Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-16 Thread Charles Mills
+1 Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Dana Mitchell Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 7:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3 I'm curious how this turned out... Dana On Sun, 7 Apr

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-16 Thread Dana Mitchell
I'm curious how this turned out... Dana On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 11:51:44 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote: >Under IPCS: > >IPLDATA >STATUS WORKSHEET >CBF PSA0 > > >> From: "Brian Westerman" >> >> Tell me what you want dumped and I'll get it to you.

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-09 Thread Mark Post
On 4/7/19 9:53 AM, Charles Mills wrote: > Does VM simulate those instructions that are found in the virtual guest > environment but not on the real hardware? No. -snip- > Might VM also "up-simulate" in some circumstances? No. Mark Post -

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-07 Thread Jim Mulder
7/2019 11:44 AM > Subject: Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3 > Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" > > Well, > > Tell me what you want dumped and I'll get it to you. All of the > sites are merely waiting for their new hardware to be delivered and > since all o

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-07 Thread Charles Mills
s? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jim Mulder Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2019 8:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3 Inconceivable!(And that word does mean what I think it means.)

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-07 Thread Joe Monk
The minimum ARCH for z/os 2.3 is ARCH=10 (zEC12/zBC12, z13/z13s, z14) z114 is not in ARCH=10, so thats why everyone is confused... Joe On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 1:55 AM Brian Westerman < brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com> wrote: > Well, > > Tell me what you want dumped and I'll get it to you. All of

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-06 Thread Brian Westerman
Well, Tell me what you want dumped and I'll get it to you. All of the sites are merely waiting for their new hardware to be delivered and since all of them were already running z/VM I installed from their z/OS 1.13 client machine (one was z/OS 1.10) and they all came up fine on the first try.

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-06 Thread Jim Mulder
ot;Brian Westerman" > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 04/06/2019 11:30 PM > Subject: Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3 > Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" > > I wonder how I will explain that to the 4 sites that we have running > 2.3 under z/VM. Maybe your

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-06 Thread Joe Monk
rious what the secret sauce is to make that work. > > > > --- > > Jim Stefanik > Dallas Vintage Computing Center > > From: Brian Westerman > Sent: Saturday, 6 April 2019 01:49 > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: z114 and

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-06 Thread Jim Stefanik
ntage Computing Center From: Brian Westerman Sent: Saturday, 6 April 2019 01:49 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3 I wonder how I will explain that to the 4 sites that we have running 2.3 under z/VM.  Maybe your version of z/VM doesn't suppo

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-05 Thread Brian Westerman
I wonder how I will explain that to the 4 sites that we have running 2.3 under z/VM. Maybe your version of z/VM doesn't support it, but 4 separate sites is fairly conclusive:) actually only 3 of them are z114's the other one is a bc10. Brian ---

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-05 Thread Jim Stefanik
: Thursday, 4 April 2019 20:21 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3 That only applies for 2.3 directly on the LPAR, you can run it under z/VM with no issues. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-04 Thread Brian Westerman
That only applies for 2.3 directly on the LPAR, you can run it under z/VM with no issues. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-04 Thread Christian Svensson
ik > Dallas Vintage Computing Center > > From: Christian Svensson <022ad63487ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, 3 April 2019 22:31 > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: z114 and z/OS 2.3 > > Hi, > > I k

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-03 Thread Jim Stefanik
arc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, 3 April 2019 22:31 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: z114 and z/OS 2.3 Hi, I know that z114 is not officially supported on z/OS 2.3 - but I was wondering if anyone has had any success IPLing it just for experimental purposes on this platform? I s

z114 and z/OS 2.3

2019-04-03 Thread Christian Svensson
Hi, I know that z114 is not officially supported on z/OS 2.3 - but I was wondering if anyone has had any success IPLing it just for experimental purposes on this platform? I see that the wait state documentation for z/OS 2.3 wait state 07B says that "Miscellaneous-instruction-extension facility"