Charles Mills wrote:
>There must be some members here under thirty.
Hi, 24.
>Do YOU like Knowledge Center?
After I found out that the top left button opens the drop down menu of old,
I stopped thinking it was completely worthless. It still makes very poor use
of screen estate, 4:3 is ancient. If
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:57:04 +0100, Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform)
wrote:
>I'm curious about other people's views.
>
My view is: "KC s...s". Sorry to be so blunt. I have ranted about this before,
but I am feeling more and more frustrated every time I have to use it.
>I'm struggling to find anyt
We create as much 3390-54's as possible.
We have some smaller volumes only because they were converted as is from ESS's.
And we have some 3390-3 and 3390-1 for JES checkpoint and catalogs, but with
the current GDPS requirement to eliminate all Reserves, I think it would not be
a problem to comb
Thanks guys,
Sorry for the lack of response on my part.
We moved offices and datacentres at the weekend, and our DS600o that holds all
our z/OS & z/VM systems didn't power-up...
I've been busier than a one legged man in an Ar** kicking contest...
Can you say "thank god for tape backups"?
Once
The answer to your question is
in your xx TB dasd park when you have a handful of 3390-54's filled for 1%?
- probably none.
With virtual storage arrays for Disk, only what is used, is allocated to the
Volser. Say you have a MOD54 defined. But only 1% used. Then there is only
1% stor
Here's an example of capturing TEST output into CLIST variables.
TSOEXEC TEST 'SYS1.LINKLIB(IEFBR14)'
SET SYSOUTTRAP = 10
LIST 10.%+38 /* CVTDATE */
SET SYSOUTTRAP = 0
SET LINE = &STR(&&SYSOUTLINE1)
SET DOY = &SUBSTR(16:18,&LINE) /* 14:16 ON MVS 3.8 */
SET YYY = &SUBSTR(13:15,&LINE) /* 11
Cross Posting to IBM Main, IMS, DB2, and CICS.
Since there seems to be some discourse on this topic, I thought I would provide
some information on KC from a Share Session. Below is a snippet from that
presentation. Yes, this is before the CHANGE that occurred recently. So some
of the details
On 3 July 2016 at 18:35, Charles Mills wrote:
> I can understand the move away from BookManager (as much as some of us loved
> it). It was a proprietary
> technology and I am sure expensive to maintain.
I bet if IBM open-sourced Book Manager, or at least the ,BOO data
formats, it would get a lot
What version of z/OS MVS was this code run
I think Rupert Reynolds mentioned in a earlier
Post on this thread that capturing TEST output is different then when he tried
it in the early 90's
> On Jul 4, 2016, at 12:28 PM, Bill Godfrey wrote:
>
> Here's an example of capturing TEST output i
See "ABCs of IBM z/OS System Programming Volume 1", page 307 (323)
http://ibm.co/29l4I7T
Regards,
Boris
On Mon, July 4, 2016 07:33, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>
> The z/OS Basics redbook that Mike pointed to is indeed a known good
> starting point. But it does not have a list of these adrdress space
The clist in my first post was run on z/OS 2.2.
The 4-character string "amp:" if present, is an artifact of the listserv web
interface and should not be in the clist.
The clist has also run on MVS 3.8, without the TSOEXEC in front of TEST and
with different SUBSTR columns as shown in comments in
Bit savers would be interested in scans of old manuals. Can you give
them a list of what manuals you have?
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 8:03 PM, J R wrote:
> "
> We programmers just tend to be highly nervous packrats, and we should
> probably get over it. "
>
> Guilty as charged! I still have tree-s
Yes, I will as soon as I get around to taking inventory. So far I've only
tossed out duplicates.
My intention was to scan everything, but that's very labor-intensive without
specialized equipment.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 4, 2016, at 16:16, Mike Schwab wrote:
>
> Bit savers would be
Since they're loose leaf(mostly) any 'office products' store can convert
them in a matter of minutes. Don't have to do all at once, maybe just when
you need paper or toner?
http://www.pbs.org/a-capitol-fourth/home/
In a message dated 7/4/2016 4:31:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
jayare..
On 6/15/2016 1:38 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Yeah, I know, JOBn or Tnnn.
Is there a formal description somewhere? Where?
The reason the jobid is not documented is that it can be anything.
Literally any values can be specified on the JOBNAME=, JOBID=, and
USERID= keywords of the IAZXJSA
Edward, do you have an account number I can bill it to?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 4, 2016, at 17:42, Edward Finnell
> <000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Since they're loose leaf(mostly) any 'office products' store can convert
> them in a matter of minutes. Don't h
634-5789? Actually, put them in business expense column and declare on
itemized deductions.
In a message dated 7/4/2016 5:09:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
jayare...@hotmail.com writes:
do you have an account number I can bill it to?
--
Interesting. Thanks.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Jaffe
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2016 3:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Where is format of Job ID documented?
On 6/15/2016 1:38 PM, Charles M
That just gives me a tax break. I still have to pay for the service.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 4, 2016, at 18:42, Edward Finnell
> <000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> 634-5789? Actually, put them in business expense column and declare on
> itemized deductions.
>
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 23:18:15 +, J R wrote:
>That just gives me a tax break. I still have to pay for the service.
>
>> On Jul 4, 2016, at 18:42, Edward Finnell wrote:
>>
>> 634-5789? Actually, put them in business expense column and declare on
>> itemized deductions.
>>
I thought Bitsav
20 matches
Mail list logo
