Re: [SPAM] Hmc for z as a virtual appliance?

2019-02-02 Thread ITschak Mugzach
Hi Tony, The last sentence in your email catched my attention " I don't see that it has any close relation to IBM's mainframe OSs and their security issues." I used to have a client that claims his systems are 100% secure. We attacked this client from his partner who was connected over CICS connec

Re: [SPAM] Hmc for z as a virtual appliance?

2019-02-02 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2019-02-02 o 01:42, Tony Harminc pisze: On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 09:29, R.S. wrote: IMHO the topic is HMC for zPDT. Unfortunately zPDT does not have HMC in any form, real or emulated. It's not mainframe, it's only emulation. No, zPDT *is* a mainframe. It implements a permitted subset of th

Re: [SPAM] Hmc for z as a virtual appliance?

2019-02-02 Thread Mike Schwab
Well, the IBM S/360 and earlier had control panels. This IBM S/370 is still running a 3277 operator console. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HETSEyIPuv0 On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 5:00 AM R.S. wrote: > > W dniu 2019-02-02 o 01:42, Tony Harminc pisze: > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 09:29, R.S. wrote: > >>

Re: [SPAM] Hmc for z as a virtual appliance?

2019-02-02 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2019-02-02 o 12:05, Mike Schwab pisze: Well, the IBM S/360 and earlier had control panels. This IBM S/370 is still running a 3277 operator console. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HETSEyIPuv0 Yes, control panels, but not HMC. Note, the control panel is rather SE, not HMC. Not to mention

Re: [SPAM] Hmc for z as a virtual appliance?

2019-02-02 Thread ITschak Mugzach
Our zPXT is no issue here, mainframe or not. It is all about HMC! בתאריך שבת, 2 בפבר׳ 2019, 13:16, מאת R.S. : > W dniu 2019-02-02 o 12:05, Mike Schwab pisze: > > Well, the IBM S/360 and earlier had control panels. > > This IBM S/370 is still running a 3277 operator console. > > https://www.youtub

Re: ISPCFIGU not being used.

2019-02-02 Thread Peter Relson
I know nothing about ISPCFIGU but if you say it works when ISPLLIB then you should consider that that is where it needs to go. It is fully possible that an application searches only a specific DD for a module. Being in the LNKLST works if that is the first thing searched. I'd guess that ISPF