Out of curiosity, I ran this as interpreted REXX and then as compiled
REXX.
The REXX compiler does not like SYSVAR so I just ran them both as batch
jobs and looked at the IEF032I message in JES SYSTEM MESSAGES:
Interpreted (Non-compiled )
IEF032I STEP/STEP010 /STOP
2018255.1024
CPU:
ITschak Mugzach wrote:
>Strange indeed. However, my rexx is a collection of many procedure calls
>(internal). Should this effect the way SYSVAR works?
I don't know about the SYSVAR.
I am using this alternative (elapsd time) to see how fast my Catalog Search
Interface is working:
SAY TIME('E'
On 12/09/2018 3:42 PM, Mike Shorkend wrote:
Out of curiosity, I ran this as interpreted REXX and then as compiled
REXX.
The REXX compiler does not like SYSVAR
That's curious! SYSVAR works fine for me with the REXX compiler.
I have found that the compiled REXX runtime memory management is flaw
David Crayford wrote:
>Try the following snippet both interpreted and compiled.
>/* REXX */
>start = sysvar('SYSCPU')
>s = copies('0',1024)
>do i = 1 to 50
> a.i = s
>end
>say 'CPU time = 'sysvar('SYSCPU') - start
Thanks! That is a nice cool one. I have put that also in my REXX progs for R
My $0.02:
PTF arrived approx. half year after the problem was detected.
So,
a) everyone who did not shut down their z/OS for half year was highly
insecure, risky, vulnerable
b) it's no big deal to not apply the fix (with proper MCLs and OSPROTECT
setting)
What is a difference between running s
It look like the problem is not in my code, but somehow in my system. I am
running z/os 2.3 on a zPDT box. I'll investigate this issue.
ITschak
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 11:37 AM Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:
> David Crayford wrote:
>
> >Try the following snippet bo
OK. found it. it work fine under tso/batch, but doesn't work under
systemrexx.
ITschak
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 11:46 AM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> It look like the problem is not in my code, but somehow in my system. I am
> running z/os 2.3 on a zPDT box. I'll investigate this issue.
>
> ITschak
Got SYSVAR to work with Compiled rexx
The original test not-compiled
BGN CPU: 39.17
BGN SRV: 49548
END CPU: 52.11
END SRV: 69953
and Compiled
BGN CPU: 38.86
BGN SRV: 49069
END CPU: 39.12
END SRV: 49477
Same results as my other test - about 50 times faster with compi
On 12/09/2018 4:56 PM, Mike Shorkend wrote:
The new test shows:
Non-compiled
CPU TIME = 77.09
Compiled
CPU TIME = 11.27
Your results are different to mine!
Interpreted: CPU time = 3.12
Compiled: CPU time = 7.99
Not so great, because of the inefficient memory management with stem
usa
David - I ran it on z/OS 2.2, the REXX compiler is 1.4
How about you?
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 12:27, David Crayford wrote:
> On 12/09/2018 4:56 PM, Mike Shorkend wrote:
> > The new test shows:
> > Non-compiled
> >
> > CPU TIME = 77.09
> >
> > Compiled
> >
> > CPU TIME = 11.27
>
> Your results are
W dniu 2018-09-10 o 23:20, R.S. pisze:
1. IOCP.txt import.
Until HMC 2.13.n thre was a choice of source: USB stick in HMC or
*directly* to SE, which mean one has to establish some connectivity to
internal (HMC-SE) network.
I vaguely remember there was announcement the connectivity to change
i
z/OS 2.3, IBM Compiler for REXX on zSeries 4.0 LVL PI76785.
Can you share you compiler JCL?
On 12/09/2018 5:32 PM, Mike Shorkend wrote:
David - I ran it on z/OS 2.2, the REXX compiler is 1.4
How about you?
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 12:27, David Crayford wrote:
On 12/09/2018 4:56 PM, Mike Sho
Regarding the IOCP.txt import.
Prior to 2.14.0, your choices were USB or FTP to/from the SE itself. Starting
with 2.14.0, the SE will not directly connect to an FTP server but instead will
route thru an HMC.
The changes to route FTP (and SFTP and FTPS) thru an HMC apply to all SE-based
op
I use the procedure provided by IBM, taking all compiler option defaults
// JCLLIB ORDER='FAN140.SVSC.PROCLIB'
//S1 EXEC REXXC
//SYSCEXEC DD DSN=MIKE.CREXX(LOOP2),DISP=SHR
//SYSINDD DSN=MIKE.REXX(LOOP2),DISP=SHR
which expands to
XX*---
Boys, don't still the thread... I need to understand why is same code not
working under SystemRexx. Try it yourself.
ITschak
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:56 PM Mike Shorkend
wrote:
> I use the procedure provided by IBM, taking all compiler option defaults
>
> // JCLLIB ORDER='FAN140.SVSC.PROCLI
This is totally bizarre! I'm getting different results running in TSO
foreground and IKJEFT01 batch running the same compiled REXX program.
TSO
CPU time = 2.19
Batch
CPU time = 0.05
CPU (Total) Elapsed CPU
(TCB) CPU (SRB) Service
Jobname Step
On 12/09/2018 6:07 PM, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
Boys, don't still the thread... I need to understand why is same code not
working under SystemRexx. Try it yourself.
I would take a guess that if you are running System REXX with TSO=YES
then sysvar('SYSCPU') is returning the CPU time of
the paren
Sounds like a bug to ne...
ITschak
בתאריך יום ד׳, 12 בספט׳ 2018, 13:40, מאת David Crayford <
dcrayf...@gmail.com>:
> On 12/09/2018 6:07 PM, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> > Boys, don't still the thread... I need to understand why is same code not
> > working under SystemRexx. Try it yourself.
>
> I w
On 12/09/2018 7:01 PM, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
Sounds like a bug to ne...
Maybe in System REXX but not in TSO where you may have split screens and
multiple tasks in the mix. Open an RFE.
ITschak
בתאריך יום ד׳, 12 בספט׳ 2018, 13:40, מאת David Crayford <
dcrayf...@gmail.com>:
On 12/09/2018
Will do. the partner site is under maintenance...
ITscha
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:11 PM David Crayford wrote:
> On 12/09/2018 7:01 PM, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> > Sounds like a bug to ne...
>
> Maybe in System REXX but not in TSO where you may have split screens and
> multiple tasks in the mix.
Hello dear colleagues,
For unknown reasons I have a volume with the following content in the vtoc:
Command - Enter "/" to select action Dsorg Recfm Lrecl Blksz
--
-
** SYSUT1.T0849100 PS U 0
backing out means regressing z/OS maint, and IPLing vs just changing
the OSPROTECT setting, and IPLinga huge difference.
You mean IPLing from the previous IPL volume?
Why is that such a big deal?
We do a consolidated maintenance cycle two times per year, both IBM
software, and ISV. We on
The biggest issue/roadblock in my recent shops has been that non-mainframe
managers and above still think the mainframe is dying. I’ve found that having
non-mainframe managers really prevents the mainframe and the staff from making
progress on initiatives like AI and others. At my last shop, we
Have you tried ISMF, Option 1, list the uncataloged datasets and issue
DELETEs
Richard Marchant
Edcon Stores Ltd
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 1:51 PM Hilario Garcia wrote:
> Hello dear colleagues,
>
> For unknown reasons I have a volume with the following content in the vtoc:
>
> Command - Enter "/"
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 06:51:01 -0500, Hilario Garcia wrote:
>
>For unknown reasons I have a volume with the following content in the vtoc:
>
>Command - Enter "/" to select action Dsorg Recfm Lrecl Blksz
>--
>---
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:18 AM Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> The biggest issue/roadblock in my recent shops has been that non-mainframe
> managers and above still think the mainframe is dying. I’ve found that
> having non-mainframe managers really prevent
Same issues we had as well. 100% agree.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, September 12, 2018, 9:08 AM, John McKown
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:18 AM Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> The biggest issue/roadblock in my recent shops has be
Are you sure you are running compiled in both instances? Compiled Rexx will
silently fall back to interpreted if the right library is not allocated.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of David Crayford
Sent: Wednes
W dniu 2018-09-12 o 11:50, Tom Mathias pisze:
Regarding the IOCP.txt import.
Prior to 2.14.0, your choices were USB or FTP to/from the SE itself. Starting
with 2.14.0, the SE will not directly connect to an FTP server but instead will
route thru an HMC.
The changes to route FTP (and SFTP and
W dniu 2018-09-12 o 14:50, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 06:51:01 -0500, Hilario Garcia wrote:
For unknown reasons I have a volume with the following content in the vtoc:
Command - Enter "/" to select action Dsorg Recfm Lrecl Blksz
--
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Hilario Garcia
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 4:51 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: How to delete strange files on dasd
>
> Hello dear colleagues,
>
> For unknown reasons I have a volume with the
W dniu 2018-09-11 o 10:39, Peter pisze:
Thanks Tom and Parwez,
So the COD are built in IBM labs specifically for a scratch built ?
Wondering how IBM prepares those CODs ? Any ibmer would like to share ?
It is just z/OS, nothing magic.
Relatively simplified, small pre-defined installation on 3
With the HMC 2.14 level, all FTP (and FTPS/SFTP) operations that originate in
the SE really proxy thru an HMC. The HMC must have the SE defined into it and
it. This means that uou need to make sure that at least one HMC can get to the
FTP server that the SE wants to access. These are the only
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:47:00 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>>> --
>>> -
>>> ** SYSUT1.T0849100 PS U 0 666
>>> ...
>> It's shortsighted design that many utilities don't suport deleting "strange
Hello,
Question from our developers...is there an easy way to search for a string in
all COBOL programs except for 1 or 2? So what they would like to do is search
for a string in all but 1 or 2 of the COBOL programs in a PDS and they don't
want to have to "select" the programs from the list si
Copy all but those 1 or 2 programs to a temp PDS and scan that?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of McCabe, Ron
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 2:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Search for utility
**CAUTION
S *
Then L exception and remove the S
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Jousma, David
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 12:09 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Search for utility
>
> Copy all but
I think some version of this will do it.. update NEWDD with the PDS/PDSE,
use EXCLUDE for 1 or 2 and run SRCHFOR.
http://mainframe-tips-and-tricks.blogspot.com/2011/12/superc-how-to-exclude-commented-lines.html
Rob Schramm
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:11 PM Gibney, Dave wrote:
> S *
>
> Then L
Can they not just ignore the 1 or 2 programs when they review the output?
Tony Thigpen
McCabe, Ron wrote on 09/12/2018 02:52 PM:
Hello,
Question from our developers...is there an easy way to search for a string in all COBOL
programs except for 1 or 2? So what they would like to do is search
The OP posted part of screen shot from something, so the dataset names are
perfectly normal, and "follow the rules". They won't require quoting.
Chances are, entering the '/' as prompted would provide an option to
delete. Regardless, absent any other information, I don't know why any
method would
Ron,
There is no easier option to exclude members from the SRCHFOR list. If you
are interested, here is a Batch version which will give you the desired
results
// EXPORT SYMLIST=(MEM1,MEM2,SRCHSTR)
// SET MEM1=exclpgm1/* EXCLUDE MEMBER1 */
// SET MEM2=exclpgm2
How about a combination of ISPF Edit macro programs.
Start with EDMACALL from Mark's MVS Utilities: http://mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
EDMACALL: This is a REXX exec that can be used to run an edit macro against all
members of a PDS.
You would need to modify this exec to exclude the members that you d
Thanks Kolusu...I will pass this on to my developers and let them try it out.
Thanks,
Ron McCabe
Mutual of Enumclaw
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sri
h Kolusu
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 1:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sear
This advice applies to StarTool. I'm not sure it works for the shareware
version on CBT, but I believe it will.
The product is designed to work on member lists. There are many ways to create
a member list by pattern, but a simple method is to start with all members and
then X(clude) those you
They look like temporary data sets created by IEHMOVE.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.idau100/da5u140.htm
Bill
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 06:51:01 -0500, Hilario Garcia wrote:
>Hello dear colleagues,
>
>For unknown reasons I have a volume with the followi
45 matches
Mail list logo
