: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New z/Architecture Instructions and Mnemonics
Maybe, Page 7-22 shows SLHHHR and SLHHLR so maybe?
John T. Abell
Tel:800-295-7608Option 4
President
International: 1-416-593-5578 Option 4
E-mail: john.ab...@intnlsoftwareproducts.com
Fax
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jim Thomas
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2021 11:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New z/Architecture Instructions and Mnemonics
Sir,
For the moment ... I see, using gyrations of STFH, LFH, SLLG (or SRLG) with a
RLLG (or two) at the end, works ..
Usage
, March 28, 2021 10:05
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New z/Architecture Instructions and Mnemonics
Agreed but none of the shift instructions in the POPs are that long. I also
considered the Vector shift instructions but they do not fit either. I will be
interested in the end result of
viruses or any consequence thereof.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jim Thomas
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 6:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New z/Architecture Instructions and Mnemonics
Hello John
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim
Thomas
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 5:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New z/Architecture Instructions and Mnemonics
Hello Peter,
Thank you for your response .. I was at the same conclusion but, I've pulled it
up with an o
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New z/Architecture Instructions and Mnemonics
Typo? Even presenters make mistakes. I know -- I've done it.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jim Thomas
Sent: Saturday, Marc
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New z/Architecture Instructions and Mnemonics
Maybe, Page 7-22 shows SLHHHR and SLHHLR so maybe?
John T. Abell
Tel:800-295-7608Option 4
President
International: 1-416-593-5578 Option 4
E-mail: john.ab...@intnlsoftwareproducts.com
Fax:800-295
Charles Mills
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 5:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New z/Architecture Instructions and Mnemonics
Typo? Even presenters make mistakes. I know -- I've done it.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM
Typo? Even presenters make mistakes. I know -- I've done it.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jim Thomas
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New z/Archite
SERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New z/Architecture Instructions and Mnemonics
On 3/27/2021 11:01 AM, Jim Thomas wrote:
> Hello All ...
>
> I'm trying to find details on some of the newer mnemonics ... starting with
> SLLHH (among others) but have not found any Principles of Operatio
chitecture instructions That Don't Require AMODE(64) Part 1'.
Kind Regards
Jim Thomas
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 13:29
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New z/Architecture Instru
On 3/27/2021 11:01 AM, Jim Thomas wrote:
Hello All ...
I'm trying to find details on some of the newer mnemonics ... starting with
SLLHH (among others) but have not found any Principles of Operations or HLASM
doc ..
Would anybody be kind enough to point me in the right direction ??..
There
The latest PoOP for z15 has no such mnemonic as SLLHH. From what source do you
think SLLHH is a valid instruction mnemonic?
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim
Thomas
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 2:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
13 matches
Mail list logo
