Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-13 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
O.K. just saw you have made progress and know what you need to do. One other think is to update your OSPF parameters so that any dynamically added VIPA in the future is treated as a OSPF interface. That way you don't have to update OSPF. On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:14:32 -0500, John S. Giltner, Jr

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-13 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
The message means that OMPROUTE can't find the interface VIPALINK2, so I would display your home address list to make sure that it shows up in the list as address 7.7.7.8 and named VIPALINK2. I would also need to see the OSPF definition for VIPALINK2. On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:51:18 +, roscoe5

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-13 Thread Allan Staller
Classification: Confidential Firewall isue? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of roscoe5 Sent: Monday, August 12, 2024 8:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Multiple VIPAs [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread roscoe5
Just an FYI - lesson learned if anyone cares. I had planned to dynamically add the new interface in both the PROFILE dataset and in OMPROUTE. It turns out the order is very important, and I Assumed wrong. I did the Obey on the Profile first, which caused OSPF to learn partial info. It dynamically

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread roscoe5
My main problem was, I tried to use an OBEYFILE command to refresh OMPROUTE. I believe I should be using a MODIFY. F OMPROUTE,RECONFIG I’m not yet 100% there, but past my original questions. Thanks for your help Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for iOS On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 a

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread Wolfgang Fritz
HI I use only one static Vipa / lpar but we have some dynamic VIPAS for each application (FTP, CICS, DB2 and so on..) it works fine. regards Wolfgang Am 12.08.2024 um 15:51 schrieb roscoe5: Thanks again. I understand it’s a routing issue and I added a matching OSPF_Interface where the

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread roscoe5
Thanks again. I understand it’s a routing issue and I added a matching OSPF_Interface where the original one was defined, using the new IP and Destination Address. But when I issue the OBEYFILE command I get “EZZ7871I NO MATCHING INTERFACE STATEMENTS FOR 7.7.7.8 (VIPALINK2)”. My gut instinct keep

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
O.K., that is a routing issue. You need to look at your OSPF parameters and verify that you are setup to advertise 7.7.7.8 to your neighbors. If your not, then you need to update you OSPF parameters to advertise it and go from there. No matter what you may want to check with whomever handles

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread roscoe5
John, Thanks for your time and the thorough response. I’m not too concerned about the applications, but your comments confirmed what I thought in that area. One quick test failed to work in the OSPF space (did not recognize the new IP address). However, I think I’ll have another test opportunity

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
You should only need to add a new VIPA: For all traffic that is initiated to your system, they just specify the destination IP address 7.7.7.8, or create a DNS entry that resolves to that address and have them use that host name. For most of traffic the that you initiate outbound I would look