OS/390 2.5

2017-11-26 Thread Mark Wilson
Hi Folks, I have a client who is running OS/390 2.5 and they cannot upgrade their OS for many reasons, let’s just not go there! They have asked what is the latest z Hardware they can use whilst running OS/390 2.5, but I am struggling to find any info out there at the moment. I know its old, un

Re: OS/390 2.5

2017-11-26 Thread ITschak Mugzach
Any hardware if running under z/vm. Some model issues may raised (like reports more mips that actual). ITschak On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Mark Wilson wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I have a client who is running OS/390 2.5 and they cannot upgrade their OS > for many reasons, let’s just not go the

Re: OS/390 2.5

2017-11-26 Thread Wolfgang Fritz
This should not be the only solution. Check a product/company it is called lzlabs. You can run all your software on x86. https://www.lzlabs.com/ > Am 26.11.2017 um 13:57 schrieb ITschak Mugzach : > > Any hardware if running under z/vm. Some model issues may raised (like > reports more mips that

Re: DB2 & CICS Training

2017-11-26 Thread David Staudacher
Venkat: Besides the IBM courses Timothy mentioned, there are also several good providers listed here: http://linkd.in/2arLJqM - Mainframe Education ... Circle, Themis and Interskill are all very good. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /

SCDS SYS1.SCDS IS AN INVALID

2017-11-26 Thread johnnydeep san
Hello all, I did "SCDS BASE ALTER" for adding a new system, getting below error while trying to activating CDS. Please guide me "IGD049I ACTIVATE FAILED - SCDS SYS1.SCDS IS AN INVALID CONFIGURATION " . ++JD++ -- For IBM-

Re: SCDS SYS1.SCDS IS AN INVALID

2017-11-26 Thread Doug Shupe
Did you validate the SCDS first? How many systems are in the SYSPLEX? On Nov 26, 2017, at 11:37, johnnydeep san wrote: Hello all, I did "SCDS BASE ALTER" for adding a new system, getting below error while trying to activating CDS. Please guide me "IGD049I ACTIVATE FAILED - SCDS SYS1.SCDS IS A

Re: SCDS SYS1.SCDS IS AN INVALID

2017-11-26 Thread Lizette Koehler
First step is to look up the message and see if it helps What steps did you take to add the new system to SMS? Did you do a validate after doing your steps? When was the last time you successfully added a system to the SMS configuration? Do you have a checklist of what steps to take when addin

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
Thanks Bill... I do try to keep up with email even when far away from my desk. And this was a fun thread to read just now. I have not read ibm-main for a while because my wife made me go on vacation to Spain. I think I could live in Barcelona - beautiful city. Bill Wilkie wrote: I haven't

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
Yes, even though I don't do a lot of systems work these days, I still do logon to something every day. And since I never learned to touch-type, my backspace and delete keys are probably the most used :) Ed Jaffe wrote: On 11/21/2017 7:43 PM, Charles Mills wrote: Tom Brennan Vista? We use

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
Thanks Skip (Vista user #1) - I remember that day. But you may not know that months prior my programming goal was to "Add enough functionality that Skip would accept it". So that day was the acid test. Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: I eat the same cooking. Have not used any other emulator since Tom

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
Hi Andy... At first I thought "why bother" because people expect Linux software for free, but a bigger issue is that I had never used a Linux GUI. Just recently I've been working with SUSE and whatever the default install GUI is, and it's pretty good - enough like Windows that it's easy for m

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
Thanks Dave. I hope I can live up to that. David Cole wrote: I simply don't understand why anyone would still be putting up with PCOMM. Tom Brennan Vista remains both well and fully supported. It is, was, and will always be the best. Dave Cole ColeSoft Marketing 414 Third Street, NE Charlotte

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
Wow... that's interesting, but seems to add complexity I would have certainly avoided. I guess these days people assume servers are running and connections are available. David Crayford wrote: It's not zero footprint at all. It requires a back-end application server! A pure ZERO footprint 327

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
I thought about it early on, but a user would expect that the HLAPPI program they wrote for PCOMM would work with Vista without any modifications, and even without a recompile. Multiply that work by the number of other existing emulator products, and I saw it as a full-time job for about 5 peo

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
In almost 20 years of Vista TN3270 support, I think I've had about 5 people asking for graphics, and most were for "fun" (to play chess, display JPG images, etc.) I don't think I ever had anyone ask me for something business oriented, such as a SAS graph. My thoughts are that virtually all gr

Re: DB2 & CICS Training

2017-11-26 Thread Suresh Chacko
Dear Venkat You can find CICS and Db2 courses at Marist IDCP, Poughkeepsie, NY, U.S. You may contact Mr. Angelo Corridori in angelo.corrid...@marist.edu. Best regards Suresh Chacko Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 26, 2017, at 17:58, David Staudacher wrote: > > Venkat: Besides the IBM courses T

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
Hi Robert, you're right... and many of those errors were because I wrote Vista initially for Windows 3.1, without using some of the built-in functions for dialog windows. I used more of my own code because I wanted things to look more like Win 95 while still running 3.1. That was fine at the

Re: OS/390 2.5

2017-11-26 Thread ITschak Mugzach
ure Fritz ;-) Mark, if your client goes the VM way, he need to be careful, the machine might report wrong capacity and they will have to agree on capacity with IBM and other vendors. I have a client that runs this way, and had lot of issues with vendors and IBM. ITschak On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
The reason that Vista is so good is that I was actually user #2. Tom was #1. Surely the only emulator written from scratch by an experienced--professional--mainframe programmer. I did ask for a few additional features early on, but most of what I needed was already there, recognized--and provid

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
You guys picked an interesting time to visit Barcelona. Sounds like you had a great time... . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com -Original Message

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
Well, it was planned well in advance of the breakaway activities. But if anyone here is thinking of going soon, we had no issues at all. There were Catalonia flags hanging from balconies, a few flags of Spain in opposition, and that's about it. But people do have strong opinions if asked: for

Re: OS/390 2.5

2017-11-26 Thread Rob Schramm
OS/390 is still 31-bit only. I know zOS 1.4 will run on a mono-processor z13. Definitely going to have issues with processor reporting for products. No ideas past there. In for a difficult ride for sure. Rob On Sun, Nov 26, 2017, 12:59 PM ITschak Mugzach wrote: > ure Fritz ;-) > > Mark, if

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Seymour J Metz
What is "GDDM graphics", APA or PSS? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom Brennan Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2017 12:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: Shocking Bug i

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Seymour J Metz
There are many, of which the most common are GNOME and KDE; both GTK+ and QT are based on X11. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom Brennan Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2017 12:18

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 20:06:57 +, Seymour J Metz wrote: >There are many, of which the most common are GNOME and KDE; both GTK+ and QT >are based on X11. > Lots: https://renewablepcs.wordpress.com/about-linux/kde-gnome-or-xfce/ Ubuntu is reportedly trying to veer away from X11. I don't think

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
Thanks, I think the default is GNOME now that you mention the name. Oh, I assumed all GUI's were X11. If GNOME is not, that's a plus for me - X11 applications always seem a hassle to connect (my uneducated opinion). Seymour J Metz wrote: There are many, of which the most common are GNOME and

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
Years ago I was getting help from Greg Price (who seemed to know more about 3270 protocol than anybody on the planet) to implement PSS which I called GDDM graphics. I don't know anything about APA. Let's see if I have the definitions correct: PSS = Programmed Symbol Set, the host creates litt

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Seymour J Metz
GNOME uses GTK+, which uses X11. KDE uses QT, which uses X11. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom Brennan Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2017 3:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Sub

Re: Source of SYSLOAVG value in RMF3

2017-11-26 Thread Roger Lowe
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 01:33:40 +, Graham Harris wrote: >Would anyone happen to know where the "SYSLOAVG" (stands for 'system load >average') value in RMF3 comes from? >I think it is also known as the WEB queue. > >I have ploughed through the data areas manuals, and cant see any obvious >candida

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Andrew Rowley
On 27/11/2017 06:10 AM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: If this morphs into a requirements session, one feature that would be welcome: handling UNIX file names seamlessly. From the get-go Vista could capture an MVS data set name, or a portion of it, with a simple right mouse click. UNIX file names req

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Jack J. Woehr
On 11/26/2017 1:29 PM, Tom Brennan wrote: Thanks, I think the default is GNOME now that you mention the name.  Oh, I assumed all GUI's were X11.  If GNOME is not, that's a plus for me - X11 applications always seem a hassle to connect (my uneducated opinion). They're all *on top of* the X Wi

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
I'll be hornswoggled. ;-) . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread David Crayford
On 27/11/2017 9:52 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: On 11/26/2017 1:29 PM, Tom Brennan wrote: Thanks, I think the default is GNOME now that you mention the name.  Oh, I assumed all GUI's were X11. If GNOME is not, that's a plus for me - X11 applications always seem a hassle to connect (my uneducated o

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
That might work some of the time, but it's just by chance. The function really needs some work and testing and thinking. The thinking is the hardest part, especially after I put a TV near my desk. Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: I'll be hornswoggled. ;-) . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Ed

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Edward Finnell
Back in the sixties when Federal Systems was big, I seem to remember graphics on TI/HP terminals with oscilloscopes as screen via acoustic couplers no less. Later there were graphic accelerators that went thru the 5088. Haven't looked in a while but there was an option in PARMLIB for graphics su

Re: OS/390 2.5

2017-11-26 Thread Timothy Sipples
Mark Wilson wrote: >They have asked what is the latest z Hardware they can use whilst running >OS/390 2.5, but I am struggling to find any info out there at the moment. I'm puzzled why an upgrade is not possible, but, to answer your question directly, none of IBM's z/Architecture machines (z900 an

Re: OS/390 2.5

2017-11-26 Thread Brian Westerman
I have done a lot of these types of conversions, strangely enough, the biggest jump I have ever performed (so far) was just this year at a small local government site that was still running MVS/ESA who moved to zOS 2.2, they were running on a 4381 and migrated to a z13s. The total outage was ab

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Tom Brennan
Ha... max users=6 :) Sounds a bit like my first computer-related job. Around 1979 I asked to be moved across the hall from the manual map drafting department (ink on silk) to the new graphic computers. We had 10 stations running sold by this company: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computervisi

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

2017-11-26 Thread Martin Packer
At UCL in the early 1980’s we had Tektronix graphics terminals that were exactly as you said. Exotic and scarce devices, fun to watch :-) , compared to the character-based terminals we all had access to. (This on GEC 4000 series mainframes.) Martin Packer > On 27 Nov 2017, at 06:11, Tom Brenna