Sorry I don't know except that all HMC's are now at the same microcode
level. As it's the weekend I will try to find out next week. That's when
we are going to try again actually in the data centre to avoid any firewall
issues.
We didn't actually fix the firewall issue - that's still outstanding.
Just a thought.
Although its possible to use some of the older HMC H/W (I think its FC 0092 -
zBC12 had this and FC 0095), even with the correct level of HMC code, these do
not support some of the HMC Enhancements (GA2) which were delivered with System
Driver level 36 and HMC/SE Level 2.14.1
P
I would stop now and look at IBMs recommend unit addressing scheme.
Trust me what you are doing is going to make it harder to keep track of
things.
And even harder on those that come after you.
Rob Schramm
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 7:44 AM Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
> HI,
> I have a computer (Our DR com
Ooo ooo ooo ..me..send me in coach!!
USS USS USS *sounds of crowd chanting*
USS is UNIX SYSTEM SERVICES!! Unless it is USS unformated system
services. And last time i looked they are pretty different.
So for the ridiculously pendantic.. *sound of a raspberry*
Really?!?
In the very few times
We replaced two z12s late last year with a z14 and a z13s. I didn't do the
actual work, but all 'migratable' HMC data was copied over to the new CECs
ahead of the push-pull swap out. This includes profile data and
userids/passwords. The z14 includes some new options that need to be set
manually
Out of interest how did you copy the data from the old hmcs to the new
ones? I'm not sure my post got to the list but the approach our tech
people are using is to use the HMC for the 12 to populate the HMCs for the
14 and so far the old HMC cannot discover the new one. That is a potential
show sto
