> You never add PCOUPLE. You promote from ACOUPLE to PCOUPLE via PSWITCH.
You do if you activate a CDS for the first time. There is nothing preventing
you from specifying both pcouple and acouple in the same command.
Admittedly I have never tried to switch both primary and alternate to a new
n
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Jerry Whitteridge
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 02/11/2014 09:30 AM
Subject:Re: XCFAS holding OMVS and XCF CDSes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe
nough.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Skip Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 7:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XCFAS holding OMVS and XCF CDSes
I should have amplified. For XCF, there is no such thing
595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Skip Robinson
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 02/11/2014 07:14 AM
Subject: Re: XCFAS holding OMVS and XCF CDSes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
The problem is that you're using the wrong TYPE keywords. They should be
T
From: Gary Weinhold
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 02/11/2014 07:09 AM
Subject: Re: XCFAS holding OMVS and XCF CDSes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Thanks for the responses, Skip and Lizette,
I probably wasn't clear that I did issue SETXCF
CPL,AC
Thanks for the responses, Skip and Lizette,
I probably wasn't clear that I did issue SETXCF CPL,ACOUPLE=SYS2.DKLOMVS.CDS03,TYPE=OMVS
and received "IXC388I SETXCF COUPLE,ACOUPLE REQUIRES TYPE OMVS TO BE ACTIVE ON THIS
SYSTEM" and similarly for TYPE=XCF.
I suspect it's something to do with the B
Gary,
XCF dynamically allocates in-use couple data sets, which will result in a
SYSTEMS scope ENQ for each one. If XCFAS continues to hold an ENQ on a couple
data set that is not in use by any system, you should probably consider
pursuing this as a defect. If you prefer, you can contact
e.com
From: Lizette Koehler
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 02/10/2014 03:47 PM
Subject: Re: XCFAS holding OMVS and XCF CDSes
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I think the same process you used for the CFRM and LOGR can be used for
the others. each one is a TY
bject: XCFAS holding OMVS and XCF CDSes
>
>I am trying to clean up a volume with several alternate couple datasets
>on it. For CFRM and LOGR, I just used IXCL1DSU to allocate alternates
>and SETXCF CPL,ACOUPLEd to them and that freed up the datasets so I
>could delete them. But t
I am trying to clean up a volume with several alternate couple datasets
on it. For CFRM and LOGR, I just used IXCL1DSU to allocate alternates
and SETXCF CPL,ACOUPLEd to them and that freed up the datasets so I
could delete them. But the XCF and OMVS CDSes are a problem. I can't
delete them
10 matches
Mail list logo
