Timothy,
Thanks kind sir I will take a look.
Scott
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:22 AM Timothy Sipples wrote:
> There's a great deal of information published here:
>
> http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/zoslib/pdf/OA54807.pdf
>
> As that document indicates, please refer to the official publication
> u
There's a great deal of information published here:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/zoslib/pdf/OA54807.pdf
As that document indicates, please refer to the official publication
updates themselves for the latest authoritative information.
I see that CA has published lots of (non) impact statements
mobile; please excuse the brevity.
> Original message From: scott Ford
> Date: 8/11/18 11:13 AM (GMT-08:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Vulnerability mitigation with OSPROTECT
> Guys,
>
> Does this new APAR effect running APF mode in programs o
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re:
Vulnerability mitigation with OSPROTECT
Guys,
Does this new APAR effect running APF mode in programs or MODE=SUP mode ?
Scott
P.S. I wished I could see you guys in St. Louis
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:57 PM Ed Jaffe
wrote:
> On 8/10/2018 9:10 AM, Roland Fernan
Guys,
Does this new APAR effect running APF mode in programs or MODE=SUP mode ?
Scott
P.S. I wished I could see you guys in St. Louis
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:57 PM Ed Jaffe
wrote:
> On 8/10/2018 9:10 AM, Roland Fernandez wrote:
> > Has anyone implemented OSPROTECT=SYSTEM or OSPROTECT=1 in
On 8/10/2018 9:10 AM, Roland Fernandez wrote:
Has anyone implemented OSPROTECT=SYSTEM or OSPROTECT=1 in IEASYSxx yet? I'm
primarily concerned about the overhead and how (or even if) it can be derived
from the usual metrics.
This is the z/OS portion of the Meltdown mitigation implemented via A
It's applied everywhere at IBM Dallas but we are just now starting to test.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Roland Fernandez
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 9:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Vulnerab
