I had to give access to partition for the chipid before defining and that
sorted the problem...Thanks Ken Mazer.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the m
The author of this article should work on some others, such as:
"Are Humans a Security Risk?"
"Are Paper records a Security Risk?"
"Are Customers a Security Risk?"
"Mitigating risk by eliminating telephones in the corporate environment"
--
I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything,
Problem #1.
I want to change some data in a dataset (non-PO) using AMASPZAP.
My SYSIN:
CCHHR 0555000A01
VER 01F6 080006,400050,01E00016
REP 01F6 080007,400050,01E00026
ABSDUMPT ALL
The problem is CCHHR. Sometimes I know exactly what I want to change
(simply: know VER
http://cbttape.org/cbtfaq.htm
Q. What does CBT stand for?
A. This tape was established and previously edited for over 15 years, from
Version 1 through Version 321 by Arnold Casinghino who worked at Connecticut
Bank and Trust Company (CBT).
-Original Message-
Excuse me, what CBT stands
I don't know what you mean by "current one", as I have V2R3 manual
(SC23-6852-30), and it has no such inconsistency in Appendix E, Table
71, on page 428.
sas
2018-01-17 19:08 GMT-05:00 R.S. :
> I just read some chapter of DFSMS Macro Instructions for Datasets, the
> current one.
> And I found the
unsubscribe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Anthony Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 8:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Finding the names of hsm's BCDSs
Similarly, I was going to suggest callin
I would suggest that AMASPZAP is the wrong tool for this. It requires knowing
the offset.
Why not simply an edit session with a hex change command? As you are doing a
PS dataset anyway, no big deal. Or a simple program?
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:44:54 +0100 "R.S."
wrote:
:>Problem #1.
:>I want to
On Jan 17, 2018, at 11:06 PM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
>
> One of the issues of ACM SIGPLAN Notices definitively resolved this
> issue by suggesting that the any need for the harmful semantics of GOTO
> statement could easily be eliminated by instead allowing a "COME FROM"
> statement. I can't remem
Thank you ITschak!
I will try posting on the zPDT list to see if anyone there with later
maintenance has the problem, or whether it is just a GA V2R2 issue
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:29 AM, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> Same abens on our v2.2 (zP
OK, the manual is little bit out of date. ;-)
It is SC26-7408-10, a book from z/OS 1.13 Collection. However IMHO
nothing has changed in that area during last 10-20 years.
I checked in z/OS 2.2 - it is fixed.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2018-01-18 o 14:55, Steve Smith pisze:
It is not necessarily PS dataset, it can be some component of VSAM.
Actually I'm using SPZAP to inject some "illegal values" inside.
And I'd like to make it automatically. Batch is automatic, online is
manual. ;-)
Of course I know the offset and old data. What I cannot predict is disk
address
And even made it to 99 bottles of beer.
http://www.99-bottles-of-beer.net/language-intercal-333.html
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Pew, Curtis G
wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2018, at 11:06 PM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
>>
>> One of the issues of ACM SIGPLAN Notices definitively resolved this
>> issue by su
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:53:35 +0100 "R.S."
wrote:
:>It is not necessarily PS dataset, it can be some component of VSAM.
:>Actually I'm using SPZAP to inject some "illegal values" inside.
:>And I'd like to make it automatically. Batch is automatic, online is
:>manual. ;-)
Edit can be done batch.
I'm trying to search IBM-Main's archive but am getting only matches from 2007
and elder. Even searching for words I can see in current threads do not show up.
Is anyone else having the same problem this?
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:30:02 +0100, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>I'm trying to search IBM-Main's archive but am getting only matches from 2007
>and elder. Even searching for words I can see in current threads do not show
>up.
>
>Is anyone else having the same problem this?
First, just to be clear si
>So, since you're finding information from 2007, I'll assume you're in the
>right archive, (a).
Yep, I've verified this.
>How are you searching? Via the web, e.g., from the Search box or Search link
>on the right-hand navigation here:
>https://listserv.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind1801&L=IBM-MAIN
>Of course I know the offset and old data. What I cannot predict is disk
address and in fact cannot understand why AMASPZAP wants me to provide
unnecessary information.
I think you may misunderstand the parameters. The offset on the VER and REP
statements is the byte offset from the beginning of
The use of goto is a religious issue and will never be settled by mere facts.
For those seriously interested, Knuth's "Structured Programming With GOTO" is a
must read.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discuss
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:51:40 +0100, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>>So, since you're finding information from 2007, I'll assume you're in the
>>right archive, (a).
>
>
>Yep, I've verified this.
>
>
>>How are you searching? Via the web, e.g., from the Search box or Search link
>>on the right-hand navigat
>How many hits does it say that there are for your search?
Well, that is part of the mystery. I was searching for words that must appear
in post, such as "storage", and I got "No Matches".
In the meantime, I tried a search via mail as show below. Instant reply with a
long list of hits, with
W dniu 2018-01-18 o 18:57, Peter Hunkeler pisze:
Of course I know the offset and old data. What I cannot predict is disk
address and in fact cannot understand why AMASPZAP wants me to provide
unnecessary information.
I think you may misunderstand the parameters. The offset on the VER and REP
Did you check both archives? There is a current on and older one.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 8:30 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Only v
Of course there are other tools, some of them provide batch interface,
but I wanted SPZAP because it is not licensed, that means available with
any z/OS installation.
Suppose you could copy the record to a temporary data set, modify it,
and rewrite it?
There are different unload and rewri
On 18 January 2018 at 09:53, R.S. wrote:
> It is not necessarily PS dataset, it can be some component of VSAM. Actually
> I'm using SPZAP to inject some "illegal values" inside.
> And I'd like to make it automatically. Batch is automatic, online is manual.
I'm a little surprised that SPZAP is wil
I seem to have this recollection that there were two ways to write SMF 89
records (not counting SMFEWTM): the IFAUSAGE macro and something that I
recall as more of an HLL-callable type routine. Am I correct, or am I
confused?
Am I perhaps thinking of IFAEDREG? Does it write an SMF 89? Or just che
>Did you check both archives? There is a current on and older one.
No, I tried searching IBM-MAIN because I knew the post I'm looking for is not
older than two years.
Anyway, as said in a previous post, I'll be using the "command line interface",
i.e. searching via mail sinc it has much better
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>I'm trying to search IBM-Main's archive but am getting only matches from 2007
>and elder. Even searching for words I can see in current threads do not show
>up.
This is WAD. You are probably not using the search tool properly.
>Is anyone else having the same problem this
27 matches
Mail list logo
