Please forgive the basic question: I'm a product developer, not a sysprog.
Two part question:
1. What command, panel or report would show the level of paging in a z/OS
system? Ideally I would like something that would show the instantaneous
level and some sort of "period" level (yesterday, last w
1) The RMFMON TSO command will have an option to look at paging rates at that
instant in time. For anything else run batch RMF reports (with the appropriate
options and data selection) for historical reports.
2) In 2019, I'd expect to have zero, or near zero paging rates. The local page
dataset
Thanks. That's a start. Boy, RMFMON has a look and feel from 1987!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Jacobs
Sent: Saturday, November 2, 2019 8:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How display lev
Paging packs should be a minimum of 3X real memory. 1 to back main memory,
then another copy of both for a system dump.
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019, 08:17 Charles Mills wrote:
> Please forgive the basic question: I'm a product developer, not a sysprog.
>
> Two part question:
>
> 1. What command, panel
On Tuesday, October 29, 2019, 01:45:18 PM PDT, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Oh, my. True Blue!
> AOPBATCH removes that limitation and introduces no new limitations (AFAIK?)
> Are you arguing for a semantic distinction between "fixing a problem" a
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 18:53:35 +, Jon Perryman wrote:
> ...
>How many people ignore that AOPBATCH and COZBATCH execute in the callers
>address space and think it's always a good thing! When called from a program,
>you are exposing anything running in the address space to various problems and
>s
On Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 05:50:04 AM PDT, Peter Relson
wrote:
,> If the two parties are running in different address spaces then a
> complaint could only be that the address space is consuming a lot of CPU
> and that is exactly what WLM goals and priorities are for.
Only true if y
On Saturday, November 2, 2019, 12:38:38 PM PDT, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> Doesn't any program object invoked by // EXEC PGM= execute in the initiator's
> address space?
Sorry. I forgot to say EXEC PGM=AOPBATCH is safe.
> Is there the same exposure for any user-coded program that uses LINK
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 23:03:16 +, Jon Perryman wrote:
>
>> Doesn't any program object invoked by // EXEC PGM= execute in the initiator's
>> address space?
>
>Sorry. I forgot to say EXEC PGM=AOPBATCH is safe.
>
That might be true if AOPBATCH were installed with AC=0
in an authorized library.
>
We submit a batch job with two steps: first step IEFBR14 with the dataset name
allocated DISP=OLD, second step IDCAMS to do ALTER dsname NEWNAME(newdsname).
The job ENQs on the dataset name so new TSO allocations for it fail, and the
job waits until all TSO users using it have freed it or logge
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 22:30:47 -0500, Tim Hare wrote:
>We submit a batch job with two steps: first step IEFBR14 with the dataset
>name allocated DISP=OLD, second step IDCAMS to do ALTER dsname
>NEWNAME(newdsname). The job ENQs on the dataset name so new TSO allocations
>for it fail, and the job w
> Is there a WTO module which can write a message (highlight message) on a
> console based on the JCL previous condition code?
I believe you are asking about the sample exit IEFACTRT on the CBTTAPE which
issues a WTO for each step completion message. You can change this to issue the
message a
On Saturday, November 2, 2019, 07:35:08 PM PDT, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> Sorry. I forgot to say EXEC PGM=AOPBATCH is safe.
> That might be true if AOPBATCH were installed with AC=0 in an authorized
> library.
AOPBATCH and COZBATCH must be linked AC=0 because the shell runs in problem
st
13 matches
Mail list logo
