BM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> > Sent: 20 August, 2018 18:50
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: Searching the archives.
> >
> > Which URL are you using? There are two and one is for a
lier this year.
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: 20 August, 2018 18:50
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Searching the archives.
>
> Which URL are
ilto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: 20 August, 2018 18:50
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Searching the archives.
>
> Which URL are you using? There are two and one is for a much older
> archive.
>
> Could you show us you
First glimpse I thought the indexes were busted, but going to
listserv.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html everything looks OK. Subj and Authors by
date. The curious thing is if I go to Search Archives first get no hits on Subj
or Author search. However if I select a month to view and then tab over to
/cgi-bin/wa?A0=IBM-MAIN-ARCHIVES
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 5:56 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Searching the archives.
>
> Hell
Hello,
I try to look up a subject from a few months ago in the Archives, but all the
searchoptions return matches from sometimes 2005 and older, sometimes 2009 and
older. Nothing from this year.
How do I Search the Archives?
Kees.
For in
: Friday, January 19, 2018 12:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AW: Re: Only very old matches when searching the archives
I can sort of get the search to work, if you put in say '2016' for the SINCE:
field on Advanced Search,and searchf for 'AMASPZAP' you get cur
I can sort of get the search to work, if you put in say '2016' for the SINCE:
field on Advanced Search,and searchf for 'AMASPZAP' you get current results.
Still searching for 'CPU' doesn't turn up today's hits, but 'VSAM' does.
Also, nothing seems to work on Elardus's magic word 'storage'
behalf of
Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 1:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Only very old matches when searching the archives
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>I'm trying to search IBM-Main's archive but am getting only matches from 2007
>and elder. Even
a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 7:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: AW: Re: Only very old matches when searching the archives
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 05:16:16 -0600, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
>>>You are probably not using the searc
Tom Marchant wrote:
>>What I usually do is, that I search for string and then use 'Since:'
>I suggested that too, and it didn't seem to help
>>Just try it and also 'Since:" for once.
>I think he said that he did. He also said that he searched for "storage" and
>got no hits. I tried it too and als
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 05:16:16 -0600, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
>>>You are probably not using the search tool properly.
I'm not so sure of that.
>What I usually do is, that I search for string and then use 'Since:'
I suggested that too, and it didn't seem to help
>
>Just try it and also 'Since:
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>>This is WAD. You are probably not using the search tool properly.
>Can you tell me how to use it properly. Starting with the oldest matches from
>2005 and repeatedly clicking on "more hits" is not useful if you look for a
>term that appears very often.
What I usually do
>This is WAD. You are probably not using the search tool properly.
Can you tell me how to use it properly. Starting with the oldest matches from
2005 and repeatedly clicking on "more hits" is not useful if you look for a
term that appears very often.
But I understand from previous answers, th
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>I'm trying to search IBM-Main's archive but am getting only matches from 2007
>and elder. Even searching for words I can see in current threads do not show
>up.
This is WAD. You are probably not using the search tool properly.
>Is anyone else having the same problem this
>Did you check both archives? There is a current on and older one.
No, I tried searching IBM-MAIN because I knew the post I'm looking for is not
older than two years.
Anyway, as said in a previous post, I'll be using the "command line interface",
i.e. searching via mail sinc it has much better
> Subject: Only very old matches when searching the archives
>
> I'm trying to search IBM-Main's archive but am getting only matches from 2007
> and elder. Even searching for words I can see in current threads do not show
> up.
>
> Is anyone else having the sam
>How many hits does it say that there are for your search?
Well, that is part of the mystery. I was searching for words that must appear
in post, such as "storage", and I got "No Matches".
In the meantime, I tried a search via mail as show below. Instant reply with a
long list of hits, with
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:51:40 +0100, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>>So, since you're finding information from 2007, I'll assume you're in the
>>right archive, (a).
>
>
>Yep, I've verified this.
>
>
>>How are you searching? Via the web, e.g., from the Search box or Search link
>>on the right-hand navigat
>So, since you're finding information from 2007, I'll assume you're in the
>right archive, (a).
Yep, I've verified this.
>How are you searching? Via the web, e.g., from the Search box or Search link
>on the right-hand navigation here:
>https://listserv.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind1801&L=IBM-MAIN
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:30:02 +0100, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>I'm trying to search IBM-Main's archive but am getting only matches from 2007
>and elder. Even searching for words I can see in current threads do not show
>up.
>
>Is anyone else having the same problem this?
First, just to be clear si
I'm trying to search IBM-Main's archive but am getting only matches from 2007
and elder. Even searching for words I can see in current threads do not show up.
Is anyone else having the same problem this?
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
22 matches
Mail list logo