Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-10-22 Thread Pommier, Rex
22, 2020 8:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question In regards to TYPRUN=COPY not working. In case anybody is interested in this, I received notice yesterday that PTF UJ04073 is now available for this APAR. I haven't installed it yet but it

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-10-22 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:02:53 +, Pommier, Rex wrote: >In regards to TYPRUN=COPY not working. > >In case anybody is interested in this, I received notice yesterday that PTF >UJ04073 is now available for this APAR. I haven't installed it yet but it's >there. > Where I see: Local fix BYPAS

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-10-22 Thread Pommier, Rex
mmier, Rex Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question IBM assigned an APAR number on Friday to this. It is APAR OA59800. Thanks, Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-22 Thread Allan Staller
Thx for that info... -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-22 Thread Pommier, Rex
IBM assigned an APAR number on Friday to this. It is APAR OA59800. Thanks, Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:10 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question Not

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-19 Thread Pommier, Rex
Not assigned yet. I'll let you know when I get it. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Allan Staller Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:08 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question Apar number? -Original Me

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-19 Thread Allan Staller
Apar number? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-19 Thread Pommier, Rex
Update on this. I opened a PMR on it and got a reply back from IBM that they are opening an APAR on this. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:32 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] z/OS 2.4

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-17 Thread David Spiegel
Koehler Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question This is an interesting discussion. So TYPRUN=COPY is just suppose to copy the JCL to SYSOUT. I am not sure what the expectation is by the OP But on my z/OS 2.3 system with SDSF (I

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-17 Thread Steve Smith
Good point. As a matter of fact, I looked at both jobs' output on both the 2.3 and 2.4 systems with SDSF. To be completely unambiguous, I think I must be wordy & redundant (not a poke at anyone... take that literally). The TYPRUN=COPY job that *ran* on 2.3 displayed with complete JCL in SDSF on b

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-17 Thread Wayne Bickerdike
alf > Of Steve Smith > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 4:00 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question > > Well... I just tried it, and it's true... when run on z/OS 2.4, only the > job card is listed; whereas on 2.3, all the JCL

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-17 Thread Pommier, Rex
kely) JES2. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Smith Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 4:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question Well... I just tried it, and it's true... when run on z/OS 2.4, onl

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-17 Thread Pommier, Rex
isplay. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question This is an interesting discussion. So TYPRUN=COPY is just suppose to cop

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-17 Thread Steve Smith
Well... I just tried it, and it's true... when run on z/OS 2.4, only the job card is listed; whereas on 2.3, all the JCL shows up. N.B.: This isn't an SDSF issue. SDSF does not run jobs, and does not spool their output. JES2 (or 3) does that. sas On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:50 PM Lizette Koehle

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-17 Thread Lizette Koehler
: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 1:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question I get the same result under z/OS 2.4. I submit the following job: //ALOEFTST JOB $,CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=Y,TYPRUN=COPY //IEFBR14 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14 SDSF has a record count of 12 on the

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-17 Thread Al Loeffler
I get the same result under z/OS 2.4. I submit the following job: //ALOEFTST JOB $,CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=Y,TYPRUN=COPY //IEFBR14 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14 SDSF has a record count of 12 on the Held Output Display panel, but only shows 11 when the job is selected. The JESJCLIN DDNAME has a

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-17 Thread Allan Staller
Default is MSGLEVEL=(1,1) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-16 Thread Brian Westerman
this is under z/OS 2.3: //BWTESTER JOB (xx,xx,xx),'BRIAN WESTERMAN',MSGCLASS=V, JOB07842 //CLASS=R,NOTIFY=&SYSUID,TIME=1440,TYPRUN=COPY 00020056 //* REFER WESTERB.PDS.DATA(COMMANDZ)

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-16 Thread Pommier, Rex
Behalf Of Michael Babcock Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:21 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question The default MSGLEVEL was 1,1 and that’s what was coded on the jobcard. On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:47 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hi Michael and Al

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-16 Thread Michael Babcock
anks again, > > Rex > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Michael Babcock > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:08 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question > > I get the same th

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-16 Thread Michael Babcock
> > Thanks again, > > Rex > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Michael Babcock > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:08 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question > > I get

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-16 Thread Pommier, Rex
.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question I get the same thing you do under z/OS 2.4. About 12 lines of output. I have SDSF. On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hello list, > > I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, i

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-16 Thread Michael Babcock
I get the same thing you do under z/OS 2.4. About 12 lines of output. I have SDSF. On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hello list, > > I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a > competing product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my coworke

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-16 Thread Allan Staller
Works for me with no issues. However I use sdsf. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:32 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization.

Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-16 Thread Pommier, Rex
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joe Monk Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:41 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question There is an APAR for 0C4 in JES2 when TYPRUN=COPY... https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57427 Joe On Tue, Jun 16

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-16 Thread Joe Monk
There is an APAR for 0C4 in JES2 when TYPRUN=COPY... https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57427 Joe On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hello list, > > I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a > competing product. As part of our testing of 2.4