> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: 30 January, 2019 20:36
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Tape Mount Mangement
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:30:34 +0100, R.S. wrote:
> >
> >My other i
We have seen this while z13 migration to z14 specially with the cable swaps for
OSA ICC weren't showing active with SE and eventually with the POR (activate)
for CEC brought them back online . It wasn't in the list as a activity to do
but now with every cable swap we added POR activity ...not pr
DYNDISP is recommended with THIN INTERRUPT for Non dedicated CF CPU ...like for
our sandbox/dev systems we have non dedicated and we keep it thin for them
while for production which has CF CPU dedicated it's good idea to keep it OFF
...You may like to look at Z14 Configuration setup guide which
As illustrated you can't touch the PROD iodf since as soon as you try to make
any changes HCD will force you to create WORK IODF . same goes with the IOCDS
Slot which won't let you override the existing active iocds slotanyway so
your question regarding creating a duplicate(with different pa
Not sure if you have message seen as "+IZUG019E The AUTOSTART_GROUP NONE
doesn't match the one x specified for AUTOSTART in IPL."
if you have IZU=(00,xx) specified in the IEASYSxx member where some of the
parms you are overriding...if so look at the very recent APAR opened "PH07842"
after w
What it means is that the storage was in a task that went away. When you
split, it is using the storage again.
IPCS does not display unallocated virtual pages (as they do not really exist).
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:14:37 -0600 Wendell Lovewell
<01e9c0ee0673-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
(This thread has got quite long so pardon me if I repeat something someone
else said.)
If you must run a PRODUCTION Coupling Facility LPAR on SHARED engines I
would generally recommend turning DYNDISP off for that one LPAR. Set it to
THIN for the non-Production ones it's forced to share with.
Mark Jacobs wrote:
>Tomorrow marks my last day at Time Customer Service as the closing of the
>division is completed.
Oh, this is bad!
>After 8573 days, what a long strange trip its been.
That is about 23 years and 6 months! With or without leap days? ;-)
>I've close to retirement, but wou
Marc,
Good Luck. I am certain you will find what you are looking for.
Never Give Up.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:33 AM Mark Jacobs - Listserv <
mark.jac...@custserv.com> wrote:
> Tomorrow marks my last day at Time Customer Service as the closing of the
> division is completed. After 8573 days, what
Difficulties looking for a new employer?? Just give it ... time .. oh wait
Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
Humana Inc.
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Humana.com
(502) 476-2538 or 407-7266
-Original Message-
F
can't find Mark's original post...but, when I was laid off in 09 I found it
difficult to find anything until I was contacted by IBM Global Services, at the
time it was strictly work from home, communications was via email and
conference calls, and a laptop provided by global services. my team an
I want to say thanks to everyone. My experience / knowledge has gaps so
when I have doubts or questions i come to this great repository of
experience to ask the questions.
Scott
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 4:17 PM scott Ford wrote:
> Don exactly. I am having to reverse engineer a situation that wa
I just started (first time) zOSMF.
I want to use Network Configuration Assistant, however the icon is gray
and plugin unavailable. Uninstalled task - IUZG437I.
I tried to use Import Manager to import this plugin. It ask me about
property file. I have no idea what to provide.
Neither online help
I had the same issues @ 2.1 - it's a little easier with 2.2 and parameter
driven
IIRC you can use the install process to add plugin if your 2.1
with 2.2 and using the IZUPRMxx member I just added
PLUGINS(COMMSERVER_CFG
WORKLOAD_MGMT
RESOURCE_MON
CAPACITY_PROV
SOFTWARE_MGMT
ISPF)
Carme
Radoslaw,
In SYS1.PARMLIB(or wherever you keep your IZUPRMxx members), update the
PLUGIN's statement.
PLUGINS(INCIDENT_LOG,
COMMSERVER_CFG,
WORKLOAD_MGMT,
RESOURCE_MON,
CAPACITY_PROV,
SYSPLEX_MGMT,
Brian and Ravi Thank-you. What you describe does indeed seem to be what I
am seeing.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:42 AM Ravi Gaur wrote:
> We have seen this while z13 migration to z14 specially with the cable swa=
> ps for OSA ICC weren't showing active with SE and eventually with the POR=
> (act
Not necessarily.
If your JOBDEF is defined with CNVT_SCHENV=HONOR, convertion phase will be done
at desired Lpar.
Can be changed by $TJOBDEF, CNVT_SCHENV=HONOR or CNVT_SCHENV=IGNORE
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
BANCO BRADESCO S.A.
4250 / DITI Engenharia de Sof
Looks like that got added in 2.1, we've been using SCHENV much longer than
that, but good to know, thank you.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 9:42 AM ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO <
ituriel.nascime...@bradesco.com.br> wrote:
> Not necessarily.
> If your JOBDEF is defined with CNVT_SCHENV=HONOR, convertion p
Many, many thanks to all of you for your comments. I've made a long list of
quotes pulled from your emails and plan to go over them with the sysprog in
tomorrow's meeting. Then she goes away on vacation for a month, so I'll have
lots of time to think, reread, ask more questions and peruse the
As I posted about several months ago, do not try to use the Workflow
'Customization for z/OSMF Plugins' as it has the annoying habit of
translating your entire IZUPRMxx members to UPPER CASE!My PMR is still
open, they have recreated this phenomenon in the lab, but they are still hard
Hi,
So I know I am missing something here as my predecessors did things uniquely.
So here my dilemma...
I generated a new ISPCFIGU module and put it into my linklst, did the refresh,
etc and its not being picked up.
If I add the ISPCFIGU to my ISPLLIB, it works just fine. And execute ISPCCO
What library are you loading it to? Out of that utility, I tell it to make a
usermod, which I then apply, and the load module ends up in SISPLOAD.
_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
18
Thank everyone who helped.
The trick was that IZUPRMxx was NOT READ during startup.
I had IZUPRM='PREV', but no IZU= entry in IEASYS.
In effect IZUPRM00 member existed, I added PLUGINS entry, but it was not
read during IZUSVR1 startup.
I fixed it. Now the icons are not gray, but I lack some RACF
===>isrddn m ispcconf
and ispcfigu
Have to look at the SEL panel and see what it is invoking and where it is
invoking it from.
===>panelid on
In a message dated 1/31/2019 12:24:13 PM Central Standard Time,
01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu writes:
What library are you loading it to?
Issuing DYNDISP THIN command on a CF with no shared CF engines gets
CF0505I DYNDISP command cancelled
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Origi
Does sound like it could be a secondary extent in the link list lib
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 1:18 PM Shaffer, Terri <
017d5f778222-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
> So I know I am missing something here as my predecessors did things
> uniquely. So here my dilemma...
>
> I genera
Hello,
If I need to make a change to my BPXPRM00 parmlib member can I get the change
in while everything is running or does it have to done via an IPL?
Thanks,
Ron McCabe
Manager of Mainframe/Midrange Systems
Mutual of Enumclaw
Confidentiality Notice: This e- mail and all attachments may conta
I know power systems has one. Dies system z has such product?
ITschak
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Ive verified the linklist dataset is where I generated the module, Ive done
multiple ISRFIND and ISRDDN just to make sure my concatenations are what I
expected.
,BROWSE ,SYS2.USERMOD.LINKLIB(ISPCFIGU)
,Command ===>,
* Top of
.Ø..ISPCFIGU...o
س..
W dniu 2019-01-31 o 19:18, Shaffer, Terri pisze:
Hi,
So I know I am missing something here as my predecessors did things
uniquely. So here my dilemma...
I generated a new ISPCFIGU module and put it into my linklst, did the refresh,
etc and its not being picked up.
If I add the ISPCFIGU to
We share CFs between Sandbox and Dev. The latter is not classified here as
Prod, though its usage is a lot more prod-ish than is Sandbox. We currently set
all the shared-CP LPARs to THIN based on some Q&A in a SHARE session. Should we
revisit that question?
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern Califo
For most everything you should be able to update it and then do T OMVS=00. I
believe there are a couple of limitations.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of McCabe, Ron
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 1:43 PM
To: IBM-
I hate to ask, but you did do a F LLA,REFRESH, right?
_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717
-Original M
Yes multiple times
Ms Terri E Shaffer
Senior Systems Engineer,
z/OS Support:
ACIWorldwide – Telecommuter
H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent
I've got CSVDYLPA code that has been working more or less unchanged for
eight years -- no idea what release of z/OS it was developed on. (The coding
has not changed but it is re-assembled from time to time -- the most recent
object module was created on V2R2.)
All of a sudden I am getting return c
I would do a D OMVS and see if 00 is the only thing used.
Some shops have multiple BPXPRM members and concatenate them together.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Burrell, Todd
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 11:46 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@
Ron, Many individual parms can be set via the SETOMVS console command, and may
be more along the lines of what you want. Depending on if you have your
MOUNT statements split out from other statements (BPXPRMFS vs BPXPRM00), doing
a SET OMVS=xx might do more than you anticipate or want.
It w
Well, we can rule out the need for an XC -- I see that that is what the MF=E
macro starts out with, an LA 1 of the area followed by XC 0(116,1),0(1).
So, what could cause an 080E?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
Afaik, The standard plugins delivered with z/OSMF need to be started with the
associated plugin statement in IZUPRMxx. I don't think you can even install
them with the Import Manager.
Now, there are optional plugin's like the CDP Configuration Tool and SDSF that
can be installed with the Import
On 1/31/2019 1:54 PM, Shaffer, Terri wrote:
Yes multiple times
Ms Terri E Shaffer
Senior Systems Engineer,
z/OS Support:
ACIWorldwide – Telecommuter
H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
Terri,
You're likely not seeing the settings because you're not starting with a
I would form a view as to how important CF request performance is for Dev.
If it's important I'd be tempted to turn DYNDISP off for Dev and let
Sandbox suffer.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...
Thank you for all the feedback. Even though we are all virtual tape, I am
under the impression that not all the data residing on tape should be. Yes
it's virtual and therefore disk, but many of the JCL used today is old and
since there is no chargeback for tape, users continue to write their d
Sorry about the delayed response but I was out for a very important
appointment. Anyway this is the first couple of lines from the D OMVS,O
command and based on what I am seeing I must be using 00, CI, and FS. I'm
going to do a test in my RESCUE system to see what it does.
D OMVS,O
BPXO043I 1
An odd thing happened when I was looking at an application that
was burning CPU. Because they had gone to LBI (Large Block
Interface) and because we were using a VTS (don't know which
one), reads and buffer xfer were faster to C-Store (memory) than
DASD was!! Since they were also doing READ REA
David,
I do have my mount statements split out from other statements. I must be doing
something wrong because when I enter "SETOMVS,MAXUIDS=2000" as a command from
the z/OS console I get an error that the command is invalid. I tried to issue
from within OMVS and I also get an error "FSUM7351
Hi Tom,
Thanks, your session was the first thing I read after it didn’t work for me.
But I must be missing something.. I deleted my ISPF.PROF and loaded default
from SYS1.SISP* libraries.
But I still see the same entries in my variables:
ZCFGCMPD,S,N,2014/11/20
ZCFGCMPT,S,N,15:13
ZCFGKSRC,S
SETOMVS MAXUIDS=2000
No comma after SETOMVS!!!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of McCabe, Ron
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 5:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: BPXPRM00 parmlib
[[ SEI WA
Thank you that worked.
Thanks,
Ron McCabe
Manager of Mainframe/Midrange Systems
Mutual of Enumclaw
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Cieri, Anthony
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 2:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: BPXPRM00 parmlib
SET
Is there another ISPCFIGU that is ahead of linklist in the search order?
STEPLIB?
Does ISPLLIB count as a task lib, which would be ahead of STEPLIB?
If you issue M ISPCFIGU from ISRDDN, where is it found?
--
Tom Marchant
--
Fo
And the answer is:
1. Don't code PLISTVER=MAX on the MF=E. Code it on the MF=L, but code or
allow it to default to IMPLIED_VERSION on the MF=E.
2. New environment, and I was confused: I was building on V2R3 and
attempting to run on V2R2. The format of the CSVDYLPA parameter list has
changed betwe
I have to say, I've never seen this before so.
BROWSE ,ISPCFIGU&CSA&Start:18772000&Size:0F98 ,Line,0132,Col,001 080
Command ===>,,Scroll ===>,CSR
-10 (18771FF0) * *
+0 (187720
As a general rule for LIST/EXECUTE form macros, avoid coding anything else on
the execute call except for E. The reason is that the LIST call determines what
data needs to be included in the generated code. Once that is built, any parm
that would require a different size or list format will no l
If it's not in LPA list then something is loading it. Could be a command in
PARMlib or a startup command in tuning software.
In a message dated 1/31/2019 5:51:59 PM Central Standard Time,
017d5f778222-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu writes:
I am not sure if CSA means common, or how it got loa
Do others here agree with that advice? Eschew MF=(E,...,COMPLETE) ?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 4:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Cause of
Don't know, maybe some do. I would advise following the book, examining
the code, and maybe experimenting to get the results that seem to work the
best (fsvo best).
Your issue came up from assembling on a higher level than you executed on.
Gotta be careful with that. I do think IBM might have pr
>I know power systems has one. Dies system z has such product?
The Hardware Management Console is available in traditional desktop and 1U
rack mounted form factors. The latter form factor can be installed within
the optional "16U Reserved" feature on IBM z14 ZR1 and IBM LinuxONE
Rockhopper II mode
On 2019-02-01 11:59 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
Do others here agree with that advice? Eschew MF=(E,...,COMPLETE) ?
Numerous newer (in geological terms) macros simply define a storage area
with MF=L. For these I use PLISTVER=MAX with MF=L when it's available,
and in these cases I also use COMPLE
Hello,
How can I get reports that are in the Output Queue in SDSF to be
re-printed...basically I want them to be processed again.
Thanks,
Ron McCabe
Manager of Mainframe/Midrange Systems
Mutual of Enumclaw
Confidentiality Notice: This e- mail and all attachments may contain
CONFIDENTIAL infor
Double check the Catalog lists and the DSN / VOLSER between the
problem LPAR and the working LPAR. I suspect it might be a
development LPAR with different DSNs. Maybe check with IPLINFO too?
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:45 PM Shaffer, Terri
<017d5f778222-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
So, the "problem" you try to solve is that you want to charge more data? Why
don't you just start charging tape data then?
I think you a trying to build a canon just to shoot a mosquito (Dutch
expression).
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAI
60 matches
Mail list logo
