John,
Here are some more suggestions, in no particular order:
1. IBM InfoSphere Classic Federation Server for z/OS provides JDBC, ODBC,
and DRDA access to VSAM data (and other types of data):
https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/infosphere-classic-federation-server
Microsoft Excel understands
Edward Finnell wrote:
>Dave Alcock heard you 17 yrs ago!
>http://planetmvs.com/
I'm familiar with these nice and useful site.
And I see a new photo with a car with the number plate: BR 14 (with a very
cool statement: 'No Statements flagged in this Assembly')
I also like this new quote: 'What
W dniu 2017-08-22 o 16:30, Robert Hansel pisze:
Itschak and Radoslaw,
I believe the permissions for /bin/sh should be 1755, displayed as rwxr-xr-t.
Note the 1 for the attribute, displayed as 't', activates the Sticky Bit. This
causes Unix to execute an MVS program by the name of SH instead of
This is my RFE.
Currently 75 votes supporting it but only uncommitted candidate.
Can we get it to over a hundred votes?
Headline:
Support EZANS as part of z/OS Communications Server
ID:
59073
Mike Wawiorko
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LIST
W dniu 2017-08-22 o 16:33, Phil Smith III pisze:
R.S. wrote:
IMHO it was a mistake from the begining.
Whenever I asked the question: "what is the difference between zBX and
regular 19" rack with blade servers" I heard about Ensemble, OSX, OSM, etc.
Customers do not need ensembles. From custome
He's still maintaining the unofficial IBM-Main FAQ too.
In a message dated 8/23/2017 3:19:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za writes:
I'm familiar with these nice and useful site.
--
For IBM-MA
Thanks! I did not try View port parameters.
Regards, Jim
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Cross posted between RACF-L and IBM-MAIN:
Good day to all,
Before we submit a PMR to IBM, I wish to ask for help on these 2 discussion
lists.
My colleague successfully used WebSphere on LPAR A to access CICS on LPAR B
using HTTP Server using Non-SSL connection.
But when we enable SSL using th
>A little bit of explanations.
I asked the question, because I found discrepancy in the permissions.
Who, how, when, and why changed the permissions - I don't know, that's
another story. However the system seemed to work properly with r-x on
/bin/sh. The problem occured during installation of some
Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
>... WebSphere IBM HTTP Server V5R3M0 on z/OS v1.3 (Yes, I know it is out of
>support.)
Sorry, I mean z/OS v1.13.
I hate typos! 8-[
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Hello,
We are in the process of converting FTP jobs in to SFTP on mainframe
system.
So, we are sending text data from mainframe to AIX system for further
processing.
My observation is, when we use FTP process of transferring the file, by
default we dont get any trailing spaces in file after ftp
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 07:38:59 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
>is familiar with MS VBA. So what he wants to do is to have a VBA
>program which can use the Windows MQSeries dll to communicate with a
>CICS transaction. This transaction would read or write the data on
Maybe have your programmer consider
W dniu 2017-08-23 o 12:52, Peter Hunkeler pisze:
A little bit of explanations.
I asked the question, because I found discrepancy in the permissions.
Who, how, when, and why changed the permissions - I don't know, that's
another story. However the system seemed to work properly with r-x on
/bin/
venkat kulkarni wrote:
>But when we use SFTP process for transferring the file, we get trailing spaces
>added in the file after sftp process completion.
It depends. What SFTP client and server software are you using?
Also, can you show the effective settings during SFTP process?
Groete / Greet
Thanks for reply. I think by default SFTP mode of transfer is binary and
add trailing space at end of every records, which eventually increases the
file of file compare to ftp transfer.
I am using omvs and batch job to transfer file from Mainframe to AIX using
SFTP command .
Are you looking for
BARCLAYS CLASSIFICATION: Internal Only
Hold on a bit.
TCPIP.TCPPARMS(FTPSDATA1) looks suspiciously like an FTP(S) //SYSFTPD or FTP
DATA file.
Please confirm if you are using FTPS (FTP with TLS encryption) or sftp (ftp
within an ssh connection).
These are two entirely unrelated methods of fil
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:09 PM, W Mainframe
<01304632a58d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Guys,Is there any AS400 Hardware Support available for a question?Thank youDan
Try here: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
It's a mailing list. Back a few years ago, we were
venkat kulkarni wrote:
>I think by default SFTP mode of transfer is binary and add trailing space at
>end of every records, which eventually increases the file of file compare to
>ftp transfer.
Not really. It depends on what software you're using and how they are
configured in the first place
You can run a GSKSRVR SSL trace. There was a discussion on this list earlier
about it. And you can go here:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21394697
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrech
We had a similar issue sometime back when upgrading to 2.1, the TLS support
needed was never order, we're were running AT-TLS 2.0 I belive, been a while,
so make sure TLS is installed, as someone already suggest the SSL trace should
show you exactly what your region is needing and what's availab
Jantje & Timothy,
Those look very interesting. But I forgot a critical part in my
initial post. The solution must be FREE of any cost or obligation. The
z/OS system is being "revitalized", but that doesn't mean that we're
going to actually spend any more money on it. Most especially if we
already
I do IBM i as one of my *other* responsibilities. I5 is a little dated (we have
all P7 and P8's) but I'll help if I can. Feel free to PM me as the rest of
this list probably doesn't care about such boxen.
Dana
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:34:27 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 1
we use sftp command for transferring the file.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Mike Wawiorko <
014ab5cdfb21-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> BARCLAYS CLASSIFICATION: Internal Only
>
> Hold on a bit.
>
> TCPIP.TCPPARMS(FTPSDATA1) looks suspiciously like an FTP(S) //SYSFTPD or
> FTP DA
I would appreciate some advice on a problem that I'm having on a
development system.
We copied some volumes from an old machine, where the data sets where SMS
managed to a new system where SMS is really not set up and we would prefer
to keep it that way.
We exported the old usercat that had the da
NTAC:3NS-20
Good question. Reminds me of the age-old Auditor 101 question: "What do
you do to restrict AMASPZAP?"
Explaining that it's just a tool like any other and that the real issue
is properly securing the entities it might update is the real solution
always fell on deaf ears. They believed
Your issue is the new (different) usercat name. I am not sure if the vvds
captures the SMS but I know it captures the usercat.
Mike
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
> I would appreciate some advice on a problem that I'm having on a
> development system.
> We copied some volum
Does ISMF work on your system? I haven't had to use it lately, but ISMF used
to be able to delete uncatalogged SMF datasets and such
Dana
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:24:02 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>
>But the problem is that we can't delete any of the old datasets, since they
>still have the old SMS
This may be a "big hammer" approach, but why not just move the datasets you
want to keep off of each volume to another volume and then initialize each
volume?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Bell
Sent: Wednesda
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:04:13 +0300, venkat kulkarni wrote:
>
>So, we are sending text data from mainframe to AIX system for further
>processing.
>...
>But when we use SFTP process for transferring the file, we get trailing
>spaces added in the file after sftp process completion.
>
I'm astonish
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:04:13 +0300, venkat kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>So, we are sending text data from mainframe to AIX system for further
>>processing.
>>...
>>But when we use SFTP process for
I tried the ISMF panels, and the "DELETE" operator command returns the same
error.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
> Does ISMF work on your system? I haven't had to use it lately, but ISMF
> used to be able to delete
The intrepid "Bit Bucketeers" closing out another great SHARE conference
event in Providence, Rhode Island.
https://youtu.be/uNSKKcxGwk8
https://share.confex.com/data/handout/share/129/Session_20844_handout_10972_0.pdf
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
If you don't have a tool like Trex to either correct the VVDS to BCS entries or
delete the entries you can always try IDCAMS DELETE NVR for non vsam and DELETE
VVR for VSAM (SMS)
//L EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//INVOL0 DD DISP=OLD,UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=xx
//SYSIN DD *
DEL 'HLQ
Thanks for the RFE #
Up to 77 votes!!!
Tony
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Wawiorko
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 4:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SPF Panels for T
Thanks Carmen, that was the tip that I needed.
This combination works:
/* FIRST UNCATALOG, THEN DELETE NON-VSAM VOLUME RECORD */
DELETE LISA.XXX.YYY NOSCRATCH
DELETE LISA.XXX.YYY FILE(VPWRKB) CATALOG(CATALOGV.MASTER) NVR
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
>
---
are
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 10:36 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SMS dataset woes
>
> I tried the ISMF panels, and the "DELETE" operator comma
Excellent! Glad I could help
Carmen
- Original Message -
From: "Kirk Wolf"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 1:23:13 PM
Subject: Re: SMS dataset woes
Thanks Carmen, that was the tip that I needed.
This combination works:
/* FIRST UNCATALOG, THEN D
Sorry about that. It was a trailing thought that got lost.
Never mind
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 11:24 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:52:06 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
>I'd bet that the old FTP transfer had a site default of
>NOTRAILINGBLANKS. This automatically truncates the transferred line
>after the last non-blank character. There is no such option, that I
>know of, for sftp transfers. The "sed" command
Smith III, Phil , HPE Data Security Voltage wrote:
John Eells wrote:
Phil, there are plenty of people left on the RACF team in POK to read whatever
you send in.
Good.
But may I ask what the POSIT was? There could be a relevant APAR or two.
019.
P.S. Lizette, thanks - I meant to post to R
John Eells wrote:
>OK, not related to the problem for which we took the APARs.
>Was the POSIT shared with another class? Weird Things Happen when you do that.
That was my guess, and what led me to suggest they change it. But I don't know.
Still seems like a bug, or at least a doc error, no?
---
On 8/23/2017 7:10 PM, John Eells wrote:
Smith III, Phil , HPE Data Security Voltage wrote:
John Eells wrote:
Phil, there are plenty of people left on the RACF team in POK to read
whatever you send in.
Good.
But may I ask what the POSIT was? There could be a relevant APAR or
two.
019.
P.S
John,
The IBM z/OS Platform for Apache Spark should be available through your
Shopz account at no additional charge. Look for 5655-AAB. Only IBM support
(5655-AAC) is chargeable, and it's optional.
IBM intends to replace the 5655-AAB program number with 5655-OD1 (IBM Open
Data Analytics for z/OS)
>Yet, I wonder why the OP may want trailing blanks on z/OS and not on AIX.
Just guessing here: Its not that they want trailing blanks, they have it
because the data set is RECFM=FB. The FTP truncate option removed them and that
is why they are used to not have trailing blanks after the transfe
>1. The problem with IDz was real and solved by change the permissions.
To me this is not a solution rather a circumvention to the real problem. No
process should recognize the difference in calling, i.e. fork()/exec() or
spawn(), a UNIX binary having or not having the sticky bit set.
If iDZ
Have you checked out the LISTCDT utility -
https://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/racf/downloads/listcdt.html
Haven't run it for sometime but I am sure the report it produces lists off the
POSIT values
Roger
--
For I
46 matches
Mail list logo
