have enough of this in the world these days? Can't we
be decent and civil to each other?
Is it really THAT difficult?
Doug Fuerst
-- Original Message --
From "Jon Perryman"
To IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date 10/31/2023 20:04:24 PM
Subject Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman i
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 23:15:44 +, Doug Fuerst wrote:
>I am not OK with any of it, and after Mr. Johnson, I suspect the list is
>not as well.
I'm also not ok with this but it's Crayford you should be calling out. By
ignoring his insults the first couple of times, I showed far more respect and
keep this civil and professional.
Please?
Doug Fuerst
-- Original Message --
From "Jon Perryman"
To IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date 10/31/2023 19:06:25 PM
Subject Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND
ON SVC 8
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 21:53:36 +
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 21:53:36 +, Doug Fuerst wrote:
>Did we just trade Bill Johnson for Jon Perryman? Are you two related? We
>are back to backbiting and insults.
>Can we just stop?
If I'm showing a pattern of being confused or being constantly wrong (as
claimed by Crayford), please show me
erryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND
ON SVC 8
On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:35:45 +, Peter Relson wrote:
As this related to a purported need to link with AC=1,
I was perfectly sure that that was not correct. And I remain so.
Is it truly a coincidence that this group failed in 1 week
On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:35:45 +, Peter Relson wrote:
> As this related to a purported need to link with AC=1,
> I was perfectly sure that that was not correct. And I remain so.
Is it truly a coincidence that this group failed in 1 week to solve a simple
SCHEDIRB and LOAD failing when shortly
Looking into it now
> On Sep 29, 2023, at 10:36 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
>
>
>>
>> even Peter Relson wasn't sure if this correct
>
> As this related to a purported need to link with AC=1, I was perfectly sure
> that that was not correct. And I remain so.
>
> Joe R: you've mentioned multipl
> even Peter Relson wasn't sure if this correct
As this related to a purported need to link with AC=1, I was perfectly sure
that that was not correct. And I remain so.
Joe R: you've mentioned multiple times that you abended after the load.
But did you ever share what abend code and abend reason
Jon
Kudos to you even Peter Relson wasn’t sure if this correct
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon
Perryman
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 10:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SCHEDIRB
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 20:29:52 -0400, Joseph
