Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF

2016-06-29 Thread Van Eck, James: Absa
Mills Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 2:42 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF IARV64 REQUEST=DETACH,+ MEMOBJSTART=AV_RArea64, + V64COMMON=YES

Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF

2016-06-28 Thread Charles Mills
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 6:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF (sorry for omitting the "F" from the subject line previously) It is confir

Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF

2016-06-28 Thread Peter Relson
(sorry for omitting the "F" from the subject line previously) It is confirmed that in order to DETACH a 64-bit memory object you must specify AFFINITY=SYSTEM,V64COMMON=YES (otherwise the request fails) This is certainly not obvious, but it is what it is, and likely cannot be changed compatibl

Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF

2016-06-27 Thread Charles Mills
> The grouping and indentation syntax format historically used in macro-book > syntax diagrams obviously leaves a lot to be desired. Agreed. So much so that I confess I pay less attention to them than I might, and skip straight to the Parameters section. My bad. > Are you using shared-common?

Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF

2016-06-27 Thread Peter Relson
>V64COMMON=YES, It is quite apparent from the syntax diagram in the prolog of IARV64 that V64COMMON=YES may be specified only if you specify AFFINITY=SYSTEM. And the default is AFFINITY=LOCAL. Thus you in effect asked for AFFINITY=LOCAL,V64COMMON=YES. The grouping and indentation syntax forma

Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF

2016-06-26 Thread Charles Mills
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 5:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF IARV64 REQUEST=DETACH,+ MEMOBJSTART=AV_RArea64

Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF

2016-06-26 Thread Charles Mills
on memory object -- does that answer the question? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 5:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF

Re: Request for confirmation of an RCF

2016-06-26 Thread Peter Relson
>I just got an MNOTE on a nIARV64 macro assembly. I It would have been helpful to have seen the actual invocation and the actual MNOTE, as well as information about what kind of memory object you were actually trying to detach. None of the following invocations gets an MNOTE: iarv64 r

Request for confirmation of an RCF

2016-06-24 Thread Charles Mills
I just got an MNOTE on a nIARV64 macro assembly. I think the documentation is misleading. I wanted to confirm my thinking before submitting an RCF. The Authorized Assembler doc for IARV64 REQUEST=DETACH says ,AFFINITY=LOCAL ... 64-Bit Common memory objects are not affected by AFFINITY=LOCAL. I t