VS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 6:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (Extern
eracionais Mainframes
> Tel: +55 11 3684-9602 R: 49602 3-1404
> Fax: +55 11 3684-4427
>
>
>
> -Mensagem original-
> De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Em nome de
> Anthony Hirst
> Enviada em: domingo, 27 de janeiro de 2019 22:12
> Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E
Software
Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
Tel: +55 11 3684-9602 R: 49602 3-1404
Fax: +55 11 3684-4427
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Em nome de Anthony
Hirst
Enviada em: domingo, 27 de janeiro de 2019 22:12
Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Assunto: Re: SYSAFF and
y, January 29, 2019 8:09:44 AM
Subject: Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV [EXTERNAL]
Allen, Carmen,
I know how SCHENVs work, we used them for limited purposes.
My question to Paul was, how does he get the right SCHENV added to a job.
With our 'dependencies' we moved almost all handling to E
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 7:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV [EXTERNAL]
Paul,
Thanks. That is similar to we do with our 'Dependencies'.
The difference is that our jobs can have several 'depe
nal Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Allan Staller
> Sent: 29 January, 2019 14:44
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV [EXTERNAL]
>
> How do you add a SCHENV to a job? Doe
riginal Message -
From: "Kees Vernooij (ITOP NM) - KLM"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 6:59:30 AM
Subject: Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV [EXTERNAL]
Paul,
Thanks. That is similar to we do with our 'Dependencies'.
The difference is that our jobs can ha
are probably others, but they don't come readily to mind.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 1:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV [EXTERNAL]
We have a
essage-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Feller, Paul
> Sent: 29 January, 2019 13:50
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV [EXTERNAL]
>
> Kees, we do this several ways. Users can add the SCHEN
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 1:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV [EXTERNAL]
We have a home written utility that does this.
We are looking at replacing this by
.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Feller, Paul
> Sent: 29 January, 2019 5:04
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV [EXTERNAL]
>
> We use SCHENV to direct jobs to different lpars
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 4:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV [EXTERNAL]
SCHENV is 20 years old. I'm curious how many other shops have taken the plunge.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Pa
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Shorkend
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2019 10:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV
I used SCHENV several years ago to direct workload to a CEC that had a ZIIP
installed. An
PL.
>
> However, SCHENV would not (early 2000s) override SYSAFF. If SYSAFF and
> SCHENV conflicted, a job would just hang. So part of the supporting SCHENV
> code was to nullify any SYSAFF if SCHENV was also specified. If that has
> changed, we never revisited the issue.
>
> .
eduled IPL.
However, SCHENV would not (early 2000s) override SYSAFF. If SYSAFF and SCHENV
conflicted, a job would just hang. So part of the supporting SCHENV code was to
nullify any SYSAFF if SCHENV was also specified. If that has changed, we never
revisited the issue.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinso
One difference that I haven't seen be mentioned is that SYSAFF controls all
stages of JES2 processing, while the SCHED only controls execution phase,
we've run into issues where subsystems aren't active on some LPARs and a
job with a SCHED setting gets interpreted on that system you get a JCL
error
M
Subject: SYSAFF and SCHENV
Hi
It is just general question
I was going through the manual.
Does SCHENV perform the same function as SYSAFF ? Or it does more than that
?
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Similar purpose, but different mechanisms. SYSTEM, SYSAFF, and SCHENV all
control the system that a job is allowed to run on, but they filter based
on different mechanisms. SYSTEM and SYSAFF are based off of the JES2/JES3
member name. SCHENV is based off of your WLM setup; in WLM, you can
2019 7:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):SYSAFF and SCHENV
Hi
It is just general question
I was going through the manual.
Does SCHENV perform the same function as SYSAFF ? Or it does more than that ?
Peter
---
Hi
It is just general question
I was going through the manual.
Does SCHENV perform the same function as SYSAFF ? Or it does more than that
?
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email t
20 matches
Mail list logo
