Sue,thank you for correcting the inexcusable error so quickly.
It was, however, unnecessary to post what may look as reasonable justification
to you. To me "improve customer experience" is always announcing a step back in
service, usability, availability. It's the current management buzzword to
Hello All,
In a 2 port per CHPID card (4 ports in a card), to use OSA/SF, is 1 OSAD unit
required per port (for a total of 4), or is 1 OSAD unit enough per CHPID/PCH
(for a total of 2).
Thanks in advance 😊
– Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
MARKSANDSPENCER.COM
___
It's almost as if Google hasn't crawled the 2.2 and 2.3 Knowledge Center
content, because the material is certainly there but it doesn't appear in the
results - at least not in the first pages presented before, for example, I
start getting license plate results when I'm looking for a message id.
W dniu 2018-06-15 o 11:05, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh pisze:
Hello All,
In a 2 port per CHPID card (4 ports in a card), to use OSA/SF, is 1 OSAD unit
required per port (for a total of 4), or is 1 OSAD unit enough per CHPID/PCH
(for a total of 2).
You need 1 OSAD per CHPID, in other words 1 OS
There is a technology, which is very old, named URL rewrite.
It basically allows to receive a http request for:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieaa700/GETMAIN_Execute_form.htm
and process it as:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:27:47 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
>Even if you have a z/OS 2.1 manual, some PTFs do add features or
>command or document changes to older versions, and they only update
>the newest manual. Sometimes it is best to get the newer manual then
>check the document changes so you a
Thanks Radoslaw, that's all I needed to know (to fill this gap in my
understanding of OSD setup).
– Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: 15 June 2018 12:24
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.
OSA/SF doesn't work with the newer OSA and mainframe hardware. Can't remember
if it stopped with OSA-E4 or OSA-E5.
These functions moved from OSA/SF to the hardware console instead.
Around the same time the z/OS D TCPIP,,OSAINFO command was introduced to
replace (most of) the OSA/SF display fun
Is IBM trying to reduce the usefulness of the KC?
I just searched for the z14 HMC doc with Google and the top link resulted in
this message. Seems the content in the KC is being reduced. Is IBM trying to
reduce their DASD footprint. Is AWS charging too much for it :)
Documentation for z14, HMC
W dniu 2018-06-15 o 15:33, Mike Wawiorko pisze:
OSA/SF doesn't work with the newer OSA and mainframe hardware. Can't remember
if it stopped with OSA-E4 or OSA-E5.
These functions moved from OSA/SF to the hardware console instead.
Around the same time the z/OS D TCPIP,,OSAINFO command was intro
Isn't there provision for anchors in the current version of PDF?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jerry Callen
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 8:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sub
Could IBM have put a noindex in there?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Ambros, Thomas <010f77c934b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 6:54 AM
To: IBM-
IMHO, IBM should be very cautious about using noindex and robots.txt; there are
legitimate reasons to search for old manuals.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Kirk Wolf
Sent: Thu
Hello, I am having some difficulty in troubleshooting an application
problem dealing with a started task, and want to create a dump of the
application job and the STC at a particular point of time.
Can someone tell me if I can set a SLIP to create an SVCD when my job
encounters a message that is p
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ieag100/slipxmp.htm
You can check out the MSGID parameter, but it appears to only work in response
to a command, vs trap on a random message. Probably better off using your
automation package to do that, and have it d
Sorry, I should have read closer. You would need automation to trap on message
ID, parse the text, and take whatever actions you wanted.
_
Dave Jousma
Manager Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830
16 matches
Mail list logo
