Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-04 Thread Seymour J Metz
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of R.S. [r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl] Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 10:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set Gentlemen, First I want to thank you for your

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-04 Thread R.S.
Gentlemen, First I want to thank you for your explanations, I appreciate it. It seems I read wrong documentation, that mean the documentation was OK, but it described older "character sets" than used in S/360 family. I read many web sites and the most popular description of "IBM code" was simi

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-03 Thread Steve Smith
I thought that vintage green (& other) cards had the actual card-punch rows listed, and it turns out that is true: http://weblog.ceicher.com/archives/IBM360greencard.pdf sas On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:10 PM Tom Marchant < 000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-03 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 15:10:20 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote: >On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:58:03 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >>I don't understand the table at: >>https://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jones/cards/codes.html >> >>The column labels 12, 11, 10, (blank) appear redundantly on the >>second and fou

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-03 Thread Tom Marchant
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:58:03 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >I don't understand the table at: >https://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jones/cards/codes.html > >The column labels 12, 11, 10, (blank) appear redundantly on the >second and fourth quadrants. You might find the chart on page 150.3 of http

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Charles Mills
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set Up until a couple of weeks ago I had a full box of 2000 that I absconded with in the early 90's. Now I'm down to about 1900. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonm

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Mark Jacobs
Up until a couple of weeks ago I had a full box of 2000 that I absconded with in the early 90's. Now I'm down to about 1900. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com ‐‐‐ Or

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Bob Bridges
Peter, you may want to go to eBay and/or Amazon and price punch cards. You may be able to make a buck or two on those in your attic. I looked at this a while ago - thought I might want to use some old ones for notepads and bookmarks, and found they're now considered antique arcana. I'm looking n

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Mike Schwab
onal) object code record, preceding ESD, TXT, RLD or > END? I still think of it as "12-2-9.") > > Charles > > > -----Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Steve Smith > Sent: Tuesday, June 2,

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 21:38:56 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: >My favorite OT theme. Related in my mind. The diameter of the original space >shuttle booster rocket was an odd value determined as follows: > >-- The booster was built in rural Utah >-- To reach the eventual launch pad, it had to trave

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:42:18 -0500, Bill Godfrey wrote: >If "S" was assigned the 0 and 2 rows because 0 and 1 were too close together, >then >why was "/" given rows 0 and 1? Does that punch a hole in this theory? GD&R > And there'sa whole row of 7-8 (sparsely populated). I don't understand the ta

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Charles Mills
t thought to be common characters. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Bill Godfrey Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 2:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set If "S"

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Bill Godfrey
s of course contained non-alphanumeric punches. The X'02' that >begins each (traditional) object code record, preceding ESD, TXT, RLD or END? >I still think of it as "12-2-9.") > >Charles > > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailt

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
rles Mills Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 2:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: Punched cards and character set CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL "Laced" (every hold punched) cards were an amusing bulletin board item. And yes, I believe I heard at the time @Jesse's premise a

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Charles Mills
t: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 2:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set That's plausible, I think. While there are plenty of adjacent punches in the full 256-characters, I'm sure most cards were mostly alphanumeric only, and it might pay to make them as stro

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set That's plausible, I think. While there are plenty of adjacent punches in the full 256-characters, I'm sure most cards were mostly alphanumeric only, and it might pay to make them as strong as possible. I remember seeing some cards

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Steve Smith
That's plausible, I think. While there are plenty of adjacent punches in the full 256-characters, I'm sure most cards were mostly alphanumeric only, and it might pay to make them as strong as possible. I remember seeing some cards that were punched in every position; those were very delicate, and

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
[IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Jesse 1 Robinson [jesse1.robin...@sce.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 4:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set I haven't seen this mentioned. The punch card codes for letters went like this: A - I rows 1 - 9

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 12:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: Punched cards and character set CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:14:33 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: > >Some card readers supported Column Binary or Card Image

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:14:33 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: > >Some card readers supported Column Binary or Card Image mode, and in >this case a card record was 160 bytes with each column mapped to the >low-order 6 bits of two adjacent bytes. I think there were some other >variations for this mapping.

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tony Harminc [t...@harminc.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 3:14 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 10:20, R.S. wrote: > As far as I k

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Tony Harminc
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 10:20, R.S. wrote: > As far as I know, a character set on punched cards was somehow limited, > so it is not EBCDIC or similar set of 256 characters. No, not at all. In fact in a way the opposite is true - a punched card column can contain way more than 256 values. There are

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
machine, so that day was a bust for me. Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 11:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set UNIVAC initially used 90 column cards; they

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:48:23 +, Seymour J Metz wrote: >That's what the multipunch icon is for. > Doesn't seem to work. Rats! It won't let me paste from my Mac clipboard. > >From: Paul Gilmartin >Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 11:45 AM > >>In this day and

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
] on behalf of Joe Monk [joemon...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 11:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set http://secure-web.cisco.com/1Zfs9qYXD4UdhoLSjssD-uiGVO42c69TjSER2FdDiHRXicVVTMTBj8rmoXCj0hh-k4Y0y16nCDFc_NshwJS1KrNx1Mven91NqYNt13MmJq7i_

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Ron Wells
Ahhh--good old days...when I started in 65--TAB operator out of school -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joe Monk Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 10:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Joe Monk
1:45 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set > > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 08:39:47 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: > > >> thousands of punched cards with no real way to read them anymore > > > >In this day and age it should be pr

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
esday, June 2, 2020 11:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 08:39:47 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >> thousands of punched cards with no real way to read them anymore > >In this day and age it should be pretty trivial to write so

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 08:39:47 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >> thousands of punched cards with no real way to read them anymore > >In this day and age it should be pretty trivial to write software that would >encode a scanned image of a punched card. > https://www.masswerk.at/cardreader/ ... and you

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Charles Mills
On Behalf Of Mazer Ken G Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 8:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set Here's a site that may have more info for your reading pleasure, http://www.punchcardreader.com/ I have used this service to decode several hundred punch

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Charles Mills
Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set Radoslaw, In the IBM world, all possible EBCDIC characters (all 256) were possible to punch into physical cards, but punching any characters not on the keypunch machine's keyboard (like lower-case letters) required using the "multi-punch" k

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Mazer Ken G
Here's a site that may have more info for your reading pleasure, http://www.punchcardreader.com/ I have used this service to decode several hundred punched cards several years ago. The historical society that I'm a member of has thousands of punched cards with no real way to read them anymore.

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 10:38 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:19:45 +0200, R.S. wrote: > >Q1: how it was in the past? I mean, were the DD * limited to "pu

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
ason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Farley, Peter x23353 [peter.far...@broadridge.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 10:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set R

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Paul Gilmartin
gt; Date: 6/2/20 7:43 AM (GMT-08:00) To: >IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set >Radoslaw,In the IBM world, all possible EBCDIC characters (all 256) were >possible to punch into physical cards, but punching any characters not on the >keypunch mach

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
First, my experience is limited to Holerith (80 column) cards; no 90 column or 96 column cards. Before S/360 there were several different encodings, both as to what hole combinations corresponded to what characters and as to what characters corresponded to what numbers. The decimal machines use

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Charles Mills
https://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jones/cards/codes.html Charles  Original message From: "Farley, Peter x23353" Date: 6/2/20 7:43 AM (GMT-08:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Punched cards and character set Radoslaw,In the IBM world, all possi

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
Radoslaw, In the IBM world, all possible EBCDIC characters (all 256) were possible to punch into physical cards, but punching any characters not on the keypunch machine's keyboard (like lower-case letters) required using the "multi-punch" key (or on older keypunch machines, physically holding t

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:19:45 +0200, R.S. wrote: > >Q1: how it was in the past? I mean, were the DD * limited to "punched >card" character set? Or it was always full EBCDIC if the job was read >from DASD? > I believe EBCDIC cards supported the full 256-character set. It was possible to have SYSPUNC

Re: Punched cards and character set

2020-06-02 Thread Bruce Lightsey
Hollerith code - used to have a template to read the punched cards that didn't have the characters printed along the top ( above each punched column ) Bruce Lightsey Database Manager MS Department of Information Technology Services 601-432-8144 | www.its.ms.gov DISCLAIMER: This email and any f