Re: z/OS 2.2 Question

2017-03-01 Thread SrinivasG
Hi Craig, Thanks for the input. Regards, Srinivas G -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Craig Bakken Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:58 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.2 Question We saw a 2X

Re: z/OS 2.2 Question

2017-02-28 Thread Craig Bakken
We saw a 2X increase in JES2 CPU usage before the PTF was applied. Afterwards the JES2 CPU usage was consistent with what we saw at z/OS 2.1. On Mon, 2/27/17, SrinivasG wrote: Subject: Re: z/OS 2.2 Question To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date

Re: z/OS 2.2 Question

2017-02-27 Thread Steve Beaver
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.2 Question Greetings, Steve. I am going from 1.3 to 2.2 also, and would like to ask you to expand on your reply. I understand the question... but not the answer. What changed in Hyperbatch? >From:Steve Beaver >Subject: Re: z/OS 2.2 Question >Were you aware that H

Re: z/OS 2.2 Question

2017-02-27 Thread John Mattson
Greetings, Steve. I am going from 1.3 to 2.2 also, and would like to ask you to expand on your reply. I understand the question... but not the answer. What changed in Hyperbatch? >From:Steve Beaver >Subject: Re: z/OS 2.2 Question >Were you aware that Hype-Batc

Re: z/OS 2.2 Question

2017-02-27 Thread SrinivasG
List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 9:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.2 Question Steve, We have relatively small machines, most effects (and benefit) from hyperdispatch is achieved with large,

Re: z/OS 2.2 Question

2017-02-27 Thread Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Steve Beaver > Sent: 27 February, 2017 15:52 > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: z/OS 2.2 Question > > Kees, > > Where are you seeing degradation?. In your system overall, or in one > system > such as CICS, DB2, etc &

Re: z/OS 2.2 Question

2017-02-27 Thread Steve Beaver
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.2 Question Hyperbatch was already default in 1.13. Kees. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Steve Beaver > Sent: 25 February, 2017 18:04 > To: IBM-MAIN@

Re: z/OS 2.2 Question

2017-02-27 Thread Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
Hyperbatch was already default in 1.13. Kees. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Steve Beaver > Sent: 25 February, 2017 18:04 > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: z/OS 2.2 Question >

Re: z/OS 2.2 Question

2017-02-25 Thread Steve Beaver
Were you aware that Hype-Batch woke up? Steve -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of SrinivasG Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 2:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: z/OS 2.2 Question Hi , After moving from z/OS

z/OS 2.2 Question

2017-02-24 Thread SrinivasG
Hi , After moving from z/OS 1.13 to z/OS 2.2 , has anyone experienced any kind of degradation in Performance? What are the performance impacts of migrating to z/OS 2.2. Is it positive or negative? Thanks in Advance, Regards, Srinivas G