z
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Gibney, Dave [03b5261cfd78-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2023 1:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: vi
Gilmartin
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 2:00 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: vi
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 20:37:35 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> >> The early 1970s PDP-10 (and PDP-8) were the Digital Equipment forerunners
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 20:37:35 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> The early 1970s PDP-10 (and PDP-8) were the Digital Equipment forerunners of
>> the later DECSYSTEM and VAX computers.
>
>No; the PDP-6 and PDP-10 were 36-bit machines. The PDP-5 and PDP-8 were 12 bit
>machines unrelated to the DECSYST
M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: vi
The early 1970s PDP-10 (and PDP-8) were the Digital Equipment forerunners of
the later DECSYSTEM and VAX computers. They were 6- and 7-bit machines. The
Operating System of the PDP-10 that my High School timeshared on in 1973 was
TOPS-10.
I remember TECO well.
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 19:42:41 +, Hayim Sokolsky wrote:
>The early 1970s PDP-10 (and PDP-8) were the Digital Equipment forerunners of
>the later DECSYSTEM and VAX computers. They were 6- and 7-bit machines. The
>Operating System of the PDP-10 that my High School timeshared on in 1973 was
>TOP
sarily express or reflect, the views,
positions or strategies of my employer.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 1:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: vi
EXTERNAL EMAIL
What is "PDP"? The 16, 18 and 36 bit archit
du/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 1:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: vi
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 17:08:09 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 10:41 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: vi
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 17:08:09 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>
> >In 1978, the
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 17:08:09 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>In 1978, the class in PDP assembler used ed. Didn't mention vi.
>Discovering vi was quite helpful to my progress in the class.
>
Mavens have cautioned me that I should master ed lest I am ever
confined to a termin
In 1978, the class in PDP assembler used ed. Didn't mention vi.
Discovering vi was quite helpful to my progress in the class.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
10 matches
Mail list logo