Re: Risk/Reward ASVT in 31 bit storage

2023-09-22 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:10:37 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: >On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 19:50:43 +, Mark Jacobs >wrote: > >>So nothing more than that. IMHO it doesn't seem too worthwhile in most >>environments. Thanks however. >> >>Mark Jacobs >> > >I agree. I never did it except in sandbox environm

Re: Risk/Reward ASVT in 31 bit storage

2023-09-22 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 19:50:43 +, Mark Jacobs wrote: >So nothing more than that. IMHO it doesn't seem too worthwhile in most >environments. Thanks however. > >Mark Jacobs > I agree. I never did it except in sandbox environments and usually wait a couple of releases for changing things li

Re: Risk/Reward ASVT in 31 bit storage

2023-09-22 Thread Mark Jacobs
So nothing more than that. IMHO it doesn't seem too worthwhile in most environments. Thanks however. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com --- Original Message ---

Re: Risk/Reward ASVT in 31 bit storage

2023-09-22 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:30:31 +, Mark Jacobs wrote: >I know what the risks are in moving the ASVT into 31 bit storage, but I don't >see any benefits. Can someone enlighten me? > >Mark Jacobs > Isn't it obvious? Slightly more 24-bit storage for programs needing below the line private. An

Risk/Reward ASVT in 31 bit storage

2023-09-22 Thread Mark Jacobs
I know what the risks are in moving the ASVT into 31 bit storage, but I don't see any benefits. Can someone enlighten me? Mark Jacobs Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@prot