Itschak,
The information is in the NED, which you can display with DS QD,devn,RCD.
Unfortunately, the model information the emulated IBM device, but the vendor ID
and serial number should get you halfway there.
+4 (4)
6 Bytes
Device Type, in EBCDIC.
+10 (A)
3 Bytes
Device
“2107-900” I’ve always felt to be a little non-descriptive. It doesn’t
really document the HDS model.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 20 May 2019, at 09:55, Ron Hawkins wrote:
>
> Itschak,
>
>
>
> The information is in the NED, which you can display with DS QD,devn,RCD.
>
>
>
> Unfortuna
Thanks Ron.
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:55 AM Ron Hawkins
wrote:
> Itschak,
>
>
>
> The information is in the NED, which you can display with DS QD,devn,RCD.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, the model information the emulated IBM device, but the
> vendor ID and serial number should get you halfway there.
>
Martin,
Agree. It's about time z/OS provided for something other than just IBM
controllers.
However, it would be somewhat redundant, as it is the RCD and RDC that document
supported feature information for the OS, and not the emulated model.
If you are running Hitachi's MAR you can get the HTC
Hi All,
I've been assigned to evaluate VTF Mainframe (VTFM) at our shop and it is
already installed and running.
Looking for things that have been set "under the hood" I can see its subsystem
has four SSI routines:
No. 9, "Notify write-to-operator message".
No. 10, "Notify operator command".
N
Robert,
Thank you- duh, read the whole error message:(
I was looking at only the first xxx reason code.
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the me
This will require unload/delete/allocate/reload of the original dataset. I
presume you mean either Extended Addressability or Extended Format.
In either case, these are attributes of the DATACLAS which can only be modified
at dataset allocation time.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM M
If you have specific questions about zCX, feel free to post them here.
I'll do my best to answer them, or find someone else who can.
As far as the technical setup of zCX, it's essentially a z/OS hypervisor
(like z/VM) that is only configured to run Linux. The Linux guest OS is
running Docker,
... in what ways are they similar, and what ways are they different?
Is the world better off with SMP/E-like structure for code, or is z/OS etc.
better off with Git-like structure?
- Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
MARKSANDSPENCER.COM
Unless otherwise stated ab
That's like comparing a airliner to a boarding ramp.
sas
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:29 AM Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh <
vignesh.v.sankaranaraya...@marks-and-spencer.com> wrote:
> ... in what ways are they similar, and what ways are they different?
> Is the world better off with SMP/E-like structure
Fine, didn't intend to say they were meant for the same thing, wanted to start
a convo about both..
If you have a few minutes, can you expand on your statement.. ?
– Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent:
Git is designed as a source code management system, while SMP/E is a
package manager. Git is analogous to Subversion, CVS, and RCS, while
SMP/E is similar to RPM.
On 5/20/19 9:49 AM, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh wrote:
Fine, didn't intend to say they were meant for the same thing, wanted to star
What about the PRE/SUP/REQ etc. control statements in PTFs... isn't that maybe
a basic SCM?
Don't know if it allows for line-level diff as in Git, but does even Endevor
allow/do that, for example?
– Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
If youre trying to run under TSO, did you compile with the INTERRUPT option?
Joe
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:37 PM Mike Stramba wrote:
> I'm trying to compile and run the PL/I ON ATTENTION interrupt example
> from the PLI prog guide ver 4 r4 (pg 542 / GI11-9145-03)
>
> The code contains an ON
My understanding of Git is fairly superficial, having only read about it
and not actually used it, but it would appear that the orientation of
git is primarily one of files/modules, tracking collections of those and
the assigning of versioning levels for the entire collection of files.
Distributio
Thanks for writing this up Joel!
Is it fair to say that SMP/E is not strictly error-fix anymore, since there are
now INCremental releases from CA (for example), which allow for the
introduction of product feature(s)?
If it's RSU1903 or PUT1903, sure, that's fixes, but with the growth of
Continuo
On Mon, 20 May 2019 13:28:58 +, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh wrote:
>... in what ways are they similar, and what ways are they different?
>Is the world better off with SMP/E-like structure for code, or is z/OS etc.
>better off with Git-like structure?
>
I never learned Git. I've long seen simil
Correction: This team bid on one System/360 Model 20 but ended up winning a
pair of Model 20s and a System/370 Model 125. Amazing! The Model 125 was
pre-XA but has virtual storage and either 96K or 128K of main memory. I've
changed the subject line to reflect what they've discovered.
They recovere
Some PTFs were applied to our production z/OS 2.3 environment this weekend, and
since the FTP server was cycled the log messages are no longer being written to
the console.
FTPLOGGING TRUE is still set in the SYSFTPD config file.
Any thoughts?
--
Tom,
Can you provide a link?
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pinnacle
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2019 10:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Vote for RFE 48916 to create LE STORAGE report when program abends
F
On May 20, 2019, at 11:20 AM, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh
mailto:vignesh.v.sankaranaraya...@marks-and-spencer.com>>
wrote:
On the other end, GitLab (a provider of Git) is now offering package management.
Are the 2 products/technologies converging?
Hypothetically, if they are, is Git better than S
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 7:56 AM Anthony Giorgio
wrote:
> If you have specific questions about zCX, feel free to post them here.
> I'll do my best to answer them, or find someone else who can.
>
> As far as the technical setup of zCX, it's essentially a z/OS hypervisor
> (like z/VM) that is only c
One of the model 20s is more or less a parts car, probably used to
keep the production one running. They intend to use it for the same
purpose.
The 125 seems only to be the processor, as there were no S/370 era
peripherals with the lot, other than a 3504 with the top shaved off,
apparently used as
On 5/20/2019 12:55 PM, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
Tom,
Can you provide a link?
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pinnacle
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2019 10:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Vote for RFE 4891
Our Systems group has resolved this issue. (I don't know the cause or the
resolution at the moment.)
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 10:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: FTPLOGGING not worki
Good call... the INTERRUPT option is the likely culprit (the O.P. can say
for sure). Now maybe someone could explain why such an option exists.
Would you like an 'EOF' option to specify whether EOF should be detected?
TSO is a very-multi-tasked environment. Each command is ATTACHed as a
subtask,
You can run z/Linux on Hercules or Z mainframe. Go to
https://hub.docker.com/search?q=&type=image&architecture=s390x .
Select IBM Z as the hardware and there are 2001 images ready to download.
Pick one with the combination of database and language support you want.
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:00 PM
No and no.
TSO does not support concurrent execution of tasks. When an unauthorized task
calls an authorized command, the TMP doesn't let the unauthorized task continue
until the authorized task completes.
The default for attention is to allow the terminal user to decide what to do,
e.g., TES
Is a Pier Cub better than a rowboat? Neither can do what he other does.
If you're trying to deal with dependencies, SMP is better than anything else
that I've seen. If you have independent developers updating the same source
module, SMP is useless.
When the only tool in your toolkit is a pipe,
Comparing SMP to git is like comparing a hammer to a screwdriver; each is good
at what it is designed for and terrible at what the other does well.
SMP is designed to manage dependencies, and does that well. It does not have
good support for multiple updates of the same element, while merging up
I'd say that the first step is to run a trace and find out what your terminal
simulator is actually sending when you click on ATTENTION. Ideally, it will be
the aid for PA1, exactly one time, but life is full of surprises.
Does your ATTENTION key work as expected with other applications?
--
Sh
Well said. Git was primarily designed to address deficiencies in other
source code management systems. It has excellent support for branching
and merging, which were a major pain point in Linux kernel development.
Git is simply not designed to handle package management duties.
On 5/20/19 3:45
Thanks.
On Mon, May 20, 2019, 14:16 Mike Schwab wrote:
> You can run z/Linux on Hercules or Z mainframe. Go to
> https://hub.docker.com/search?q=&type=image&architecture=s390x .
> Select IBM Z as the hardware and there are 2001 images ready to download.
> Pick one with the combination of databas
No, it's not a "good call".
I do have the INTERRUPT option enabled.
At least that's what the compiler listing says.
What code does the INTERRUPT option generate ?
Mike
On 5/20/19, Steve Smith wrote:
> Good call... the INTERRUPT option is the likely culprit (the O.P. can say
> for sure). No
On 5/20/2019 3:37 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
No and no.
TSO does not support concurrent execution of tasks. When an unauthorized task
calls an authorized command, the TMP doesn't let the unauthorized task continue
until the authorized task completes.
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.e
What PTF stands for (Program Temporary Fix) is of course no longer
accurate -- as long as you stay on the same product release level they
are neither "temporary" nor confined to "fixes". Many small functional
enhancements are implemented using PTFs and such PTFs are also part of
some RSU and PUT
Is this possible?
If so, what SMF record can I use to find the following
JOBNAME/PROC Used/Date/Time/LPAR
Note: No SAS /no MXG
Only IFASMFDP or DAF
Thanks
Lizette
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Most in smf 30. Not sure about proc name. I've used a decent cbt reporting. No
lpar per se but smfid is almost the same thing.Charles
Original message From: Lizette Koehler
Date: 5/20/19 5:04 PM (GMT-08:00) To:
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: How to Identify PROC name in S
[Default] On 20 May 2019 17:27:51 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
charl...@mcn.org (Charles Mills) wrote:
>Most in smf 30. Not sure about proc name. I've used a decent cbt reporting. No
>lpar per se but smfid is almost the same thing.Charles
PROC name is not available in any SMF record that I am
I got attention processing mixed up with something else. TSO shouldn't
normally kill the command on an attention.
S13E & S33E are "normal" in many cases (outside of TSO - I'm not sure
within TSO), as it's sometimes easier to just DETACH rather than coordinate
a "proper" subtask shutdown. So that
https://ibms360.co.uk/?page_id=22
Apologies if this has been here already-if so, I missed it.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IB
41 matches
Mail list logo
