:58 AM Pommier, Rex wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Fascinating. JTC isn't even in the customization macro. I guess it's a
> "
I'd like to take this opportunity to thank Sri Kolusu, of IBM, for taking the
time
to help with the open exit IFG0EX0B, in regards to IEBGENER/ICEGENER and
DF/SORT.
He has spent the last few days researching and testing.
He came up with a solution, and the exit is now working with IEBGENER/ICEGE
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:02:20 -0400, Don Poitras wrote:
>...
>> (Are there DBCS terminals? Does ISPF support them?)
>
>Yes and yes. Condor (from Phoenix) does too since I added the support.
>
This?: https://phoenixsoftware.com/condor.htm
Doesn't seem to be a terminal emulator.
What CP/CCSID? Does
One call to your program, or one call to RACF?
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On B
Both are one call.
On 2020-07-09 14:25, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
One call to your program, or one call to RACF?
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
--
In article <1298199795294174.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:02:20 -0400, Don Poitras wrote:
> >...
> >> (Are there DBCS terminals? Does ISPF support them?)
> >
> >Yes and yes. Condor (from Phoenix) does too since I added the support.
> >
> This?: https:/
One call to RACF - according to the description for the STATUS=ACCESS
keyword on the RACROUTE REQUEST=AUTH macro in the RACROUTE manual:
ACCESS - The request is simply to return the user's highest current access
to the resource specified. Upon successful completion, the user's access is
returned
I am running ISMF to get a list of volumes (2.1) and many volumes are missing
from the list. I ran thru all of the options and don't see any filters.
What obvious thing am I doing wrong? It worked a few days ago, when I set SMS
as the source of the list. I reset it to physical but still only SMS.
Obvious questions would be
1) do you have some kind of filter on screens 2 or 3 of the selection criteria?
2) old CDS name?
3) using a saved list instead of generating a new one for the source?
If none of these things are it, may I suggest showing us your volume selection
entry panel?
Rex
---
Deepest apologies to David Spiegel. And to IBM. I never noticed the ACCESS
option on the RACROUTE macro even though it's been there for a long time.
RACF 1.9 is pretty hoary.
So David's program is a nifty way to get the highest level of access allowed
with a single call to RACF. I'm not su
No, no and no
Panel Defaults Utilities Scroll Help
ss
VOLUME SELECTION ENTRY PANEL Page 1 of 3
Command ===> Select Source to Generate Volume List . . 2 (1 - Saved list,
2 - New list)1 Genera
While I’m waiting on my sysprog and IBM to finish scratching their heads I
thought I’d ask if anyone had run into and corrected a similar situation. And
many thanks to Kirk Wolf for patiently helping isolate where the issue seems to
be.
Situation :
On one particular LPAR I cannot retrieve a
I'm not seeing anything abnormal either. Is there any pattern to the missing
volumes? All on a certain LCU or LCUs? Certain vol-ser patterns? Do you
still have the missing volumes if you switch back to an SMS view instead of a
physical view? You said in your original post that you are seein
Using ISPF 3.4 with PF10 and starting with CCTSD02.** (and / on Display Catalog
Name), check for items catalogued in more than 1 catalog or in other catalogs
than where they should be. Maybe the Catalog Alias is pointing wrong?
---
This all sounds like similar behavior of the option in 3.4 called "Include
Additional Qualifiers". If you don't set the option on you have to wild card
your dataset list. With the option set on you don't have to use wild card to
get a dataset list.
All the code I've ever written using IGGCSI0
I don't follow. I understand the JFCNWRIT flag, as it's documented. I
don't know why you would set it in the first place if you don't have a good
reason for it. But where did this undocumented flag that you're now
setting come from and how does it relate to JFCNWRIT?
sas
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 a
That's what I got from Sri.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IFG0EX0B to increase secondary allocation
[External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links or o
>>But where did this undocumented flag that you're now setting come from
and how does it relate to JFCNWRIT?
Steve,
Looks like you skipped over "There's a long discussion of RDJFCB in
DFSMSdfp Advanced Services."
If you read the "Reading and Modifying a Job File Control Block (RDJFCB
Macro)" sec
Increase the region on the job(s) doing the retrieval. CSI returns the data in
a buffer in *YOUR* private storage, not his.
Depending on the amount of data returned by the request you might/might not
receive a correct answer.
The results can range from success to "not found" (your case) or S878
How is CCTSD02 defined in each master catalog? Are you using MLA?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Bruce Lightsey [bruce.light...@its.ms.gov]
Sent: Thursd
Well, actually I have read that section, although some time ago. I am very
surprised to see that Richard Pinion's post was a direct quote from there!
Sorry for assuming it
So I still have the same question, I just don't hope much for an answer, as
it would presumably have to be answered by whoeve
I want to say - Sri - Thank You for your above and beyond help on ALL the
list’s.
Your mentor would be very proud indeed!
Big shoes to fill and you have done an amazing job!
Best Regards, Doug Shupe
Stay Safe
>> On Jul 9, 2020, at 18:29, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>
>>
>>> But where did this undo
>Can somebody give me a definitive definition of the NOJTC and JTC compiler =
>options in 6.3? I'm not seeing it in the COBOL reference or any COBOL manu=
>al for that matter, yet it shows up on the option list when we compile a pr=
>ogram:
>
>NOFLAGSTD =20
> HGPR(PRESERVE) =20
>NOINITCH
The Wylbur source that I had was all ALC. That is not ALC.
As I recall, the V7 source that we had at ACS, was the OBS/WYLBUR
source that was pretty close to what came from Stanford.
The V8.1 source was just before the dispatch/task control changes
were done, and the SVC99 work.
The V9 sourc
I think you'd be disappointed in FAMS, I still don't think it would help.
We all wonder why it's a secret, because there ain't that much to it.
IEBCOPY and the LISTDSI command pretty much expose all there is.
After looking at your old program, I'd give it at least 50-50 odds for
working with PDSEs
Ah, of course you're right, I'd forgotten that. In ACF2 and Top Secret you can
have UPDATE without READ, for example - it's needed only rarely, but it's
possible with those two - not in RACF.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* Lord, before I commit a sin, it seems to
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 22:47:20 -0400, Steve Smith wrote:
>I think you'd be disappointed in FAMS, I still don't think it would help.
>We all wonder why it's a secret, because there ain't that much to it.
>IEBCOPY and the LISTDSI command pretty much expose all there is.
>
NFS (only, AFAIK) reveals tha
As a novice sysprog, I was asked to write an app (CLIST in those days) that
would enable a user to update a file but not read it. (!) Easy peasy in ASM2.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-54
The QSAM fiddling is what makes GET/PUT work with multiple members. I'm fairly
confident that with z/OS versions of IGGIOBEX , IGGICQE and possibly SAMB the
existing code would work in z/OS, but that would only be for PDS.
Refitting the code for enterprise PL/I would require knowledge of how fi
53 matches
Mail list logo
