Jake Anderson wrote:
>When we say ML1 I understand it's a dasd ?
Usually yes, but you as HSM admin has the final say.
>So if it a HSM managed where can I list it or do we define a set of pool ?
Look in your ARCCMDxx parmlib member for this statement like this example.
ADDVOL ?? UNIT(3390)
Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed
the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming that
it may never see the light of day here.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Marshall Stone
Se
IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB
jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell script
way. I had the basic security set-up carried out within minutes - the worst bit
was changing all the SAMPLIB jobs to stick an OWNER on th
Yea, I should have been a bit clearer. Security setup for the actual STC's is
not unreasonable. It's trying to determine the correct access for various
levels of security for different role types (general user, sysprog, sysprog
admin, etc). The other is that zOSMF requires bits of operatin
There is nothing that fault analyzer can do about this. When the system is
told not to take a dump, it does not take a dump.
>I'm not going to get permission to do this.
Permission to do what? Ask someone who issues "CANCEL" (especially for
something of yours) to include the "DUMP" operand?
Re
Hi,
The VEHSYNC job in the tapetools package has DD cards for various Tape
Management Systems.
We use Control-M/Tape from BMC formerly known as Control-T.
There are two DD's the look like they belong to Control-T, CNTLT60 and CNTLT61.
Does anyone know what these DD's should point to?
Thanks
Gad
It seems odd to me that MVS needs all those "built-in" SLIPs to suppress
dumps. I would expect most of those are abends that didn't request a dump
in the first place.
sas
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 7:42 AM Peter Relson wrote:
> There is nothing that fault analyzer can do about this. When the syst
Almost none. The only thing ISTR is CSSMTP is not very happy with square
brackets "[" and "]".
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: CSSMTP
I am a Db2 Systems
The shop where we are installing z/OSMF is CA-TSS also. That makes it a mild
mess to setup.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
TSS here also, and luckily my TSS sysprog has been able to either find the TSS
cookbook for z/osmf security setup or has been able to translate RACF to TSS, I
agree, still a mess to setup correctly.
still getting issues with some 2.2 security setup due to the security group
does not understand
Hi Gadi,
Long time no speak 😊
If we're not mistaken, you should use CNTLT60 for Control-T V6 MDB or CNTLT61
for V6.1 (and higher).
There was a change in the MDB format in 6.1.
HTH,
Yifat
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: Wednesday,
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:36:59 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote:
>z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure.
>
>Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work
I don't have an answer to that question, but you might want to
consider the following, from the z/OS 2.4 preview announcement.
h
What was in the charset on the content-type header field?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Allan Staller
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subje
I don't recall. This was circa z/OS 1.11 when I first migrated to CSSMTP.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 8:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSSMTP
What was in the charset on the content-ty
:( well isn't that special -
now not just planning 2.3 now 'I' have to start to look at 2.4 with no
traditional migration guide? I sure hope I don't need internet access from my
ServerPac system.
thanks IBM ! looking to retire earlier that later now
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message --
W dniu 2019-04-16 o 19:44, Michael Pantoja pisze:
Anybody heard anything about Oracle's future plans for the VSM? VSM 7 came out in 2016
and there's been plenty of RIFs since then as they continue their focus on
"Cloud".
My personal opinion: it's moribound. Still under sales, but no plans for
W dniu 2019-04-17 o 06:57, Timothy Sipples pisze:
So far here's the list of currently available FICON-attached/ECKD storage
units that fit within the 16U Reserved feature of the IBM z14 ZR1 and
LinuxONE Rockhopper II machines, in alphabetical order by vendor:
Dell EMC PowerMax 8000
IBM DS8882F
L
The biggest problem with migrating to CSSMTP would be not doing it.
If you try to stick with SMTP, when you upgrade z/OS you'd have nothing as SMTP
would stop working.
Mike Wawiorko
_
Also you are going from basically a POP mail server with full functions to a
spool offload program that just forwards files to your corporate mail server.
In V2.3 and above the mail program is no longer found, but we did cheat and
copy the module from V2.2 and it worked in the lab under V2.3.
If you send an email to the team that supports this, they are very helpful.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Gadi Ben-Avi
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:56 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: TapeTools VEHSYNC job
>
> Hi,
>
what program is not found?
looks like out network guy has an SMTP address space started using MVPMAIN, I
see this program still in my 2.3 TCPIP.SEZATCP loadlib
is there another program in the call charin that is no longer there?
also from the migration Guide Share presentation I have sez.
That’s interesting - The TCPIP.SEZALOAD on these z/OS V2.3 systems do not have
MVPMAIN load module anymore. Could someone have copied it?
MS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.
Hi Marshall, my I/P guy is steplibing to TCPIP.SEZATCP - I found it there
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Marshall Stone"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:40:05 AM
Subject: Re: CSSMTP
That’s interesting - The TCPIP.SEZALOAD on these z/OS
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3389659/all-is-a4-ok.html
Regards,
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1 USNR-Retired, 1969-1991
Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access in
Hi
Would anyone know if I could run debug tool
As a batch job producing an instruction trace of a program thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
I solved the brackets issue by specifying:
TRANSLATE Ibm-037 in the config parms.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 9:05 AM Allan Staller wrote:
> Almost none. The only thing ISTR is CSSMTP is not very happy with square
> brackets "[" and "]".
>
> HTH,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe
I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR CODE
32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34).
Any idea?
ITschak
--
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring
for Legacy **| *
---
I found, and downloaded the cookbook too. Again, fine for setting up the STC
security, but trying to figure out some level of role based functionality, and
who should see what, is the hard part.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: W
https://www.ibm.com/support/libraryserver/download/ikj2m211.pdf
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: what is racinit error 32?
The return codes are not described in the msg manual...
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:27 PM Steve Beaver wrote:
> https://www.ibm.com/support/libraryserver/download/ikj2m211.pdf
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of I
Are you trying to CREATE, CHANGE or DELETE?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: what is racinit error 32?
The return codes
Might the code be displayed in decimal in which case it is equivalent to
x'20' which then indicates RACF is not active.
Lou
--
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
- Unknown
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:08 PM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> I am trying to login to tso and get msg
see the msg. it is during login.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:40 PM Steve Beaver wrote:
> Are you trying to CREATE, CHANGE or DELETE?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 20
that's true. racf is not active, it is a tss lpar. however other users can
login. it must be a tso issue as job submition under this user work well.
The user is NOT defined to UADS. I know that if I will define the user to
UADS it will work, but am trying to understand what is missing.
ITschak
On
Is there a TSS TSO segment defined for that userid?
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:50 PM, ITschak Mugza
If the user is NOT defined in UADS then don't you need to define a TSO
segment in TSS???
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Su
I am in the same boat here - clear as mud
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:23:46 PM
Subject: Re: z?OSMF
I found, and downloaded the cookbook t
The user has facility(tso) and a tso segment with only TSOLSIZE. from some
reason, add(xxx) tsoproc() doesn't show in list.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:54 PM Mark Jacobs <
0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Is there a TSS TSO segment defined for that userid?
>
> Mark Jacob
found it. thanks all. TSOPROC called TSOLPROC, tss ADD command accepts both
but only TSOLPROC work.
ITschak
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:56 PM Cieri, Anthony wrote:
>
> If the user is NOT defined in UADS then don't you need to define a
> TSO segment in TSS???
>
>
> -Original Message---
Do I just point it to the MDB?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Oren, Yifat
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TapeTools VEHSYNC job
Hi Gadi,
Long time no speak 😊
If we're not mistaken, you should use CNT
If you google z/osmf top secret or racf or acf2 it will bring you to a CA
webpage. And the jobs are in a SMP/e library
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:58 PM
To: IBM-MA
I think my teammate went to the CA Site, I don't expect TSS rules for usage to
be in SMP/E format ?
I"ll check with him, I don't recall him saying they were.
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Beaver"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:08
Well, "amazing" is a signed variable. What do you do when IBM tells you that a
machine check after pressing RESTART is a software error? What do you do when
you put the 168 in Single Step mode, press RESTART and again get a machine
check, without affecting the "software error" fairy tale? Amazin
I just found the jobs in CAKOJCL0. Do a srchfor OSMF on the library. Looks
like maybe CA has made some inprovements. Will have to take a closer look at
the various members.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Wednesday, April 1
Now - they are not all correct but they are a reasonable start
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z?OSMF
I just found the job
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:23:30 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>What was in the charset on the content-type header field?
>
I know VM's SMTP performs ASCII<->EBCDIC conversion without adjusting
charset. I would hardly be surprised if other mainframe mailers misbehave
likewise.
-- gil
--
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:06:20 -0400, Roberto Halais wrote:
>I solved the brackets issue by specifying:
>TRANSLATE Ibm-037 in the config parms.
>
Suppose you have one user partisan to IBM-037, and another IBM-1047.
Can you satisfy both?
>On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 9:05 AM Allan Staller wrote:
>
>> A
Hi,
This can be done with Debug Tool. The following JCL is for a batch job that
runs a COBOL program and has Debug Tool write a trace of all statements and
labels executed. It also shows the values of all referenced variables. The
trace is written to the INSPLOG DD.
//VANDYKET JOB (ACCTG),'DT JOB
Thanks
Just curious, on every upgrade does anyone runs FVP(functional verification
program) of HSM ? Just to be sure HSM functions as expected ?
I was going through the FVP and has lot of great information .
On Wed, 17 Apr, 2019, 11:07 AM Elardus Engelbrecht, <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wr
Hi,
I looked all over, but couldn't find the address.
Do you know what it is?
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 5:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TapeTools VEHSYNC job
If you send an
Hello Peter,
I cannot find program ADSTAT anywhere on my system.
And I do have the IBM DEBUG products installed.
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:37:10 +0800, Peter Van Dyke wrote:
>Hi,
>
>This can be done with Debug Tool. The following JCL is for a batch job that
>runs a COBOL program and has Debug Too
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>I don't know about any candidates to this category, but when we add HDS,
>we have all current vendors of mainframe disks.
No, that's not correct. Infinidat also markets FICON-attached ECKD storage
(evidently not in 16U or smaller physical sizes), and there might be
others
Bruce Hewson wrote:
>I cannot find program ADSTAT anywhere on my system.
This is a custom compiled program.
Two clues: STEPLIB is own private library and part of the PARM is '/TEST ...'
which tells me the program was compiled with debugging statement inserted in
the program and this program i
53 matches
Mail list logo
