Kirk,
the sample exec is equal to the class you are using. What you supplied is
the calling program code snip. With a small change to the exec, (PARSE
UPPER ARG KEY replaces the Say & Pull statements) you can class it as a
function. exactly like you do with Java, and it is much shorter from caller
Dale,
Respectfully I disagree - CSI is not equally complicated to setup and
process in all languages.
Here's the IBM shipped z/OS java sample that sets up a call:
https://github.com/zsystems/java-samples/blob/master/CatalogSearchSample.java
...
CatalogSearch catSearch = new CatalogSearch(filterKe
On 18/03/2020 9:49 am, Billy Ashton wrote:
Now, I have not done anything with batch Java here; do you have a more
complete example of how to use it?
Billy
I have created some more complete Java samples and uploaded them to
GitHub. There are 3 samples:
- A simple catalog list by dataset patter
For completeness' sake, REXX also comes with IBMi, but what a horrible
implementation it is. And the only two IBM manuals are from 1997!
Dana
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:33:32 -0500, Dale R. Smith
wrote:
> REXX comes with z/OS (and z/VM and I believe z/VSE, don't know about TPF),
> Lua does n
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:45:05 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>I'm not knocking your code which looks very good, but yet again it's a
>good example of why REXX is a poor language for processing binary data.
>
>I don't use REXX much these days. On z/OS I use either Lua [1] or Python
>[2], mainly Lua a
09:21
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Oh no! Run for the hills :)
Good luck with that! I wouldn't fancy processing an SMF 110 CMF record
(with a dictionary) in REXX! I've done it in Java and that was onerous.
On 2020-03-20 3:16 PM,
3?mt=2
Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA
From: David Crayford
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 20/03/2020 09:21
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Oh no! Run for the hills :)
Oh no! Run for the hills :)
Good luck with that! I wouldn't fancy processing an SMF 110 CMF record
(with a dictionary) in REXX! I've done it in Java and that was onerous.
On 2020-03-20 3:16 PM, Martin Packer wrote:
I might be about to open that can of worms permanently (SMF and
REXX) ... :-)
I might be about to open that can of worms permanently (SMF and
REXX) ... :-)
Seriously, I have a few tips and tricks on processing SMF with REXX. And
I’m aiming to open source something. It’s not quite ready and it will be
the START of something, not a finished journey. (The idea being others
cou
I'm not knocking your code which looks very good, but yet again it's a
good example of why REXX is a poor language for processing binary data.
I don't use REXX much these days. On z/OS I use either Lua [1] or Python
[2], mainly Lua as it runs in TSO/ISPF which Python doesn't. Both
languages ha
19, 2020 8:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 21:04:27 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>I think that sample is a perfect example why you shouldn't use REXX for
>processing complex records!
>
>All the magic number offsets and dat
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 21:04:27 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>I think that sample is a perfect example why you shouldn't use REXX for
>processing complex records!
>
>All the magic number offsets and data conversions will only get worse as
>the complexity of the program increases.
Which is why REXX
I think that sample is a perfect example why you shouldn't use REXX for
processing complex records!
All the magic number offsets and data conversions will only get worse as
the complexity of the program increases.
On 2020-03-18 1:04 PM, Brian Westerman wrote:
How about the rexx exec IGGCSIRX
Brian ,
Thats another good example as well as what Al said. I havent used java much
on z/OS ...so i cant comment on it.
Scott
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 1:05 AM Brian Westerman <
brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com> wrote:
> How about the rexx exec IGGCSIRX in SYS1.SAMPLIB?
>
> There is also a share han
How about the rexx exec IGGCSIRX in SYS1.SAMPLIB?
There is also a share handout from 2014 that you can probably find on the
internet.
RESUME = 'Y'
Do While RESUME = 'Y'
/* Call the Catalog Search Interface */
ADDRESS LINKPGM 'IGGCSI00 RETAREA CSIFIELD WORKAREA'
...
RESUME = SUBSTR(CSIFIELD,150,1
"
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 3/17/2020 6:18:08 PM
Subject: Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
Does it have to be Rexx?
There is a Java interface to the CSI that is certainly easier than
assembler, and I would say is easier than Rexx.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SS
Now, I have not done anything with batch Java here; do you have a more
complete example of how to use it?
Billy
-- Original Message --
From: "Andrew Rowley"
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 3/17/2020 6:18:08 PM
Subject: Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
Does it have to be Rexx?
Does it have to be Rexx?
There is a Java interface to the CSI that is certainly easier than
assembler, and I would say is easier than Rexx.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSYKE2_8.0.0/com.ibm.java.zsecurity.api.80.doc/com.ibm.jzos/com/ibm/jzos/CatalogSearch.html
On 18/03/2020 12:
IGGCSI00 can return much more than that, assuming that's the program you
mean. The examples and samples mostly need to be enhanced to take
advantage.
sas
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:56 PM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> Afaik the program only returns catalog, dsname and volser.
--
PIPEs available the PIPE LISTCAT is an excellent tool
> > >> to use if you only want the dataset name, and optionally the
> > >> dataset type.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Lionel B. Dyck <
> > >> Website: http://www.lbdsoftware.com
> >
t you are, reputation merely what others think you are." -
> >> John Wooden
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> >> Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 9:00 AM
> >&g
gt;>
> >> "Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is
> >> what you are, reputation merely what others think you are." - John
> >> Wooden
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discus
ginal Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
scott Ford
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 11:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
Lennie,
It’s Ken Tomiak .. I just found it my friend.
Scott
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:54 PM Richa
;Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is
>>> what you are, reputation merely what others think you are." - John
>>> Wooden
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
>>
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 12:49 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
>
> Scott,
> Thanks,
>
> As I live in the UK I don't get
Also check out Mark Zelden's CATSRCH rexx exec
http://mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 12:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
Scott,
T
tation. Character is
>> what you are, reputation merely what others think you are." - John
>> Wooden
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
>> Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 9:00 AM
>>
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:07:57 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>[LINKPGM] It's more like LINK than like CALL.
>
I agree.
>If you want a jobstep parameter, why not use address LINKMVS, which builds the
>HW length field automatically?
>
The ICSF interface the example uses does not use a HW length, but
lf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 10:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:17:13 +, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
>I have a need to make use of IGGCSI00.
>It wou
hat
>> could be cleaned up in REXX, but there are other things that are eleant if
>> not misused.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>
>>
>>
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
>> of
day, March 17, 2020 9:00 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
>
> All languages have glitches, especially C. Certainly there are things that
> could be cleaned up in REXX, but there are other things that are eleant if
> not
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:17:13 +, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
>I have a need to make use of IGGCSI00.
>It would make my life a lot easier if I could work in REXX rather than
>assembler. I see that IBM have supplied a sample routine called IGGCSIRX
>showing how it can be used from REXX, thoug
n merely what others think you are." - John Wooden
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
All languages have glitches, especially C. Certai
List on behalf of
Steve Smith
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 9:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGGCSI00 and REXX
REXX is inherently kludgy (who needs structures? SUBSTR can do
anything!).
That's not a big REXX exec. Just de-kludge to your taste, if possible.
IGGCSI00 is t
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 8:53 AM Steve Smith wrote:
> REXX is inherently kludgy (who needs structures? SUBSTR can do
> anything!).
>
> That's not a big REXX exec. Just de-kludge to your taste, if possible.
> IGGCSI00 is tricky to get started with, so you definitely want to start
> with a working
REXX is inherently kludgy (who needs structures? SUBSTR can do
anything!).
That's not a big REXX exec. Just de-kludge to your taste, if possible.
IGGCSI00 is tricky to get started with, so you definitely want to start
with a working example. There are also a couple of assembler samples
provided
36 matches
Mail list logo
