W dniu 30.06.2020 o 21:53, PINION, RICHARD W. pisze:
We are attempting, on our QA LPAR, to use the SMS DC attributes,
Data Set Name Type . . . . . : EXTENDED
If Extended . . . . . . . . : PREFERRED
Extended Addressability . . : YES
for all of our sequential data sets. Of several hundred
And what?
I can subscribe to IBM-MAIN using John Doe and some anonymous email.
Will they track the IP from Joh Doe sent the message?
IBM is aware of illegal users of Hercules + some current OS. They also
know a lot of Hercules users are IBMers.
No, it is nothing pro and against Hercules, pira
Didn't IBM nobble Hercules with recent versions of z/OS which had
propriety enablement? Basically kills it!
On 2020-07-01 7:32 PM, R.S. wrote:
And what?
I can subscribe to IBM-MAIN using John Doe and some anonymous email.
Will they track the IP from Joh Doe sent the message?
IBM is aware of il
Are saying that I can't find that kind of information from the SMF Type 14/15
records?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 7:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS Data Class attribute Extended
[External Emai
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 6:33 AM R.S. wrote:
> And what?
> I can subscribe to IBM-MAIN using John Doe and some anonymous email.
> Will they track the IP from Joh Doe sent the message?
>
Using TOR (The Onion Router), it would be very difficult to get to your
specific IP address.
> IBM is aware of
On 2020-07-01 8:26 PM, John McKown wrote:
And what?
I can subscribe to IBM-MAIN using John Doe and some anonymous email.
Will they track the IP from Joh Doe sent the message?
Using TOR (The Onion Router), it would be very difficult to get to your
specific IP address.
haha! How many IBMMAIN us
My fault, I forgot about SMF and (mis)understood you want to examine
datasets itself.
Now I see, you wrote about SMF. To busy...
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 01.07.2020 o 14:19, PINION, RICHARD W. pisze:
Are saying that I can't find that kind of information from the SMF Type 1
W dniu 01.07.2020 o 14:53, David Crayford pisze:
On 2020-07-01 8:26 PM, John McKown wrote:
And what?
I can subscribe to IBM-MAIN using John Doe and some anonymous email.
Will they track the IP from Joh Doe sent the message?
Using TOR (The Onion Router), it would be very difficult to get to you
Some programs will soon no longer be able to do their own TLS encryption.
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/0/877/ENUSZP19-0410/index.html&request_locale=en#sodx
Statements of direction
Removal of native TLS/SSL support from TN3270E Telnet server, FTP serve
/me wonders how many script kiddies have gotten excited to learn there's
apparently a language specifically for creating role-playing games...
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 2:07 AM Timothy Sipples wrote:
> Frank Swarbrick asked:
> >Is Pascal also still supported/used?
>
> IBM VS Pascal (5668-767) is st
"And what?"
How about ... and IBM builds in things to the next release of z/os that
make it completely impossible for it to run on Hercules? Or z/VM? or z/VSE?
Joe
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 6:33 AM R.S. wrote:
> And what?
> I can subscribe to IBM-MAIN using John Doe and some anonymous email.
> Wi
Can anybody suggest goof TN3270 clients for Linux and OS/2?
On Linux I use KDE and would prefer something written for QT or at least X11.
For OS/2 I'd prefer a PM application. In both cases I'd like the ability to
configure both the primary and secondary screen size.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) M
Not sure I have anything for OS/2 but on my Linux systems I use x3270. You
can configure the screen sizes as well as the keyboard layout to suit what
you need and it all runs fine under KDE
Jerry Whitteridge
Delivery Manager / Mainframe Architect
GTS - Safeway Account
602 527 4871 Mobile
jerry.whi
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:47:53 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Can anybody suggest goof TN3270 clients for Linux and OS/2?
>
>On Linux I use KDE and would prefer something written for QT or at least X11.
>For OS/2 I'd prefer a PM application. In both cases I'd like the ability to
>configure both th
Oh - and I seem to remember testing Tom Brennan's Vista3270 under wine -
but that was a LONG time ago and pre the SSL support release.
Jerry Whitteridge
Delivery Manager / Mainframe Architect
GTS - Safeway Account
602 527 4871 Mobile
jerry.whitteri...@ibm.com
IBM Services
IBM Mainframe Discussio
NTAC:3NS-20
Back when we (MF group at my employer) still ran OS/2 we ran IBM's PCOM
and quite liked it. After a while got tired of our desktop group
referring any OS/2 questions they received to me and finally
transitioned over to Windows (and Reflections nee Attachmate).
-Original Message---
On 2020-07-01 11:47, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Can anybody suggest goof TN3270 clients for Linux and OS/2?
On Linux I use KDE and would prefer something written for QT or at least X11.
For OS/2 I'd prefer a PM application. In both cases I'd like the ability to
configure both the primary and second
Hello
We have input file with around 6500 rows as below and would need to build a
control card to update the DB
US1234567897272 -(1st 2 bytes countrycode,next 9 bytes item number ,next 4
bytes PLU nbr)
I need to generate a SQL UPDATE code generator like below. ("?" need to be
pulled from the
Tom, I believe you have nailed it exactly. Those are the two main drivers IMHO.
In addition, there is a *huge* problem (in general, not Z specifically) of
poorly-written programmatic "users" of TLS libraries. If you write a General
Ledger program and the ledgers don't cross-foot, the CFO tells y
I think programs will be able to; IBM just does not intend to spend to maintain
encryption in two places: AT-TLS *and* all of the listed applications.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Wawiorko
Sent: Wedne
On 7/1/20 9:47 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Can anybody suggest goof TN3270 clients for Linux and OS/2?
I use x3270 (or it's text based c3270 alternative) on Linux and PCOM on
OS/2 / ArcaOS for my P/390-E.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
--
> Could some let me know how this can be done using SORT (DFSORT) jcl.
Ron,
Your shop has other competitive product to DFSORT and yet you request the
solution for DFSORT. The control cards may run fine with both products,
but the least you can do is mention the right product. Moreover this is on
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 14:07:08 +0800, Timothy Sipples wrote:
>
>... And obviously IBM markets and supports ..., REXX, ...
>
As long as "support" isn't construed to imply ANSI conformance.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
It wasn't me! I keep forgetting to lock up my computer when I leave my
desk. http://www.mildredbrennan.com/mvs/toms_computer.png
On 7/1/2020 5:53 AM, David Crayford wrote:
On 2020-07-01 8:26 PM, John McKown wrote:
And what?
I can subscribe to IBM-MAIN using John Doe and some anonymous email.
I used to use a 3180 with a customized LOGMODE: 43x80 primary, 27x132
secondary. Not as nice as having a 3290, but certainly better than a vanilla
model 5.
I'm not sure how well screen snapshot as HTML would work; does it pick up allo
of the field and character attributes?
--
Shmuel (Seymour
Thanks! This conversation really helped me understand. And Mike just
pointed out that not only are things headed to AT-TLS, but it may be the
ONLY way to encrypt in the near future.
On 7/1/2020 9:21 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
Tom, I believe you have nailed it exactly. Those are the two main dr
ok thanks a lot Kolusu.fyi , we are using DFSORT and not Syncsort .
Regards
Ron T
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>fyi , we are using DFSORT and not Syncsort .
Well that is good news. On that note then here is the solution.
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=SORT
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SORTIN DD *
US1234567897272
//SORTOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD *
OPTION COPY
OUTFIL BUILD=(C'UPDATE K1GHGMT.RTALABLE_ITKM_SG'
Thanks Tim.
I can't imagine being comfortable writing new code, at least, for a compiler
that has not been updated in 35 years, but maybe that's just me. 🙂
Now that we know what languages are still supported, I am still curious if
anyone out there is actually still using them, and if so, why.
Hercules isn't nobbled. I know a bloke who knows a bloke who runs Hercules
and zOS 2.3. This bloke told me that the other bloke did ADRDSSU volume
dumps and a restore at the other end.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020, 03:47 Tom Brennan wrote:
> It wasn't me! I keep forgetting to lock up my computer when I
We're considering using IPSEC to secure traffic between an internal router and
a CICS application. Can anyone on this list give us any hints, tips or gotchas
they may have from doing something similar themselves.
Thanks in advance.
Robert Crawford
Mainframe Management
United Services Automobil
Comfort isn't the only issue. When they change the law such that the code no
longer complies, then you have to bite the bullet and update it? Lost the
source code? There could be legal consequences. YMMV.
There used to be an operating system with no support for running from an object
deck; the
On 7/1/20 1:49 PM, Crawford, Robert C. wrote:
We're considering using IPSEC to secure traffic between an internal
router and a CICS application. Can anyone on this list give us any
hints, tips or gotchas they may have from doing something similar
themselves.
I can't help.
But I'd love to be
[Default] On 1 Jul 2020 14:43:51 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote:
>Comfort isn't the only issue. When they change the law such that the code no
>longer complies, then you have to bite the bullet and update it? Lost the
>source code? There could be legal cons
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 21:43:42 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Comfort isn't the only issue. When they change the law such that the code no
>longer complies, then you have to bite the bullet and update it? Lost the
>source code? There could be legal consequences. YMMV.
>
For such reasons, programmers
No, it works with z/OS 2.4, well, there is a small issue, but it's being
resolved.
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 20:01:41 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>Didn't IBM nobble Hercules with recent versions of z/OS which had
>propriety enablement? Basically kills it!
>
>On 2020-07-01 7:32 PM, R.S. wrote:
>> And
Maybe you are forgetting the whole backwards compatibility thing.
Do you really think IBM is worried about a bunch of hobbyists writing code or
reliving their youth on mainframes because they have some "lost" revenue in
that area?
You can join developerworks and license z/PDT, which is what I
I forgot to mention that there are directions for copying DASD on the CBTtape
file 659.
Brian
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 05:31:27 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>Hercules isn't nobbled. I know a bloke who knows a bloke who runs Hercules
>and zOS 2.3. This bloke told me that the other bloke did ADRDSSU
Do you mean only that IBM has changed the underlying hardware used to implement
what they called Machine Interface (MI) on the S/38, or do you mean that they
have changed the MI itself?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM
39 matches
Mail list logo
