Hi,
I would like to create a job that will tell me if all virtual volumes on one
member of a TS7760 grid have been copied to another member of the grid.
I know how to use BVIR to get a list of the status of all virtual volumes on
each grid.
Is there a program, possibly part of the TapeTools pack
Sorry, the layout of the CACHE CONTENTS BVIR records is documented in: TS7700
Bulk Volume Information Retrieval V4.1.2a
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
> Sent: 27 February, 2019 13:11
> To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
> Subject: RE: Tapetool quest
Out of interest: why do you want to check this? Don't you trust the replication
or did you just change managementclass attributes?
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi
> Sent: 27 February, 2019 13:2
We have two TS7760's. No physical tapes.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 2:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tapetool question
Sorry, the layout of the CACHE CONTENTS BVIR
We are in the initial stages of the implementation, so I want to make sure that
everything is OK
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 2:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tapeto
It's likely that you can do this with /LIBRARY REQUEST,... commands from the
host z/OSsystem.
- Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: 27 February 2019 12:42
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL
Both sub directories (SMPHOLD and SMPPTFIN) were created by me.They reside in
My USS Home directory as specified in my RACF OMVS Segment..I can also use
OEDIT from within OMVS to edit and save a file..The batch job uses my userid to
do the OCOPY..There are no ICH408I messages in the SYSLOG nor J
esst...@juno.com wrote:
>Both sub directories (SMPHOLD and SMPPTFIN) were created by me.They reside in
>My USS Home directory as specified in my RACF OMVS Segment..I can also use
>OEDIT from within OMVS to edit and save a file..The batch job uses my userid
>to do the OCOPY..There are no ICH408
You need to augment your PATHOPTS. Try adding
PATHOPTS=(OWRONLY,OCREAT,OEXCL)
_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.
I see CPUtime as 4093.12, GCPUtime is 2187.06 and Ziiptime is 2.17, that's
not adding up since all other times, other than accumulated time is zero
There is no reason these should add up, although I don't have the
information about where the "source" is for GCPUTime and "zIIP time", but
I ca
No more assumptions on my part, so what tools would show the correct time(s)
for real time monitoring if not SDSF ?
RMF?
Omegamon?
And now that you throw Java in the mix or USS spanned tasks I don't think any
real time monitor can account for all CPU time GCPU and zIIPTIME
I'm thinking none
Yes, there are jobs in the tapetool utilities (COPYRFSH) that will allow one to
sync clusters within a grid, there's a whitepaper on techdocs that explains the
process.
We've been working this process for about a month now. We went from a two way
grid with a third stand alone VE to a four way g
We are migrating from a TS7740 to a TS7760 and have the same issue.
For all kind of reporting, I process the BVIR records with SAS, the layout is
documented in TS7700 Statistical Data Format V412_20171116.
In this case, I request the Cache Contents of both clusters and check each
tape's presenc
Hello.
The COPY AUDIT option in BVIR will do this for you. Builds a file showing
which clusters have copies as required. We use REXX to look at the file and
see any issues.
ThanksRick
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh
Is the last release planned to be 2.3 or 2.5?
Dennis Roach, CISSP
AIG
Identity & Access Management | Infrastructure Services
2929 Allen Parkway, America Building, 3rd Floor | Houston, TX 77019
Work: 713-831-8799 Cell: 713-591-1059 (cell)
dennis.ro...@aig.com | www.aig.com
Away Schedule
---
On 2/27/2019 6:44 AM, Roach, Dennis wrote:
Is the last release planned to be 2.3 or 2.5?
z/OS 2.5 (or whatever it will be called) aka "the release following z/OS
V2R4" will be the last one to include the JES3 feature.
That means a) IBM has until September 2023 to fully bring JES2 up to
JES3
I missed the following 2.4.
What are they doing about exit compatibility?
Dennis Roach, CISSP
AIG
Identity & Access Management | Infrastructure Services
2929 Allen Parkway, America Building, 3rd Floor | Houston, TX 77019
Work: 713-831-8799 Cell: 713-591-1059 (cell)
dennis.ro...@aig.com | ww
>That means a) IBM has until September 2023 to fully bring JES2 up to
>JES3 standard
Is JES3 really considered by all to be better than JES2 ??
I know it was 20 years ago, but JES3 gave me nightmares, whereas JES2 never has.
From an application point of view.
Thanks,
Tom Savor
-
Well,
I was informed 20 years ago JES2 is future for JES and JES3 is not.
End of JES3 cannot be called "unexpected".
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2019-02-27 o 16:54, Ed Jaffe pisze:
On 2/27/2019 6:44 AM, Roach, Dennis wrote:
Is the last release planned to be 2.3 or 2.5?
z/OS
JES3 will not start your job until datasets are released and space is
available. JES2 starts your job then waits until the datasets are
available, and you can run out of space.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:18 AM Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)
wrote:
>
> >That means a) IBM has until September 2023 to f
On 2/27/2019 8:18 AM, Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta) wrote:
That means a) IBM has until September 2023 to fully bring JES2 up to
JES3 standard
Is JES3 really considered by all to be better than JES2 ??
I know it was 20 years ago, but JES3 gave me nightmares, whereas JES2 never has.
From an applicat
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 13:58:30 +, Jousma, David wrote:
>You need to augment your PATHOPTS. Try adding
>
>PATHOPTS=(OWRONLY,OCREAT,OEXCL)
>
(Long ago) I got "Permission denied" from SMP/E when I specified OWRONLY.
SR. WAD. Rationale was that SMP/E first opens *every* output data set for
INPUT
After further research earlier today I modified
PATHOPTS=(OWRONLY,OCREAT,OEXCL), and the job was successful. Thank You..
-- Original Message --
From: "Jousma, David" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: BPXF105E
Date: Wed, 27 Fe
Do you the think the z/OS overall ecosystem and the platform is made stronger
or weaker by getting to one JES?
I think that for a core part of the mainframe platform rationalizing to a
single standard configuration of the OS from two options makes it more
sustainable. Vendors and IBM can avoid
https://www.mxg.com/thebuttonman/html/button589.htm
In a message dated 2/27/2019 2:43:43 PM Central Standard Time,
samuel.knut...@compuware.com writes:
Do you the think the z/OS overall ecosystem and the platform is made stronger
or weaker by getting to one JES?
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 20:43:17 +, Knutson, Samuel wrote:
>Do you the think the z/OS overall ecosystem and the platform is made stronger
>or weaker by getting to one JES?
>
>I think that for a core part of the mainframe platform rationalizing to a
>single standard configuration of the OS from t
In the unlikely event that IBM actually includes all of the features of JES3 in
JES2, then I think that it will be stronger, albeit with a painful transition.
If they do as they have so often done and provide only partial equivalents,
then it will be negative.
I'm assuming that, e.g., user exit
I would consider JES3 superior to JES2, but such questions rarely have a
consensus answer.
Is TSO really considered by all to be better than CMS? Is REXX really
considered by all to be better than Perl? Is P/I really considered by all to be
superior to C? I couldn't even get consensus on C vers
IBM was the consensus of one
Sent from my iPhone
Sorry for the finger checks
> On Feb 27, 2019, at 15:50, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> I would consider JES3 superior to JES2, but such questions rarely have a
> consensus answer.
>
> Is TSO really considered by all to be better than CMS? Is REXX
When IBM broached this restriction at SHARE a few years ago in a closed
technical session, I was verklempt. We had several LPARs way smaller than the
proposed minimum. IBM's argument was that a potpourri of pesky problems were
found to stem from puny LPAR sizing. As it is we've had no trouble me
On 2/27/2019 1:31 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Stronger, but with the caveat that if the consolidated product provides for
either
JES2-like or JES3-like behavior at the option of the site or of the individual
user
the burden on vendors remains.
Both JESes are full of options today. Nothing chan
Don't want to start a War between the 2 versions, but I'm curious as to why you
believe JES3 to be superior to JES2 ?? Is this from a Systems perspective ??
Maybe JES3 does far many things that JES2 doesn't IDK. But for me, I'm not a
System guy, I'm a technical guy that has worked with many a
Well, as an example, JES2 relies on the Initiator to serialize jobs, and the
Initiator relies only on dataset name. JES3 can serialize jobs taking the
volume serial numbers into account. But the issue isn't which is better, the
issue is whether "Is foo really considered by all to be better than
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 23:36:59 +, Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta) wrote:
>
>... To fix this, it required us to split many jobs in half, some even
>more...the run total got to be somewhere around 6500+ jobs in total. But we
>had to build dataset create jobs that were parm cards to a utility to crea
Hi all,
I want to make you aware that every PDF in the z/OS V2.3 library was just
refreshed to update the visual style and link coding. Because of the link
coding changes, clicking on a link in an old-style PDF to a new style PDF will
not work, and vice versa. So, to ensure that all cross-book
Susan Shumway wrote:
>I want to make you aware that every PDF in the z/OS V2.3 library was just
>refreshed to update the visual style and link coding.
Excellent! Thanks for sharing this good news.
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
-
Hello Group,
I was unable to find any forum to post my query related to CA- View ( SAR),
So posting here. If any one of us have faced such issue before.
Message on Console :
26 IEF455D MOUNT SARO05 ON 0FB2 FOR SARO SARO OR REPLY 'NO'
IEC507D E 0FB2,SARO05,SARO,SARO,.SARTAPE.T860
27 IEC507D
It looks like something changed last week.
The message is normal, but usually replied to automatically. Usually by your
tape management system.
Do you have CA1? Maybe some hooks, that do the automatic reply, have not been
installed.
Google IEC507D and view the CA hits that give you an indicatio
38 matches
Mail list logo
