Re: R+ / Reliability Plus

2019-03-28 Thread Lester, Bob
I seem to remember it as UCC-9? Thanks! BobL -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 4:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: R+ / Reliability Plus [ EXTERNAL ] https

Re: R+ / Reliability Plus

2019-03-28 Thread Mike Schwab
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21291812 EREP from IBM. How to request the reports. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ieav100/lgrep.htm Specify alternate name / destination. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/co

Re: R+ / Reliability Plus

2019-03-28 Thread Allan Staller
" But there is no other product similar to what R+ was doing?" AFAIK, NO -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: R+ / Reliability Plus Thanks for the

Re: R+ / Reliability Plus

2019-03-28 Thread Steve Thompson
t has been unavailable for more than 20 years. HTH, -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:27 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: R+ / Reliability Plus IIRC, R+ was a CA product. On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:2

Re: R+ / Reliability Plus

2019-03-28 Thread Allan Staller
, March 28, 2019 10:27 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: R+ / Reliability Plus IIRC, R+ was a CA product. On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:24 AM Steve Thompson wrote: > Does anyone remember this product? [Did SYS1.LOGREC processing and > reporting for multiple entities] > > Does

Re: R+ / Reliability Plus

2019-03-28 Thread John McKown
IIRC, R+ was a CA product. On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:24 AM Steve Thompson wrote: > Does anyone remember this product? [Did SYS1.LOGREC processing > and reporting for multiple entities] > > Does anyone know if there is an equivalent product for reporting > on one's own sysplex(es)? > > I've been