We do not use ISFPRMxx. We're still using the assembled mac version.
Might be our issue even tho the manual states it's acceptable.
On 10/9/2018 11:29 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
From the "Summary of changes" section in the SDSF 2.3 manual :
As of z/OS V2R3, SDSF requires the SDSF and SDSFAUX addre
Good to know ahead of time, thanks Rob!
I'll be moving to 2.3 early next year
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Scott"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 10:29:22 AM
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.3, SDSFAUX missing message...
>Fr
From the "Summary of changes" section in the SDSF 2.3 manual :
As of z/OS V2R3, SDSF requires the SDSF and SDSFAUX address spaces to be active
for full functionality.
The SDSF address space manages connections, processes ISFPRMxx statements,
handles operator commands, and starts and stops SDSFAU
I don't think this issue is related to one I had, mine was security related, I
did find a match for this issue
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PI54862
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Brian France"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, Octo
