Oops, typo... z/OS 1.8
Sorry, Ant.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Anthony Thompson
Sent: Thursday, 18 January 2018 10:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDSCLEAN issue
My understanding is that the
A.EDU] On Behalf
Of Beesley, Paul
Sent: Thursday, 18 January 2018 12:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDSCLEAN issue
No, Allan is right. LNKLST can include PDSE datasets but they seem to be
managed differently to those added after IPL. They can't be deleted even after
going t
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:20:28 -0600, Jeffrey Holst wrote:
>>
>As the manual DFSMS: Using Datasets notes:
>A PDSE member is not actually deleted while in use. Any program connected to
>the member when the delete occurs can continue to access the member until the
>data set is closed. This is called a
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 11:21:56 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:08:49 +, Beesley, Paul wrote:
>
>>I have been using the PDSCLEAN program from the CBT tape file 693 for a while
>> ...
>>...
>>The report says the PDSE has been cleared, and indeed there are 0 members,
>>h
We use PDSEs in LNKLST just fine ... both SMS and non-SMS managed. The
restriction, as pointed out by Tom Marchant, is for LPA since it is built
prior to PDSE support being available during the IPL process.
We do space allocation for our LNKLST PDSE datasets (non-IPL volume resident)
at tripl
17, 2018 1:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDSCLEAN issue
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:25:40 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>The only restriction I am aware of is that the PDSE cannot be in the IPL time
>LINKLIST.
I think you mean LPA. LNKLST can include PDSE d
Oops!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 7:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDSCLEAN issue
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:25:40 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>The o
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:25:40 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>The only restriction I am aware of is that the PDSE cannot be in the IPL time
>LINKLIST.
I think you mean LPA. LNKLST can include PDSE data sets.
--
Tom Marchant
--
Fo
E and
SIEAMIGE).
Ant.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Allan Staller
Sent: Wednesday, 17 January 2018 1:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDSCLEAN issue
The only restriction I am aware of is that the PD
Just to add to John Eells' post, you can also delete all PDS/E members
and reinitialize
the directory using ISPF option 3.1 (Library Utility) by specifying Option
D (Delete member) and * for the PDS/E member name (e.g. 'MY.TEST.PDSE(*)').
Regards,
Peter Van Dyke (HCL)
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:21
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:08:49 +, Beesley, Paul wrote:
>I have been using the PDSCLEAN program from the CBT tape file 693 for a while
>...
>...
>The report says the PDSE has been cleared, and indeed there are 0 members,
>however an ISPF 3.4 display shows that the percentage used hasn’t go
Beesley, Paul wrote:
I have been using the PDSCLEAN program from the CBT tape file 693 for a while
and think it’s great, but have a quick question.
Is there an issue using this on PDSEs in the Linklist?
On 2 occasions now I have used it to zero a linklisted PDSE (Compuware’s
SLCXLOAD if it’s im
Ah yes of course, that will be it... Thanks
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Allan Staller
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ** SPAM scored: Med **Re: PDSCLEAN issue
The
The only restriction I am aware of is that the PDSE cannot be in the IPL time
LINKLIST. It can be added after IPL.
This is due to the fact that SMS is not yet initialized at the time the IPL
LINKLIST is buir.
HTH
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@L
14 matches
Mail list logo
