Re: Address location

CSMLOC only takes one of those as the first parameters I would have to know whether it is SQA LSQA PVT. Or CSA before Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 14, 2015, at 2:05 AM, Binyamin Dissen > wrote: > > VSMLOC > > On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 01:32:26 -0400 michelbutz wrote: > > :>Given address how I

Re: Address location

michelbutz wrote: >CSMLOC only takes one of those as the first parameters >I would have to know whether it is SQA LSQA PVT. Or CSA before Binyamin Dissen [he really does know his stuff!] gave you a good solution about VSMLOC, despite the fact that you gave very little information. I and perha

Re: Address location

It's in a other address space to I'm using a SRB I am at 2.1 I guess I have to set up a FRR and check for a C78 ABEND Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 14, 2015, at 5:51 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht > wrote: > > michelbutz wrote: > >> CSMLOC only takes one of those as the first parameters >> I would ha

Re: Address location

At 04:51 -0500 on 06/14/2015, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote about Re: Address location: michelbutz wrote: CSMLOC only takes one of those as the first parameters >I would have to know whether it is SQA LSQA PVT. Or CSA before Binyamin Dissen [he really does know his stuff!] gave you a good sol

Re: Address location

On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 01:32:26 -0400, michelbutz wrote: >Given address how I can I tell whether this is SQA LSQA PVT, or CSA GDA. Shane ... -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...

Re: Address location

Were you I get that info is that in the LDA ? Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 14, 2015, at 9:08 AM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote: > > At 04:51 -0500 on 06/14/2015, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote about Re: Address > location: > >> michelbutz wrote: >> >>> CSMLOC only takes one of those as the first para

Re: Address location

Thanks Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 14, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Shane Ginnane wrote: > >> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 01:32:26 -0400, michelbutz wrote: >> >> Given address how I can I tell whether this is SQA LSQA PVT, or CSA > > GDA. > > Shane ... > >

Re: Address location/GDA is for common

GDA is for common storage I think I need the LDA for private Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 14, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Shane Ginnane wrote: > >> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 01:32:26 -0400, michelbutz wrote: >> >> Given address how I can I tell whether this is SQA LSQA PVT, or CSA > > GDA. > > Shane ... >

Re: OT STCK question

I should let this go, but Sunday is still Friday in the mind. Number agreement is based on subject - predicate. That is, subject (noun, pronoun) should be consistent with its associated verb. Whether a pronoun and its associated noun in a different clause may vary by dialect or usage. A perso

Re: OT STCK question

My sense of cacophony is all about grammar, not phonology. But the claim that 'they' has long functioned as a singular reference sent me to my Random House Dictionary. I was surprised to read this in the entry for THEY: "-Usage. Long before the use of generic HE was condemned as sexist, the pro

IEAMSCHD no FRR param

The IEAMSCHD has a FRRADDR parm But doesn't have an input param for paramters to FRR routine Sent from my iPhone -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the

Re: IEAMSCHD no FRR param

So I guess my question, what is the issue? It has the FRRADDR to pass an address of the FRR to get control. What parms do you need to pass to the FRR? Specifies the name (RS-type), or address in register (2)-(12), of an optional 4 byte input that contains the address of the Functional Recovery R

Re: IEAMSCHD no FRR param

No that big of a deal I'll just prime R13 from the SDWA with the value that the SRB had for 13 Which had my working storage Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 14, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote: > > So I guess my question, what is the issue? > > It has the FRRADDR to pass an address of th

Re: STCK question

Leap seconds are irrelevant. Let's say the routine being measured took 86,710 seconds. You would be completely correct in saying it took 1 day, 5 minutes and 10 seconds even if the run happened to span a midnight at which a leap second was added. The TOD clock is ignorant of leap seconds. They are

Re: Wait in SRB mode

> it save the complete state ... so that other work can be dispatched How is that different from WAIT? (Serious question -- not a criticism. Inquiring minds want to know.) Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Binyam

Re: Wait in SRB mode

On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 12:15:24 -0700 Charles Mills wrote: :>> it save the complete state ... so that other work can be dispatched :>How is that different from WAIT? (Serious question -- not a criticism. :>Inquiring minds want to know.) All data is off of the TCB. So nothing needs to be saved. A n

Re: Wait in SRB mode

In <4361085466878277.wa.dlikensinfosecinc@listserv.ua.edu>, on 06/12/2015 at 09:57 PM, Donald Likens said: >Does any one know of a way to wait in SRB mode. You can wait on a spin lock, but that's not desirable. Latches? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO positi

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

In , on 06/13/2015 at 10:22 AM, Steve Coalbran said: >1. What's a CV (apart from what I need for my next job!)? SNA Control Vector. >2. Whatever address I need, how do I get it? GTTERM -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

In , on 06/13/2015 at 09:51 PM, John McKown said: >ooRexx was an option, For a simple report, yes, but I keep running into situations when I want regexen, modules from CPAN or both. Is there an OOREXX intergace to PCRE or equivaelent? Can it handle named cptures? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.

Re: OT STCK question

In , on 06/14/2015 at 05:54 PM, J O Skip Robinson said: >How's that for pedigree? The Hebrew Bible goes back farther. O r were you only looking at English? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see We don't car

Re: OT STCK question

> The Hebrew Bible goes back farther. You probably meant "further".;-) === > Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 17:17:03 -0400 > From: shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net > Subject: Re: OT STCK question > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > In > , > on 06/14/2015 >at 05:54 PM, J O Skip Robinson said:

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> wrote: > In > , > on 06/13/2015 >at 09:51 PM, John McKown said: > > >ooRexx was an option, > > For a simple report, yes, but I keep running into situations when I > want regexen, modules from CPAN or both

Is there any tools or interface which could analyse or monitor SYS1.MANX directly?

Hi all We always analyse SMF data after we dump SYS1.MANX. Is there any tools or interface which could analyse or monitor SYS1.MANX directly without dump SYS1.MANX? Thanks a lot! Best Regards, Jason Cai -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: Is there any tools or interface which could analyse or monitor SYS1.MANX directly?

Yes, there are some softwares that analyze SMFs Dino Explorer can collect and analyze SMF records in real time. Optionally, it can collect and after discard the SMF record, so it is not be written at MAN files More information www.4bears.com.br Regards, Roberto Pacheco On Jun 14, 2015 11:16 PM,

Re: Is there any tools or interface which could analyse or monitor SYS1.MANX directly?

What problem are you trying to solve? There are various tools depending on what you are trying to do. Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of ibmmain > Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 7:16 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.

Re: Is there any tools or interface which could analyse or monitor SYS1.MANX directly?

https://correlog.com/solutions-and-services/sas-correlog-mf-visualizer.html Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ibmmain Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 7:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Is there any tools

Re: Is there any tools or interface which could analyse or monitor SYS1.MANX directly?

Dear As you know,IBM zSecure ALTER tool could analyze SMF records in real time. We wonder if there is any interface which could help us to develop programs to analyze SMF records in real time. Thanks a lot! Regards, Jason Cai From: Roberto Pacheco Date: 2015-06-15 10:44 To: IBM-MAIN

Re: Is there any tools or interface which could analyse or monitor SYS1.MANX directly?

You can roll your own. You can trap SMF records before they are written by hooking system exits IEFU83, U84 & U85. All documented and not incredibly difficult. (I would frankly call it simpler than average for this sort of thing.) You don't want to do a whole lot of processing in the exit itself