On 2015-02-27 23:08, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
In
<49f2b7b0100a4f488766e671d8c27dcb971...@defthw99ex2msx.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>,
on 02/24/2015
at 10:49 AM, "Beesley, Paul" said:
Our customer has been trialling Enterprise PL/1 4.4, with the
intention of upgrading from their curren
In
<49f2b7b0100a4f488766e671d8c27dcb971...@defthw99ex2msx.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>,
on 02/24/2015
at 10:49 AM, "Beesley, Paul" said:
>Our customer has been trialling Enterprise PL/1 4.4, with the
>intention of upgrading from their current compiler, PL/1 for
>MVS&VM.
I'm curious about how i
--
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-
m...@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Robert Prins
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 12:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Enterprise PL/1 performance
On 2015-02-24 10:49, Beesley, Paul wrote:
Hello
Our customer has been trialling Enter
Here again we have the common misunderstanding
of the RENT compiler option:
Compiling with the NORENT option does not mean that
the modules are not reentrant. The modules can be linked
RENT, REUS anyway, if they are naturally reentrant (as it was
the case with earlier releases of PL/1 compilers,
On 24 Feb 2015 02:49:50 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>Hello
>
>Our customer has been trialling Enterprise PL/1 4.4, with the intention of
>upgrading from their current compiler, PL/1 for MVS&VM.
>They have issues with performance, particularly with CICS programs, where the
>CPU tim
on WSCLEAR, which did not require
initializing variables, I don't know about pre Enterprise Versions of PL/I.
Denis.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Prins
To: IBM-MAIN
Sent: Tue, Feb 24, 2015 2:54 pm
Subject: R
, I don't know about pre Enterprise Versions of PL/I.
Denis.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Prins
To: IBM-MAIN
Sent: Tue, Feb 24, 2015 2:54 pm
Subject: Re: Enterprise PL/1 performance
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
in time to
> allow the third parm to be set to something other than 00.
> For example VS COBOL used to have the option WSCLEAR, which did not
> require initializing variables, I don't know about pre Enterprise Versions
> of PL/I.
>
> Denis.
>
> -
OL used to have the option WSCLEAR, which did not require
initializing variables, I don't know about pre Enterprise Versions of PL/I.
Denis.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Prins
To: IBM-MAIN
Sent: Tue, Feb 24,
On 2015-02-24 11:57, Beesley, Paul wrote:
Info on the PL/I list:
Join pl...@listserv.dartmouth.edu on the internet. To subscribe, send a note to
lists...@listserv.dartmouth.edu In the body of the note, enter:
SUB PL1-L yourname
To post a comment, send it to pl...@listserv.dartmouth.edu
Robe
On 2015-02-24 11:52, Beesley, Paul wrote:
Robert
Many thanks for your reply. I have added my vote to the RFE.
Here are the compiler options from the latest trial, the LE override options
from the DCL PLIXOPT statement, and the results of a CLER transaction from the
relevant CICS region.
I don
It is also important that the value of ARCH() be the
appropriate one for the target machine on which the PL/I program is to be
executed (and not that of the source, compiling machine if they are
different)
The default values of ARCH are very conservative, usually inappropriate
ones.
On Tue, Feb 2
Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
>NORENT is the option that tells the EP compiler to do the same that all the
>"old" compilers did, that is, put the static variables in the STATIC CSECT.
Ok. Thanks. Now that makes sense!
>See these older discussions on ASSEMBLER-L:
I must have missed them or forgot them
NORENT is the option that tells the EP compiler to do the same
that all the "old" compilers did, that is, put the static variables in
the STATIC CSECT. If the program is reentrant or not, depends on
the programmer; if he or she changes static variables during execution,
the program will not be ree
uggesting NORENT?
I don't know to be honest. Other users' experience possibly.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.ed
XUFLOW(AUTO)
Regards and thanks
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Robert Prins
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 12:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Enterprise PL/1 performance
On 2015-02-24 10:4
Warning: My PL/1 skills are really decayed...
Beesley, Paul wrote:
>Our customer has been trialling Enterprise PL/1 4.4, with the intention of
>upgrading from their current compiler, PL/1 for MVS&VM.
At what level of z/OS, VM, Language Environment and CICS?
>They have issues with performance,
On 2015-02-24 10:49, Beesley, Paul wrote:
Hello
Our customer has been trialling Enterprise PL/1 4.4, with the intention of
upgrading from their current compiler, PL/1 for MVS&VM. They have issues with
performance, particularly with CICS programs, where the CPU time of a
transaction is 3 times wh
18 matches
Mail list logo
