The 3375 (CKD brother of the 3370 FBA) was attached thru a 3880 storage
control. There were A,B, and D units. The D units were the tails and the A
units were the heads. The D units provided a second path but couldnt be
attached to the same 3880 as the A unit of the string, nor could that 3880
be at
The languages that probably should be supported are C/C++, COBOL, FORTRAN,
Java, and PL/1.
The train for z/OS-provided Fortran, Cobol, and PL/I mappings left long
ago.
I see no realistic possibility that such mappings will be provided in the
future.
XLC already provides a DSECT to struct c
There were inboard and outboard channels as well depending on the box, aka
cpu used..
Scott
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 6:46 AM Joe Monk wrote:
> The 3375 (CKD brother of the 3370 FBA) was attached thru a 3880 storage
> control. There were A,B, and D units. The D units were the tails and the A
> un
It's environment would support doing disk I/O, as it is unlocked primary.
The issue would be that you are in an arbitrary address space, thus you would
not likely have the file you wish to read/write from allocated.
On Fri, 17 May 2019 12:21:07 -0400 scott Ford wrote:
:>All:
:>
:>Here is my d
Elardus/Binyamin:
I was referring to System Logger, but as you and Binyamin pointed out ,
depends on the address space and the
rules laid out by the IBM code. This is fine, I am probably going to 'bite
the bullet' and use a Dataspace .
I did some digging through Google postings from the Listserv a
Hi Peter
I still don't find the updated 228 file in CBTTAPE.
Could you please send me offline if you have now ?
Peter
On Fri, 17 May, 2019, 7:18 PM Peter Vander Woude,
wrote:
> I just submitted to the cbt site, an updated file 228, that works
> correctly.
>
> The problem lies in how the clis
http://www.cbttape.org/updates.htm
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 4:31 AM Peter wrote:
>
> Hi Peter
>
>
> I still don't find the updated 228 file in CBTTAPE.
>
> Could you please send me offline if you have now ?
>
> Peter
>
> On Fri, 17 May, 2019, 7:18 PM Peter Vander Woude,
> wrote:
>
> > I just sub
This particular exit only looks at the commands issued (from consoles or jobs,
etc.) so the overhead is pretty small. I wanted to do a lot of optional work
at the time though so it made more sense to code things so that they told me
what to look at and I only looked at those commands (instead o
Thanks Peter and Mike
On Sun, 19 May, 2019, 8:54 AM Mike Schwab, wrote:
> http://www.cbttape.org/updates.htm
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 4:31 AM Peter wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter
> >
> >
> > I still don't find the updated 228 file in CBTTAPE.
> >
> > Could you please send me offline if you have
