> On Jun 9, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>
> One of my very first oh dark thirty wake up calls. I had tested thoroughly
> using a public test library. All good. Copied the module carefully to the
> production counterpart. Went home. Boom.
>
> The lessons you learn earliest are th
John,
How did your OPS/MVS replacement project go? I am looking at possibly
the same thing.
Tony Thigpen
John McKown wrote on 10/25/2016 07:58 AM:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Steve Horein
wrote:
Thank you for the explanation and reasoning sir!
I supported OPS/MVS in a previous lif
Have you looked at AT-TLS yet? It's a feature within Communications Server
for z/OS.
Timothy Sipples
IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems, AP/GCG/MEA
E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm
>REFRPROT extends this to programs that are not loaded from an
>APF authorized library.
Actually, REFRPROT extends this to programs that are bound with the REFR
option regardless of module authorization or library authorization.
And it goes further because it page-protects, which would cause the
I have used syncsort in Mainframe but don't know how splunk would speak to
syncsort running in zOS.
Is there any architecture diagram or Manual which can help me to understand
?
On Jun 8, 2017 10:24 PM, "Pew, Curtis G"
wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Jake Anderson mailto:justmainfra...@g
It is not Splunk speaking to Syncsort the MFX sort product, it is the Syncsort
Ironstream product sending data to Splunk.
See http://www.syncsort.com/en/Products/Mainframe/Ironstream
If you download the trial copy from there you get the manual.
Chris Blaicher
Technical Architect
Mainframe Devel
It was going fairly well. Then management went full reverse on the
outsourcing. They cancelled the contract. So we are in-sourcing everything
which had been out-sourced. So OPS/mvs is staying.
On Jun 10, 2017 03:56, "Tony Thigpen" wrote:
> John,
>
> How did your OPS/MVS replacement project go? I
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 07:27:15 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
>>REFRPROT extends this to programs that are not loaded from an
>>APF authorized library.
>
>Actually, REFRPROT extends this to programs that are bound with the REFR
>option regardless of module authorization or library authorization.
>And
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:38:52 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>It was going fairly well. Then management went full reverse on the
>outsourcing. They cancelled the contract. So we are in-sourcing everything
>which had been out-sourced. ...
>
And continuing to operate with antiquated, possibly unsupported
2pts for the good guys in their white hats
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:39 AM John McKown
wrote:
> It was going fairly well. Then management went full reverse on the
> outsourcing. They cancelled the contract. So we are in-sourcing everything
> which had been out-sourced. So OPS/mvs is staying.
Wow a seal team 6 member ...
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:54 AM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 07:27:15 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
>
> >>REFRPROT extends this to programs that are not loaded from an
> >>APF authorized library.
> >
> >Ac
Jake,
If you are that interested in this function, I would recommend you contact
Syncsort Sales and request further information. That way you can be connected
directly with the vendor and how their product Ironstream feeds Splunk. (Yes,
I saw Chris has responded)
Note: it is not Syncsort the
I have no dog in this fight -- never worked for government, never dealt
with Compuware, don't remember problems with CA. Issues with other
vendors, sure, as have been abundantly described here. Closest I came to
gov work was 14 years at Mitre Corporation -- not-for-profit government
research th
g...@gabegold.com (Gabe Goldberg) writes:
> But I've profiled a couple gov agencies technology and I read
> http://www.govtech.com/ -- which highlights mostly good news (many
> interesting/innovative projects highlighted), though they also sure
> cover disasters and project failures. And half the t
I should probably relay my old story about estimated line counts: Back
around 1984 a spool shortage occurred that slowed or stopped all
processing enough that the manager response was "Put in some limits".
So someone implemented a JES2 exit that 722'd when the estimated line
count was exceeded
> On Jun 10, 2017, at 11:46 AM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
>
> private equity owned companies are under intense pressure to cut corners
> and do what ever is necessary to generate profits for their owners. In
> the case of outsourced security clearances, they were found to be
> filling out the pa
> On Jun 10, 2017, at 2:33 PM, Tom Brennan wrote:
>
> I should probably relay my old story about estimated line counts: Back
> around 1984 a spool shortage occurred that slowed or stopped all processing
> enough that the manager response was "Put in some limits". So someone
> implemented a JE
I am not unix or xml savvy. So any guidance will be appreciated.
I was supplied with an xml file to use to install a product. When it runs it
fails with the following error message. This is done on the mainframe in the
OMVS function.
SEVERE: java.text.ParseException: javax.xml.stream.XMLStre
Thank you all.
Jesse answered the question.
It looks like STCs are agnostic to ESTBYTE.
Regardless of the line count, if a STC takes 25% of the spool, it needs to
be cancelled, either by Exit 20, Netview, or as a last resort the operator.
Oh well, back to the drawing board, Exit 20, and Netview
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
> I am not unix or xml savvy. So any guidance will be appreciated.
>
> I was supplied with an xml file to use to install a product. When it runs
> it fails with the following error message. This is done on the mainframe
> in the OMVS func
John,
Thanks I will try both variations and see if either works.
The vendor is trying to create a non-mainframe universal one-size fits all
installation process, that you would then load up to the mainframe.
So they want to be able to have their customers install on Windows, Linux, AIX,
mainfr
John,
Thanks. I removed the encoding section and it worked. I have been banging my
head for 3 weeks on this issue.
Much appreciate the help.
Lizette
-Original Message-
>From: Lizette Koehler
>Sent: Jun 10, 2017 3:35 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: Help with invalid X
On 6/6/2017 8:54 PM, David Crayford wrote:
On 7/06/2017 1:43 AM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
We test (E)JES Web with current releases of Chrome, Firefox, Opera,
Safari, and IE. We also test with IE8 because it's a different animal
and requires special code to make things work right...
Do you have a f
A refreshable program may modify itself, right? REFR does not say "I don't
modify myself" it says "you can reload me if you want." Almost the same thing,
but not quite.
Granted, modifying program storage is a bad idea -- in any event.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Disc
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:48:06 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>>
>Hum, 0x4c in UTF-8 is an "L". In EBCDIC CP-037 (et al.) it is a "<". If
>you look at the first line:
>
>
>
>the phrase: encoding="UTF-8" says that the rest of the data is in UTF-8.
>But it's actually in EBCDIC. So the XML parser "sees" th
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:41:16 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>A refreshable program may modify itself, right? REFR does not say "I don't
>modify myself" it says "you can reload me if you want." Almost the same thing,
>but not quite.
>
Point taken. But it's not clear why the designers chose to allo
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:41:16 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>A refreshable program may modify itself, right? REFR does not say "I don't
>modify myself" it says "you can reload me if you want." Almost >the same
>thing, but not quite.
The key, I think, is that the system may reload the program at _
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:16:36 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 18:02:25 +, Frank Swarbrick
> wrote:
>
>>What was the first release that allowed BPXBATCH to (finally) write to
>>SYSOUT? I wasn't
>> aware of it, but indeed it does now work (z/OS 2.2)!
>
>z/OS 1.8 or z/OS 1.5, 1.6 a
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:15:11 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:41:16 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>>A refreshable program may modify itself, right? REFR does not say "I don't
>>modify myself" it says "you can reload me if you want." Almost >the same
>>thing, but not quite.
>
>T
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:20:56 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:16:36 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 18:02:25 +, Frank Swarbrick
>> wrote:
>>
>>>What was the first release that allowed BPXBATCH to (finally) write to
>>>SYSOUT? I wasn't
>>> aware of it, bu
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:43:18 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>No, what I meant was you can direct those DDs to a standard MVS file as
>opposed to only a unix file ...
>
Agreed, but be careful with "as opposed to". An early section in
"Using Data Sets" makes it clear that UNIX files can be data sets.
Not AFAIK. In theory, a RENT program may modify one of its sections
provided that this section is preceded by an ENQ, then modified, then
restored to its original value and then DEQ'd - to ensure that only one
user can execute the modifying section of code at any one time. It is a
REFR program that
Your mystification is apparently due to poor memory. I suggest
that you review the archives for the subject:: REFRPROT History Question,
a thread which you started on March 1, 2013.
In particular, see my answers in
https://listserv.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1303&L=IBM-MAIN&P=R2798&I=-3&X=-&Y
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 20:47:50 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:43:18 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>>
>>No, what I meant was you can direct those DDs to a standard MVS file as
>>opposed to only a unix file ...
>>
>I'm not sure what meaning "standard" conveys. Would it be
>better
34 matches
Mail list logo
