Hi
Is there anyone in the group who still uses Cleanup 3.5 product ? The
product invocation is filling with 0C4 and I want the Manual to look into.
It would be great if someone can share the manual.
Jake.
--
For IBM-MAIN subsc
Hi
We have activated CBU for our DR site and it remains for 10 days. Now This
is nearing for expiration.
Is it possible to activate another CBU token without IPLing the LPAR ? Is
there a way to activate CBU dynamically ?
Hardware : z14 zr1
Peter
Hi
Will there be any grace period before it expires?
On Mon, 13 May, 2019, 12:01 PM Peter, wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have activated CBU for our DR site and it remains for 10 days. Now This
> is nearing for expiration.
>
> Is it possible to activate another CBU token without IPLing the LPAR ? Is
> ther
Re grace period. I believe its 2 days.
However, my personal knowledge is a bit rusty now. Try this manual:
z Systems
Capacity on Demand User's Guide
SC28-6943-01
Regards
Parwez Hamid
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Peter
Sent: 13 May 2019 0
Parwez
I was going through the z14 Zr1 guide . I don't see about grace period for
CBU test Activation.
I am I missing something ?
On Mon, 13 May, 2019, 1:38 PM Parwez, wrote:
> Re grace period. I believe its 2 days.
>
> However, my personal knowledge is a bit rusty now. Try this manual:
>
> z
Peter,
As I said, I am bit rusty on the actual T&Cs (over the years there have been
some changes). The 2 days 'grace' period might related to CBU (for DR) rather
than CBU Test. In both cases a warning is issued that that 'CBU' duration is
going to expire. I myself don't have access to IBM's Re
Using Create and then specifying option 2 you can enter the dcb and space that
you want and the data will be stored in the newly created data set. Or you can
specify a target data set that already exists, either sequential or a PDS
member.
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website: http://www.lbdsoftware.com
Multiple CBU records may be active at the same time. CBU resources can be
activated, deactivated, or the activation level changed concurrently (from an
LPAR perspective).
I assume you're using shared processors only and z/OS. Usually, from z/OS you
may need to configure additional logical proces
CBU test activation is 10 days max for each test.
A CBU REAL ACTIVATION (you are in a DR situation) would be up to 90 days.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 5:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV
Concatenation of FB and VB isn't going to work. I prefer VB, but changing it
after the fact is a user hostile move.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tim
Hare
Sent: Sunday, May 12
SPARC? I was shocked when I found out that the failure of a sing processor
could bring Solaris down.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Phil Smith III
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2019 2:
Physical security and software security are important, but so are procedures
and processes. If, e.g., you use default passwords, your personal can be taken
in by sicial engineering, then you're toast no matter how good your OS is.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
__
This has made me wonder. One thing I like about UNIX (or Windows) files is
that they don't impose any structure on the data. Of course, OTOH, this
could be viewed as a negative. Anyway, I wonder if it would be nice to have
a "subsystem", similar to GPSAM (file #290 on CBT), which could "bridge the
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:26 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> SPARC? I was shocked when I found out that the failure of a sing processor
> could bring Solaris down.
>
What music does a "sing" processor run? {grin}. I am not sure, but doesn't
the same thing happen with Intel / Windows (or Linux)?
>
BTDT,GTS. See if you can get an indemnification clause in the contract for
failure to provide temporary keys within the promised window.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Laurence
c 'sing' 'single'
It may happen with m$ but it doesn't happen with z/OS and I suspect that it
doesn't happen with Linux (anyone here know what RAS Linux has?)
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:41 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> c 'sing' 'single'
>
> It may happen with m$ but it doesn't happen with z/OS and I suspect that
> it doesn't happen with Linux (anyone here know what RAS Linux has?)
>
Yes, we have had a TCM fail. I was almost called a liar when I told the
I've worked for several large, mature shops. Large means many users who need
TLC; some will be quite influential within the organization. Mature means lots
of processes deeply embedded in the infrastructure; some will be considered
Tier 1 production.
The problem with FB vs. VB--mostly in scrip
Hi Skip,
You said: "... Vendor distribution is usually FB--SMPE pretty much
requires that ...".
Can you prove that "SMPE pretty much requires that"?
I think that this assertion is false.
Regards.
David
On 2019-05-13 12:04, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> I've worked for several large, mature shops. La
And?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2019-05-10 o 20:05, Bill Johnson pisze:
https://www.share.org/blog/mainframe-matters-how-mainframes-keep-the-financial-industry-up-and-running
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, May 10, 2019, 2:00 PM, R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2019-05-10 o
>>Concatenation of FB and VB isn't going to work. I prefer VB, but changing
it after the fact is a user hostile move.
Utilities like File-Manager are quite capable of handling concatenation of
VB with FB datasets. As long as your VB dataset is the first dataset in
concatenation you can copy the c
TCM? That must be going back a bit. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/Martin
On Mon, 13 May 2019 10:35:47 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>This has made me wonder. One thing I like about UNIX (or Windows) files is
>that they don't impose any structure on the data.
>
+1
Will OS ever liberate users from interacting with low-level attributes
of devices which nowadays exist only vir
> There could also be a corresponding FTOV which similar options, perhaps
> specifying a TRUNC=??, which would truncate the any trailing ?? bytes in
> the input data.
>
John,
DFSORT does have a parameter to remove any trailing character. You can use
OUTFIL'S VLTRIM parameter to create VB output r
On Mon, 13 May 2019 16:04:04 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>
>The problem with FB vs. VB--mostly in script management involving CLIST or
>REXX--is as old as MVS. For most of affected shops, the conundrum is the
>reverse of OP's. Vendor distribution is usually FB--SMPE pretty much requires
>tha
john.archie.mck...@gmail.com (John McKown) writes:
> Yes, we have had a TCM fail. I was almost called a liar when I told the
> Windows people that the z simply switch the work transparently (on the
> hardware level) to another CP. They were shocked and amazed that we could
> "hot swap" a new TCM in
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:57 AM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2019 16:04:04 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> >
> >The problem with FB vs. VB--mostly in script management involving CLIST
> or REXX--is as old as MVS. For most of affected sh
On Mon, 13 May 2019 06:15:42 -0500, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
>Using Create and then specifying option 2 you can enter the dcb and space that
>you want and the data will be stored in the newly created data set. Or you
>can specify a target data set that already exists, either sequential or a PDS
>
I haven’t researched SMPE on this question for a long time. VB REXX elements
may be legal now. If you have any, that proves your case.
OTOH it doesn't matter much because if there is even one each of FB and VB
elements, you still have the same problem with concatenation.. This will not
work:
Cross posted to IBM-MAIN and MVS-OE lists.
I can see no documentation in the z/OS Unix Command Reference whether
"nextfile" or "exit" are supported as action statements in z/OS "awk" scripts.
Can anyone point me to any other documentation that tells me whether these
actions are supported or not
Never mind, I found the documentation on "exit" and "next" but not "nextfile".
Apologies for the wasted bandwidth.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 6:37 PM
To: IBM-
On Mon, 13 May 2019 22:12:45 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>I haven’t researched SMPE on this question for a long time. VB REXX elements
>may be legal now. If you have any, that proves your case.
>
They always have been legal. IIRC, when Rexx first came to TSO/E v2, circa
advent of MVS/XA,
I
On 2019-05-13, at 16:40:41, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
> Never mind, I found the documentation on "exit" and "next" but not "nextfile".
> Apologies for the wasted bandwidth.
>
It appears to be a GNU feature. I don't know whether Rocket Ported Tools
supplies GNU awk.
I try to stay within POSIX
On 5/13/19 9:25 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
SPARC? I was shocked when I found out that the failure of a sing
processor could bring Solaris down.
It really depends on the machine.
Some machines are meant to allow processors to fail, be replaced, be
added, and brought online while the workload co
On 5/13/19 9:46 AM, John McKown wrote:
Yes, we have had a TCM fail. I was almost called a liar when I told the
Windows people that the z simply switch the work transparently (on the
hardware level) to another CP. They were shocked and amazed that we
could "hot swap" a new TCM into the box witho
If you've got a C compiler you can build "gawk" yourself. It's already
been ported to z/OS and I can see there are z/OS specific commits as
recently as a few months ago.
https://github.com/redox-os/gawk
On 14/05/2019 6:40 am, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
Never mind, I found the documentation
36 matches
Mail list logo
