ernal] Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
Rex,
There are 2 places HSM records the DUPLEX volser 1 in the MCV record while the
Primary volume is still a partial tape and then in the TTOC record. The DUPLEX
tape would be displayed in the LIST TTOC output if the Primary volume
Rex,
There are 2 places HSM records the DUPLEX volser 1 in the MCV record while the
Primary volume is still a partial tape and then in the TTOC record. The DUPLEX
tape would be displayed in the LIST TTOC output if the Primary volume still
existed. If it doesn't show in the LIST TTOC output th
rsday, February 14, 2019 2:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
I get "entry not defined". Unfortunately that doesn't help, because on my
playground I have duplex tapes with their primary ML2 tape still existent, and
lf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
Try HSEND DELVOL(XX) PURGE FORCE(?)
I haven't looked up the syntax.
Actually, if they are not in the TTOC you can probably just
al] Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
Most likely a continuation of a prior volume. Without going into a lot of
detail, if a dataset spans from 1 volume to another the 1st volume in the
sequence "owns it".
Duplex volumes are never referenced by DFHSM directly.
I'll try the TAPEREPL process in a test
environment to see what happens.
Thanks.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 8:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: HSM question - ML2 c
Most likely a continuation of a prior volume. Without going into a lot of
detail, if a dataset spans from 1 volume to another the 1st volume in the
sequence "owns it".
Duplex volumes are never referenced by DFHSM directly.
HSEND LIST TTOC will list all primary voulmes. I expect the duplex volum
