m-main...@ldworen.net]
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 3:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XCFAS and TRUSTED
Andrew Rowley wrote on 8/20/2023 4:40 PM:
> On 21/08/2023 9:28 am, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
>
>> Secondly, when IBM states that a task should be given the attribute
>
Andrew Rowley wrote on 8/20/2023 4:40 PM:
On 21/08/2023 9:28 am, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
Secondly, when IBM states that a task should be given the attribute
of Trusted, then I take it to mean that IBM is saying that the task
can be trusted that this attribute cannot be the source of an
y
Subject: Re: XCFAS and TRUSTED
On 21/08/2023 9:28 am, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
Secondly, when IBM states that a task should be given the attribute of Trusted,
then I take it to mean that IBM is saying that the task can be trusted that
this attribute cannot be the source of an exposure for
/roberthansel
www.rshconsulting.com
-Original Message-
Date:Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:40:20 +1000
From:Andrew Rowley
Subject: Re: XCFAS and TRUSTED
On 21/08/2023 9:28 am, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
> Secondly, when IBM states that a task should be given the attribute of
> Trusted,
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Andrew Rowley [and...@blackhillsoftware.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2023 7:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XCFAS and TRUSTED
On 20/08/2023 8:53 pm, Mike Cairns wrote:
> I worked at one site many years ago where the local specialist had ac
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2023 4:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: XCFAS and TRUSTED
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or o
Subject: Re: XCFAS and TRUSTED
On 21/08/2023 9:28 am, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
> Secondly, when IBM states that a task should be given the attribute of
> Trusted, then I take it to mean that IBM is saying that the task can be
> trusted that this attribute cannot be the source of an
On 21/08/2023 9:28 am, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
Secondly, when IBM states that a task should be given the attribute of Trusted,
then I take it to mean that IBM is saying that the task can be trusted that
this attribute cannot be the source of an exposure for that task.
I think when IBM
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XCFAS and TRUSTED
On 20/08/2023 8:53 pm, Mike Cairns wrote:
> I worked at one site many years ago where the local specialist had actually
> tested across multiple IPL's the necessity for each and every one of these
> tasks to actually have the TR
On 20/08/2023 8:53 pm, Mike Cairns wrote:
I worked at one site many years ago where the local specialist had actually
tested across multiple IPL's the necessity for each and every one of these
tasks to actually have the TRUSTED attribute and the conclusion was that many
of these did not actual
"Setting Up A Sysplex" mentions the previously cited suggestion that XCFAS be
TRUSTED so ARM will work.
It also mentions using TRUSTED so XCF can access ICSF services (for CF
structure encryption) and BCPii services (so XCF can automatically detect and
isolate failed systems).
A search of the bo
> Is the requirement of the TRUSTED status documented anywhere?
I searched z/OS 2.5 for XCFAS trusted
and this was the first hit:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=tailoring-assigning-racf-trusted-attribute
I'd guess that you cannot fix this without re-IPL. You can do the "assignment"
oslaw Skorupka
Subject: XCFAS and TRUSTED
I'm setting up some sysplex and found some healthcheck is not OK, the
reason was XCFAS was not TRUSTED.
Questions:
1. Is the requirement of the TRUSTED status documented anywhere? That's
good to know before auditor asked.
2. Is there any way to fix i
Date:Sat, 19 Aug 2023 23:53:55 +0200
From:Radoslaw Skorupka
Subject: XCFAS and TRUSTED
I'm setting up some sysplex and found some healthcheck is not OK, the
reason was XCFAS was not TRUSTED.
Questions:
1. Is the requirement of the TRUSTED status documented anywhere? That'
Hi Radoslaw,
You can find the list that IBM recommends in the MVS Init and Tuning Guide:
https://www-40.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zOSV2R3sa231380/$file/ieae200_v2r3.pdf
I worked at one site many years ago where the local specialist had actually
tested across multiple IPL'
I'm setting up some sysplex and found some healthcheck is not OK, the
reason was XCFAS was not TRUSTED.
Questions:
1. Is the requirement of the TRUSTED status documented anywhere? That's
good to know before auditor asked.
2. Is there any way to fix it without reIPL?
3. Somehow related to 2. -
16 matches
Mail list logo
