Re: TS7770 official ?

2019-10-27 Thread Gadi Ben-Avi
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/9/877/ENUSZG19-0099/index.html&lang=en&request_locale=en -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2019 7:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: TS7770 of

DFSORT SUM FIELDS

2019-10-27 Thread ITschak Mugzach
I have a sort filed of (1,2,ch,a) and sum flelds =(3,4,zd,5,6,zd). there are many input records with same sort field value. I would expect to have a single record in the output. however, I get two. what am i missing? ITschak -- ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security

Re: DFSORT SUM FIELDS

2019-10-27 Thread Sri h Kolusu
>>>sum flelds =(3,4,zd,5,6,zd). ITschak, I am pretty sure that would result in overlapping error as your summing field at position 3 for 4 bytes extend up to position 6, but your second sum field starts at position 5 which overlaps the first sum field. You should be getting an ICE125A message.

Re: DFSORT SUM FIELDS

2019-10-27 Thread ITschak Mugzach
Sri, This was just an example. I am trying to summarize by sort keys. there might be ten records with same sort keys. I expect a single record in output file (such as DUPKEYS SUM in syncsort). However, the result is that I get several records with same keys in the output. More specific: OPTION E

Re: DFSORT SUM FIELDS

2019-10-27 Thread Sri h Kolusu
>>> More specific: > OPTION EQUALS > SORT FIELDS=(6,5,ch,a,53,3,ch,a) > sum fields=(245,15,ZD,123,11,ZD) > > As the are about 15 records with same sort keys I want to summarize all > into a single record. Is this possible, or should I write my own program? ITschak, That should be easily summed.

Re: DFSORT SUM FIELDS

2019-10-27 Thread ITschak Mugzach
Yes. I am running a batch version. Can send you the file and job so you can see yourself ). please confirm this option. The statements are as in my sample. I would expect a single combination for sort keys summarised in sortout. בתאריך יום א׳, 27 באוק׳ 2019, 14:31, מאת Sri h Kolusu ‏: > >>> Mo

Re: Sample SMF records

2019-10-27 Thread Pierre Fichaud
Gord, I am logged into the secure area at https://dtsc.dfw.ibm.com/ Where do I go next ? Regards, Pierre. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu w

Re: DFSORT SUM FIELDS

2019-10-27 Thread Sri h Kolusu
>>Can send you the file and job so you can see > yourself ). please confirm this option. Please send as text files. I would also like to see your joblog too. Thanks. Kolusu DFSORT Development IBM Corporation -- For IBM-MAIN su

Re: DFSORT SUM FIELDS

2019-10-27 Thread Mike Schwab
use an inrec statement to enlarge numeric fields so you don't exceed the size of the field. On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 7:08 AM ITschak Mugzach wrote: > > Sri, > > This was just an example. I am trying to summarize by sort keys. there > might be ten records with same sort keys. I expect a single reco

Re: Sample SMF records

2019-10-27 Thread Gord Tomlin
On 2019-10-27 09:00, Pierre Fichaud wrote: Gord, I am logged into the secure area at https://dtsc.dfw.ibm.com/ Where do I go next ? Regards, Pierre. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, se

Re: DFSORT SUM FIELDS

2019-10-27 Thread ITschak Mugzach
After some private emails, files and job output, Sri noticed that some of the sum fields where too small to host the accumulated values generated by the sort sum statement. Fixed that and it as expected. Tx to Sri and others that suggested solutions. The original code was in different language tr

Re: Return code X'20' 32 from CELQPIPI INIT_MAIN

2019-10-27 Thread scott Ford
Joe, Look at a Storage Obtain with checkzero=yes then a rc is x’14’ , it might very similar case Scott On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 6:31 PM Joseph Reichman wrote: > Hi > > > > I copied the example from the LE guide for 64 bit Virtual Storage > Addressing > with the exception of zeroing service rtn

Re: Return code X'20' 32 from CELQPIPI INIT_MAIN

2019-10-27 Thread Joseph Reichman
The doc says • Application program support running in the PreInit environment. The PreInit table contains the names and entry point addresses of each routine that can be executed within the PreInit environment. The applications defined in the PreInit table must be able to run as AMODE 64 (wit

Re: Return code X'20' 32 from CELQPIPI INIT_MAIN

2019-10-27 Thread scott Ford
And what AMODE and RMODE is the Assembler code ? On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 6:55 PM Joseph Reichman wrote: > The doc says > > > • Application program support running in the PreInit environment. > The PreInit table contains the names and entry point addresses of each > routine that can be executed >

Re: Return code X'20' 32 from CELQPIPI INIT_MAIN

2019-10-27 Thread Joseph Reichman
AMODE 64 rmode any BROWSEIBMUSER.DBGR.DLLLIB Row 022 of 022 Command ===> Scroll ===> CSR Name PromptAlias-of Size TTR AC AM RM _ TEST64A

Re: Return code X'20' 32 from CELQPIPI INIT_MAIN

2019-10-27 Thread Joseph Reichman
Here is all the relevant code besides the assemble and link but its AMOD64 RMODE ANY Thanks * LGR15,CELQPIPI_EP Address of CELQPIPI E.P.

Re: Return code X'20' 32 from CELQPIPI INIT_MAIN

2019-10-27 Thread Joe Monk
Where are your calls to CELQPIPI? Joe On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 6:05 PM Joseph Reichman wrote: > AMODE 64 rmode any > > BROWSEIBMUSER.DBGR.DLLLIB Row 022 of > 022 > Command ===> Scroll ===> > CSR >

Re: Return code X'20' 32 from CELQPIPI INIT_MAIN

2019-10-27 Thread scott Ford
Exactly, CSECT, SAM ..etc On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 8:37 PM Joe Monk wrote: > You seem to be missing a bunch ... > > Look at this example: > > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ceeam00/coreyex.htm > > Joe > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 7:03 PM Joseph Reichm

Re: [EXT] Re: zOS 2.4 migration guide

2019-10-27 Thread Andrew Rowley
On 26/10/2019 5:49 am, Mark Charles wrote: Hi Martin - can you explain to a non-JAVA person how I would check the Heap settings and what some proper settings might be? I know my setup is still at IBM defaults. I'm skeptical that it would be a Java heap issue. Garbage collection is a memory