Hi Peter,
a) enabling as many subtypes in 119
b) check out near real-time monitoring for z/OS CS -
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4.halx001/inttcp.htm
c) doing whatever's required (sorry I don't know the specifics off the top of
my head) to make RACF w
Behalf
Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 6:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF Records
FYI, Co:Z SFTP supports both Unix files and z/OS data sets and cuts SMF 119
subtypes 3 and 70, the same as IBM FTP.
https://dovetail.com/docs/sftp/smf-support.html
Kirk Wolf
on Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn
CSRA
Think Next. Now.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 9:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF Records
FYI, Co:Z SFTP supports both
Yes, you need to turn on SMF 119 in IP config if you want them.
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Mike Myers
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 3:18 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.U
config if you want them.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mike Myers
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 3:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF Records
Leonard:
I don't have access to the system a
Leonard:
I don't have access to the system any more where I did this, but based
on the retained documents of the time, I gathered SMF type 119 records
from TCP/IP. Subtype 7 records contain all data relating to FTP file
transfers. They give the file name, origin IP address, time stamp (date
i
> -Original Message-
> From: Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
> Sent: 17 May, 2017 8:41
> To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
> Subject: RE: SMF Records
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailt
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: 17 May, 2017 0:18
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SMF Records
>
> Keep in mind that SMF records are cut by applica
>> What I am asking is if the SAME file is transmitted with the SAME file name
>> again, is the SAME SMF Record Type cut or is a different SMF Record Type cut?
> Normally when the same SMF events occur the same SMF record types will be cut.
>
> However, there can be some differences in exactly wh
On 17/05/2017 8:11 AM, Sasso, Leonard wrote:
What I am asking is if the SAME file is transmitted with the SAME file name
again, is the SAME SMF Record Type cut or is a different SMF Record Type cut?
Normally when the same SMF events occur the same SMF record types will
be cut.
However, there
LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Edward Finnell
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 6:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF Records
I think DAF off CBT will answer all the questions.
In a message dated 5/16/2017 5:16:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
stars...@mindspring.com writes:
Basicall
I think DAF off CBT will answer all the questions.
In a message dated 5/16/2017 5:16:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
stars...@mindspring.com writes:
Basically SMF always writes a record, it does not check if that file name
was done that way or not.
---
you missing SMF Data? Or not getting SMF Data?
Lizette
-Original Message-
>From: Jesse 1 Robinson
>Sent: May 16, 2017 3:18 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: SMF Records
>
>Keep in mind that SMF records are cut by applications or components that
>choo
By file do you mean dataset or UNIX file? For a dataset:
1. Potentially an SMF Type 15. Type 15 would have to be enabled in SMFPRMxx.
Potentially an SMF Type 80 (assuming RACF) if the dataset is audited.
2. Yes. Details would be different but it would still be an SMF Type 15.
Potentially an SMF T
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Sasso, Leonard
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: SMF Records
What I am asking is if the SAME file is transmitted with the SAME file name
again, is the SAME SMF Record Type c
Leonard"
>Sent: May 16, 2017 3:11 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: SMF Records
>
>What I am asking is if the SAME file is transmitted with the SAME file name
>again, is the SAME SMF Record Type cut or is a different SMF Record Type cut?
>
>Thank Yo
: SMF Records
The SMF process is a sequential process and each records has a time and data
stamp. SMF records DO NOT overwrite previous smf records
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Sasso, Leonard
Sent: Tuesday, May 16
The SMF process is a sequential process and each records has a time and data
stamp. SMF records DO NOT overwrite previous smf records
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Sasso, Leonard
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:47 PM
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Donald J.
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF records for SYSOUT file
The problem was that the file was not showing up yet in the JES3 queue. A
display of the printer showed nothing q
The problem was that the file was not showing up yet
in the JES3 queue. A display of the printer showed
nothing queued, yet user said a transaction had been
queued to the printer 10 minutes ago. 5 minutes later
the file is queued to JES3 and VPS immediately
printed it after 1 millisecond. Not a
Donald J. wrote:
>> WAD. You can reduce the delay via a setting. If you're still having delay
>> problems, check your JES3 performance.
>What type of setting are you referring to?
Some possible settings, YMMV:
INTERVAL=(MMSS,HHMM) INTERVAL FOR CERTAIN VPS FUNCTIONS
MRDINTVL=MMSS MISSING RES
> WAD. You can reduce the delay via a setting. If you're still having delay
> problems, check your JES3 performance.
What type of setting are you referring to?
This problem only occurs at a few random times,
and not on all files, so I would not think it is
a direct result of one parameter settin
Barry Merrill wrote:
>There is no separate SMF record written when data is sent to the JES SPOOL.
Indeed.
>And Type 6 records are be written by JES2 or by some SYSOUT processing
>packages; some packages that manage spooled output for viewing and/or printing
>write their own SMF User SMF record
There is no separate SMF record written when data is sent to the JES SPOOL.
And Type 6 records are be written by JES2 or by some SYSOUT processing packages;
some packages that manage spooled output for viewing and/or printing write
their own SMF User SMF records.
Barry Merrill
Herbert W. "Barr
Walt Farrell wrote:
>Not quite right, Elardus, if he asked the right question. He asked about
>creating/updating/deleting *profiles*, not resources.
Ouch. Thanks, I have overlooked that word 'proflies'. Yuck, my fault, but
thanks again! :-)
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
-
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:32:32 -0600, Elardus Engelbrecht
wrote:
>Tim Brown wrote:
>
>>Which smf records will give detail on creates/updates/deletes for racf
>>discrete/generic profiles
>
>Others said SMF record type 80, but there are some caveats.
>
>By default, you will see only violations.
>
Tim Brown wrote:
>Which smf records will give detail on creates/updates/deletes for racf
>discrete/generic profiles
Others said SMF record type 80, but there are some caveats.
By default, you will see only violations.
If you want to record successfull attempts too, be sure to specify
audit(a
W dniu 2013-11-21 14:47, Tim Brown pisze:
Which smf records will give detail on creates/updates/deletes for racf
discrete/generic profiles
SMF80
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku s
SMF type 80, cleverly hidden in the RACF Macros and Interfaces manual. :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tim Brown
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 7:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: smf records for updat
04
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: smf records for updating racf profiles
SMF type 80, cleverly hidden in the RACF Macros and Interfaces manual.
:-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Tim Brown
Sent: Thursday, November 21,
rame Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 8:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: smf records for updating racf profiles
Rex,
Your 'hidden' description triggered me: a few years ago I was looking
31 matches
Mail list logo
