@Peter, thanks.
It's probably best if I take my questions off-line.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 1:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Writing S
Reading the documentation for each of the SMF 89 subtypes, it would appear
that (in somewhat informal terms) subtype 1 reports CPU and zIIP time for
a
product, while subtype 2 reports the number of times that a product was
run
(registered itself as running). Is that a fair summary?
I'd say "no"
anuary 19, 2018 8:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Writing SMF 89 records
Thanks @Peter, this is starting to make some sense.
Reading the documentation for each of the SMF 89 subtypes, it would appear
that (in somewhat informal terms) subtype 1 reports CPU and zIIP time for a
inal Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 4:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Writing SMF 89 records
To be picky, neither IFAUSAGE nor IFAEDREG results in direct writing of an
SMF 89 re
To be picky, neither IFAUSAGE nor IFAEDREG results in direct writing of an
SMF 89 record.
But the data identified by those services is captured in SMF 89 records
that are written according to the SMF interval.
IFAUSAGE (product usage) data is in SMF 89 subtype 1.
IFAEDREG (product registration)
I seem to have this recollection that there were two ways to write SMF 89
records (not counting SMFEWTM): the IFAUSAGE macro and something that I
recall as more of an HLL-callable type routine. Am I correct, or am I
confused?
Am I perhaps thinking of IFAEDREG? Does it write an SMF 89? Or just che
