Just remember, A CBPDO, doesn’t have to be processed as such, Receive it like
normal, which will load the REL files, Then just APPLY/ACCEPT the FMID.
If you need the other files/doc they are there. We seem to have lost the
basics..
Ms Terri E Shaffer
Senior Systems Engineer,
z/OS Support:
ACIW
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:01:37 +0100, Keith Gooding wrote:
>Why would anyone use CBPDO + SMP/E to install z/OS ? (Not a rhetorical
>question).
>
>Z/OSMF Serverpac installation is good but you may not want to use a Serverpac
>to install a single product such as z/secure.
Would you take a sledgeha
I use, have been using for many years the ServerPac dialog, I like it,
it's easy to use and you get 2 very clear docs 'using the dialog' and
'installing your order', and of course the migration guide.
I've not use CBPDO, but IIRC when I joined state Gov long ago as a
SYSPROG they used this off
Why would anyone use CBPDO + SMP/E to install z/OS ? (Not a rhetorical
question).
Z/OSMF Serverpac installation is good but you may not want to use a Serverpac
to install a single product such as z/secure.
Keith
> On 31 Aug 2022, at 13:09, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>
> thanks for that info A
thanks for that info Art, My teammate is not real familiar with SHOP Z
and the options available.
she told me trying to order as CBPDO gave her an error, I'll work with
her some more to see why
again thanks
Carmen
On 8/31/2022 4:59 AM, Art Gutowski wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:01:53 -050
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:01:53 -0500, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>from what I was told by my teammate, Zsecure version 2.5 requires
>z/osmf, I could be wrong, she could be mistaken, but the issues she's
>having I think would affect Serverpac, or whatever it's called now,
>build JCL and submit JCL.
>
>my
I "think" ADCD is used for ISV's. In addition, zPDT uses the ADCD DASD images.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, August 30th, 2022 at 10:07 AM, Carmen Vitullo
wrote:
> okay, thanks for the clarification
>
> Carmen
>
> On 8/30/2022 9:01 AM,
okay, thanks for the clarification
Carmen
On 8/30/2022 9:01 AM, rpinion865 wrote:
IBM sends, usually twice a year, DASD images with every conceivable z/OS
software component. It's load and go, or should I say load and IPL. It's
IBM's idea of a z/OS system.
Sent with Proton Mail secure e
there are so many pieces, parts that are supported by different teams?
as I stated my first case open with IBM on the zosmf issue I was having
was related to JES2EDS, it took almost a year for them to figure out my
mail server SMTP did not require authentication , so a special jar file
was bui
IBM sends, usually twice a year, DASD images with every conceivable z/OS
software component. It's load and go, or should I say load and IPL. It's
IBM's idea of a z/OS system.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, August 30th, 2022 at 9:57 AM, Carm
the ADCD approach? I'm not familiar with that terminology, is that the
billable service from IBM that build your environment + product and you
just restore that environment? , I worked in state government where IBM
lead the Y2K project for us and that's how we receive the required OS
and produ
It seems to me that z/OSMF is being developed one piece at a time, slowly,
instead of starting with a well-thought out and relatively complet design
ahead of time. Portions are being developed and added, one at a time, as
the need for those portions of the product is discovered. It's like we are
al
from what I was told by my teammate, Zsecure version 2.5 requires
z/osmf, I could be wrong, she could be mistaken, but the issues she's
having I think would affect Serverpac, or whatever it's called now,
build JCL and submit JCL.
my case I opened was initially on the errors we were seeing on t
Just curious - I thought that only Serverpac required the use of z/OSMF and
CBPDOs are installed using traditional methods. Are there now products which
have to be installed using z/OSMF ? Is it now possible to install a CNPDO using
z/OSMF.
For the record my experience of z/OSMF for Serverpac i
I don't recall ever having to work or needing to use a product to
install or maintain a product that required another product as finicky
as z/osmf
at my 2.4 level downloading a product to support that level, the json
file version was not compatible WTH,
opening a case with IBM apparently
zOSMF. A reasonably good idea that has been extremely poorly and sloppily
implemented.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 1:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OSMF - again, next issue
I'm working
16 matches
Mail list logo
