On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 22:31:52 -0600, Tim Hare wrote:
>I moved a lot of tape datasets to SMS managed disk, also, but one group of
>application people fought the idea of using unique, catalog-able names for
>their datasets. Pure laziness - they didn't want to go through the work of
>making the ch
I moved a lot of tape datasets to SMS managed disk, also, but one group of
application people fought the idea of using unique, catalog-able names for
their datasets. Pure laziness - they didn't want to go through the work of
making the changes and testing. They did eventually have to do it th
ata centers; but many of the production sites I have
reviewed show that HSM-archive data is only about 25% of their overall tape
usage. Still, a large chunk - no question.
Russell
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
about 25% of their overall tape
usage. Still, a large chunk - no question.
Russell
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2018 2:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another IBM tape not
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another IBM tape not for z/OS
On 12/02/2018 07:55 PM, Rugen, Len wrote:
Batch tape should be dead, even if batch JCL still looks like tape is used.
One of my last SMS projects was to manage tape, redirecting almost all to SMS
disk.
Before employin
Roger Lowe wrote:
>The "SafeGuarded Copy" feature of the IBM DS8000 disk subsystem
>creates backups that are not accessible by the host and protects
>them from corruption that can occur in the production environment.
>Safeguarded Copy can create multiple backups on a regular basis,
>such as hourly
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:39:22 -0600, Russell Witt wrote:
>So very true. And the concept of an "air-gap" backup has become a real issue
>and shows one of the problems with replication. And nothing is better for an
>"air-gap" backup than tape, including Virtual Tape.
>
>The other point is that whil
one.
Russell Witt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another IBM tape not for z/OS
On 12/02/2018 07:55 PM, Rugen, Len wrote:
> Ba
ssage-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Joel C. Ewing
Sent: 04 December 2018 15:30
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Another IBM tape not for z/OS
WARNING: this email has originated from outside of the SSE Group. Please trea
27;t get all of them, but tape mount hate
weeded out the rest quickly.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another IBM tape not for z/OS
On 12/02/2018 07:55
On 12/02/2018 07:55 PM, Rugen, Len wrote:
> Batch tape should be dead, even if batch JCL still looks like tape is used.
> One of my last SMS projects was to manage tape, redirecting almost all to SMS
> disk.
>
>
>
Before employing any technique to convert all tape data sets to DASD,
one shou
Batch tape should be dead, even if batch JCL still looks like tape is used.
One of my last SMS projects was to manage tape, redirecting almost all to SMS
disk.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructio
N@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another IBM tape not for z/OS
Lately, all I have seen is virtual Tape emulated in dedicated VTS filled
with DASD. That's all we have now. Read/write and recalls are on par
with standard disk.
_
W dniu 2018-11-26 o 11:18, Timothy Sipples pisze:
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
IBM released new tape drive TS1160.
20TB/60TB capacity, up to 400/900MB/s data
transfer, dual 16Gbps interface.
You can attach it to your Windows server, or
Linux (x64), but mainframe
is excluded, no FICON attachment.
I
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>IBM released new tape drive TS1160.
>20TB/60TB capacity, up to 400/900MB/s data
>transfer, dual 16Gbps interface.
>You can attach it to your Windows server, or
>Linux (x64), but mainframe
>is excluded, no FICON attachment.
I think you might have missed the last 10+ years.
ently. But the benefits of a VTS solution
doomed that as well.
Russell Witt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jousma, David
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 10:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another IBM ta
Lately, all I have seen is virtual Tape emulated in dedicated VTS filled with
DASD. That's all we have now. Read/write and recalls are on par with
standard disk.
_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
davi
17 matches
Mail list logo
