Ron,
Forgive me, but it sounds like you are a little out of your depth with this.
Z13 doesn't allow a CTC? Since when? AFAIK, you can have a FICON CTC on ANY
z hardware.
"TCPNJE has been working for nearly 3 years and then all of a sudden it isn't
and networking says it's a mainframe prob
Thanks
I would like to change the CHPID for a series of UCBs.
Do I need to recable it or using the same port I can assign a different
CHPID ?
Regards
Peter
On Wed, 30 Jan, 2019, 8:34 PM R.S. Simply run HCD and play.
> You cannot destroy prod data (it will be WORK IODF), so feel safe
> playing
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of retired mainframer
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 8:26 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: DFHSM FIXCDS before start-up?
>
> Why would overwriting the CDSs during a CDS backup be a problem? You stil
Hi,
We use hold commands in the ARCCMD parm member to prevent an lpar from
recalling, but it's allowed to put requests on the common queue (this was
because we used to be short on tape drives).
E.G.
ONLYIF HSMHOST(2)
HOLD RECALL(TAPE)
ONLYIF HSMHOST(2)
Peter
I am not sure what you are trying to achieve. The CEC has physical Channels
called PCHPIDs which map to logical CHPIDs.
You have some UCBS connected via a CHPID. Why would you want to change
them?
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 11:49, Peter wrote:
> Thanks
>
> I would like to change the CHPID for a
W dniu 2019-02-05 o 10:48, Peter pisze:
Thanks
I would like to change the CHPID for a series of UCBs.
Do I need to recable it or using the same port I can assign a different
CHPID ?
You can do the following:
a) change cabling to CUs (not devices) - but why?
b) change PCHID/CHPID numbering - t
You can zeroize individual domains from the SE as well. Both are on the Crypto
Configuration panel.
I don't know of any way to do it from ICSF.
Greg Boyd
www.mainframeCrypto.com
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 17:42:18 +0100, R.S. wrote:
>AFAIK there are ways to zeroize CryptoExpress engines using HMC/SE
Why would you want to do this?
I presume you have the health-check recommended 4 backups (or more).
If the current backup is 'N', the next backup would be taken to N+1.
N will not be overwritten for 3 additional cycles. More than long enough to
make a backup copy.
To answer your question about fi
I'm running z/OS 2.2 @ RSU1805 level and one of my users is trying to use the
JES2 schedule statement; from all the doc I found the AFTER=jobname should be
valid @ 2.2 but they are getting a JCL error during testing, my test had the
same results;
3 // SCHEDULE HOLDUNTL=('09:50','02/05/20
More than once on this forum, folks have asked about when Enterprise COBOL V4.2
will enter EOS. This announcement has the details:
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/2/897/ENUS919-022/index.html&lang=en&request_locale=en
V5.1, V5.2 will be EOS May 30, 2020.
Are you sure you have the syntax correct? Here is a jobgroup I actively use
to run my z/os cloning jobs. I am at V2.3 however.
//TESTG JOBGROUP ERROR=(RC>4),ONERROR=FLUSH
//TESTA GJOB
//TESTB GJOB
// AFTE
No David, I'm not sure, the only testing I've done was with the holduntil,
looks like the jobgroup is required for the AFTER= statement by the looks of
your working example
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To
Sorry about the wrap. That wasn’t how I sent it.
_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717
-Original Messa
No problem, it didn't wrap on my end, looks good, thanks David
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 10:11:05 AM
Subject: Re: JES2 SCHEDULE statement
Vince,
I found it easier to put my responses below after each of your questions.
Thanks,
Ron McCabe
Mutual of Enumclaw
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Vince Getgood
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2019 1:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: H
I regenerate my DR restore jobs at the end of the daily FDRABR DR back-up jobs.
We use DFHSM for migration and application ack-and restore. When practicing the
DR recovery, I need to restore DFHSM using the most recent CDS back-up.
So, this scenario is that I've just restored all CDS (and JRNL)
The ESSY is rather odd …
If I use ABITS=64 it this request gets a RC 12.
When I list the symbol I get
symbol 00. ASID(X'0026') LENGTH(X'1000') AREA(symbol) DROP
If I issue "L symbol DSPNAME(symbol)" and list the symbols again a mysterious
"X" symbol is defined …
X
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 17:10:52 +, McCabe, Ron wrote:
>
>I found it easier to put my responses below after each of your questions.
>
Good idea. But why not start each of your responses on a new line? And
distingush original text by ">" quotation marks or indention? Does not
MS-Exchange, which a
In article <7271721887429173.wa.zos.jes2gmail@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote:
> The ESSY is rather odd ???
> If I use ABITS=64 it this request gets a RC 12.
> When I list the symbol I get
>symbol 00. ASID(X'0026') LENGTH(X'1000') AREA(symbol) DROP
> If I issue "L symbol DSPNAME(symbo
Thanks for your help Don.
I finally did get the symbol defined correctly …
symbol 00. ASID(X'0046') DSPNAME(symbol) LENGTH(X'1000') AREA(symbol)
DROP
I was priming the ESSY with a DSECT=NO version and it had a -1 as the asid
word. I was only updating the
Paul Gilmartin wrote, in part:
>Good idea. But why not start each of your responses on a new line? And
>distingush original text by ">" quotation marks or indention? Does not
>MS-Exchange, which appears to be your mailer, support such things?
A nit, Gil: Exchange is an MTA, not an MUA. Ou
In my z/OS 2.02 version of MVS JCL Reference, there is NO "AFTER=" option on
the SCHEDULE statement.
There is an "AFTER" JCL statement:
"AFTER statement
Purpose: Use the AFTER JCL statement, along with GJOB and JOBSET
statements, to define jobs and sets of jobs that must execute in a par
KC got me again, when searching for the JES2 Schedule Statement, 2.3 was the
default, I should have stuck with my 2.2 books I have local
my user ran another test based on the examples David provided, it 'worked' with
the kaviot,
HASP JOBGROUP activation requires Z22 checkpoint level
I had
>>HASP JOBGROUP activation requires Z22 checkpoint level
Forgot about that. We did it long ago. Nothing to worry about, just do the
test activate first to make sure your checkpoint is large enough.
_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Eng
yeah, I have z22 active on my test image, and the $Tactivate shows it would be
successful in prod, I'm just procrastinating - thanks again
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tu
replying to myself, I see that my user and myself were confused about SCHEDULE
and BEFORE and AFTER, not related. jobgroup is what I think he's looking for
and after I activate z22 level we can test.
thanks Al and David
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Carmen Vitullo"
Apologies: The V5.1 and V5.2 date is April 30, 2020.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
ITYM a series of devices; HCD defines device numbering independent of any OS,
while the UCB is a control block specific to z/OS (and its relatives).
You can change the logical CHPID associated with a physical CHPID without
re-cabling. What are you really trying to do?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Me
LISTSERV and Netnews are both good; Stack Exchange is not bad; most of the
other options run from bad on down.
I find both gmail and outlook to be pathetic.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on
It is possible to convert ENQ with SYSTEMS to RESERVE, but the performance
ramifications are unacceptable.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Tony Harminc
Sent: Monday, February 4,
Since 2008, forwarding to Bob has been possible only via a literal
"ether net" connection. Unfortunately, the IBM mail network does not
have such a connection. We wish it did. We as well find understanding
how to use some of the IPCS macros to be challenging.
> It is. It has the feel of an
In article
you wrote:
> Since 2008, forwarding to Bob has been possible only via a literal
> "ether net" connection. Unfortunately, the IBM mail network does not
> have such a connection. We wish it did. We as well find understanding
> how to use some of the IPCS macros to be challenging.
So, the idea of running DFHSM with a a limited ARCCMDxx as part of the CDS
restore job is not viable!
Message ARC0009I DFSMSHSM STARTUP ATTEMPT FAILED, NOT A STARTED TASK happens
So, I guess I have no choice but to document it as a task to be performed post
1st IPL of the recovered system
And,
Hi,
Thanks all for the response
We are shutting down our z114 box and have just few weeks so wanted to try
learn something out of it and it's an opportunity which I won't get as we
have already moved our production to a new z hardware.
So trying to explore some activity which can give me some go
34 matches
Mail list logo
