We have a customer trying to allocate a data set on some kind of virtual
tape device and the dynamic allocation is failing
with 0218/: "user does not have volume mounting authorization". Using
the same user id he is able to allocate the same
data set from a TSO session. We suggested he give t
Lizette, there's another caveat there too. A procedure is identified by its
member name, but the contents of that library member may not necessarily
contain the member name.
An unrealistic example:
.PROCLIB(PLURGH) contains:
IEFBR14 PROC
IEFBR14 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
IEFBR14 PEND
Batch 3.14 searc
Some possible reasons for this error are:
- The dynamic allocation tried to use a VIO-eligible unit, but the data
set name was not a temporary dsname (DSN=&&dsname).
- The dynamic allocation tried to put a data set with a non-temporary
dsname (DSN=dsname) onto a real DASD volume but
Joe, thanks for the prompt reply. I think your suggestions don't apply here
because the customer sent us the output of a batch job which analysed the tape.
The interesting part was the allocation messages, the DD statement was:
//TAPEIN DD DSN=RC.MD.SQDS.NPDC.PKLHIST.H2000,DISP=OLD
IEF285I
Thank you for responses.
Unfortunately there is nothing in SASLOG resembling diagnostics to explain what
is wrong with the rejected record.
I ran IFASMFDP to copy the file, and there were no errors. Number of records
matches so none were dropped, and the breakdown of record types matches as wel
Robin,
I took your comments to mean your file server was having problems
allocating an output file. Thats why I gave the requirements for an output
file for dynamic allocation ...
If its a VTL (i.e. disk pool), and the DSN is specified, there are two
requirements:
a. the VOLSER must be specified
Joe-
Apologies for the confusion, we are trying to read the data set. The customer
has not been clear about the hardware involved but the job output they sent us
did not have to specify a volser on the DD statement. IIRC, on our own system
we used to have catalogued data sets residing on tape wh
Dear list:
I'd like to know if DFSORT makes use of zIIP as SYNCSORT does.
Please do not consider DFSORT with DB/2 utilities where zIIP is used.
If anyone could help I really appreciate that.
Thanks !!
Regards,
Gilson
--
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:33 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 14:02:20 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
> >...
> >??? Please explain that. Do you mean, you want to add the members as an
> input into that JCL? Why not just concatenate t
Look in File 312 for member LSTPROC which will dynamically get the proclibs
that are defined to JES2 - it doesn't support dynamic proclibs but it should
get you the static ones.
If you use JES3 then check out LSTPROC3.
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website: http://www.lbdsoftware.com
"Worry more about your
I have two mod-9s dedicated to JES2 spool. The first volume is just 43%
fill and the second volume is 99% full. I would like to expand my spool
space to use the full area on the first volume. (No other datasets are
on these volumes.)
It looks like I can do this simply by using:
$TSPOOL(JESSP1)
Usually the missing record would be on a different SMF file because the
first one filled up. You might look at the first / last record of when the
file was copied off.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:42 AM Beesley, Paul wrote:
> Thank you for responses.
>
> Unfortunately there is nothing in SASLOG res
In recent versions of SDSF, you can use the "PROC" primary command to show the
JES2 PROCLIB datasets and then use the "SRCH mask" command to search the
displayed PDS datasets for a member name pattern.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
Hello,
With respect to the unresolved references, have you included the LE libraries
in your SYSLIB concatenation? More info can be found here:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ceea200/cllexx.htm
>However the most troubling is the C function I exporte
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 07:43:09 +0400, Jake Anderson wrote:i
>
>Is there a file within CBTTAPE to find a specific proc among the JES2 procs
>?
This seems to be motivation for an RFE. Perhaps a combination of
MSGLEVEL and TYPRUN that would show PROC resolution and optionally
suppress/allow execution.
The LSTPROC command, written in REXX, found on File 312 of the CBTTAPE, will
find the JES2 defined Proclibs, then allocates them to temporary DDnames of
$PROCxxx, then invokes ISRDDN followed by the ONLY $PROC to limit the display
to just those DDnames. With ISRDDN you can use any of its comman
Thanks I am not quite sure what I am missing
This is the last thing I ran last night
Here is the output
z/OS V2 R3 BINDER 07:28:21 TUESDAY JULY 9, 2019
BATCH EMULATOR JOB(IBMUSER$) STEP(LINK) PGM= HEWL
IEW2278I B352 INVOCATION PAR
We need to expand the MCDS and are leaning towards using a mod-27 volume to
resize and keeping a single cluster. I've done some reading and have not seen
anything about whether this can be done. Anybody out there done this?
Hervey
> I'd like to know if DFSORT makes use of zIIP as SYNCSORT does.
Gilson,
DFSORT can off-load to zIIP processors on behalf of DB2 utilities, but NOT
otherwise. At this time, IBM has NO plan for enabling DFSORT to exploit
zIIP for regular DFSORT jobs. IBM realizes DFSORT remains a prominent
comp
We run with a single MOD-27 cluster with no problems. Looking to take that to
a MOD-54 and then split into multiple clusters.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Hervey Martinez
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 11:06 AM
To:
Hi Hervey!!
I wouldn't expect it to be more complicated than shutting down HSM everywhere,
defining a new larger MCDS and then REPRO the old dataset into the new one.
Then either change the dataset name of the MCDS in the startup procedure, or
rename the datasets, old->backup, new->old and rest
> IEW2322I 1220 1IMPORT CODE64,'SYSADATA','openadata__FPc'
Based on this statement, can I make the assumption that you are building 64-bit
code?
> IEW2469E 9907 THE ATTRIBUTES OF A REFERENCE TO CEETEST FROM SECTION SYSADATA
> DO
Is CEETEST 31-bit or 64-bit? They need to be the same AMODE
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Chuck Kreiter
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 11:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Expanding DFHSM MCDS
We run with a single MOD-27 cluster with no problems. Looking to take that to
a MOD-54 and t
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacobs
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 11:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Expanding DFHSM MCDS
Hi Hervey!!
I wouldn't expect it to be more complicated than shutting down HSM everywhere,
def
Dll source code
I think you're getting this because you are adding the sidedeck to your bind.
This step is not necessary because the DLL that you are building provides
openadata, not referencing it. You would add the sidedeck when binding other
programs which want to call openadata.
I am getti
The invalid VBS segment message is completely inside SAS and MXG has no way to
detect
because SAS has already moved on to the next valid VBS segment.
The most common cause that I've seen is when one of the dump jobs to a B37 Out
of
Space, and that last record was not truncated, and the error occ
Static, dynamic or both?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Rob
Scott
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 9:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Findproc CBTTAPE ?
In recent ver
> I don't think SUBMIT * works in REXX as it would in CLIST
No; a CLIST operates from the stack and can do things that REXX can't support.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
John Mc
We are getting this message even though there is a LOT of contiguous space
available in the storage group.
We get this periodically and adding a volume seems to relieve the immediate
request.
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subs
What would happen in our shop was the space request was for a small
primary and small secondary (eg (TRK,(1,1))) and multiple volumes.
The program writes the data, uses up all the extents, goes to the next
volume and uses up all the extents, and repeats until it runs out of
the number of volume onl
Thanks Mike.
This is a new allocation and there are many volumes it could extend to.
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I see you said a new allocation so of course I can't migrate it.
there are many volumes available in the storage group.
it doesn't request multiple volumes..
why does it not search the group until it gets the requested space?
Elaine
Elaine, I'm sure you saw that the IGD17272I will tell you the allocation
request (REQUESTED SPACE QUANTITY = {KB MB}). I'm sure you looked at that
request size and at the time you looked the storage group had space.
Could there be an issue that at the time of the failure the storage grou
Is your SMS routines setting the data set as multi-volume? If not then you
need to do an IDCAMS ALTER on the data set to add multiple volues.
Brad Wissink| Sr. Systems Programmer
Sammons® Financial Group Member Companies
4350 Westown Pkwy | West Des Moines | IA 50266
Phone 515-267-2735 | ext. 33
What storage class is it assigned to, and what is the VOLCNT? If the
VOLCNT is 1 then it must be allocated on 1 volume.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:13 PM Elaine Beal wrote:
>
> I see you said a new allocation so of course I can't migrate it.
> there are many volumes available in the storage group.
Could someone put in an RFE? When a dataset is deallocated (usually
step end), there is a disposition message. I would like to see added
to the message the ### Volumes, ### Extents, ###,###,###,### Tracks.
To help in cases like this.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:13 PM Elaine Beal wrote:
>
> I see y
So the key for this message is
REQUESTED SPACE QUANTITY = {KB|MB}
What was in this message.
Typically I find this message occurs when the volumes being selected do not
have sufficient space for allocation. Also because the space parms are not
tuned to handle daily usage vs. high water mar
In our shop, the magic bullet is:
1) Dataclass has 1 volume, with dynamic volume count of 20.
2) Dataset is (or can be made) PSE.
As others have said, check the allocation - both in the JCL and in the SMS
data class used - if any. If the DSN is grossly underallocated in the J
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 03:18, Robin Atwood wrote:
> We have a customer trying to allocate a data set on some kind of virtual
> tape device and the dynamic allocation is failing with 0218/: "user
> does not have volume mounting authorization". Using
> the same user id he is able to allocate the
Hi. If you have IBM File Manager then the (FM) FM Enhanced Search facility
can be used to search the PROCLIB data sets for a string and return a
"smart" list of members containing the string. For z/OS releases prior to
2.2 SDSF is required. Look for the description of the EFind command in the
follo
Just a kindly reminder, this survey will be closed on July 22, 2019. Welcome
your feedback.
Regards, The z/OSMF Team
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:20:05 +0800, Peter Van Dyke wrote:
>Hi. If you have IBM File Manager then the (FM) FM Enhanced Search facility
>can be used to search the PROCLIB data sets for a string and return a
>"smart" list of members containing the string. For z/OS releases prior to
>2.2 SDSF is requi
>Hi. If you have IBM File Manager then the (FM) FM Enhanced Search
>facility can be used to search the PROCLIB data sets for a string and
>return a "smart" list of members containing the string. For z/OS
>releases prior to
>2.2 SDSF is required. Look for the description of the EFind command in
Elaine,
There can be enough space in the SG, but was the *requested* space available,
on 1 volume, at that very moment?
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Elaine Beal
> Sent: 09 July, 2019 21:08
> To: IBM-MAI
Hi,
I received the following messages when I process the JCL:
• IGD330I ERROR OCCURRED DURING CBRXLCS PROCESSING-
FOR DATA SET VOLUME REQUESTED BY SPECIFIC VOLUME SERIAL IS A SCRATCH VOLUME
THE FAILING VOLSER IS A00195
•
Hi,
I was asked by our DB2 DBA to direct one of the DB2 ARCHLOGS to tape - Virtual
tape on a TS7760.
I changed our SMS STORCLAS routine to direct the correct files to the TAPE
Storage class.
That DATACLAS routine was also changed to associate the correct DATACLAS to the
file.
I tested using I
46 matches
Mail list logo
